Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sword fights and sex abuse: only 1% of minors send explicit nude photos

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 11:21 AM
Original message
Sword fights and sex abuse: only 1% of minors send explicit nude photos
In 2008, the National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy said that 20 percent of teens had distributed nude or semi-nude pictures of themselves. Cue the moral panic about sexting!

Certainly, examples of sexting—both ridiculous and unnerving—weren't hard to find. A new paper in Pediatrics on teen sexting arrests contains a wealth of examples. Consider three that span the spectrum. Here's the ridiculous:

At a party where there was heavy drinking, 3 boys in the shallow end of a pool pulled down their swim trunks and had a “sword fight.” A girl, 17, filmed this and sent the video via cell phone to 6 other people. The 3 boys did not know she had taken the video or sent it. The girl was charged in juvenile court.

Now the deeply unsettling:

The parents of a 16-year-old contacted police because a boy was extorting their daughter. The victim said she had accidentally uploaded a nude picture of herself to a social networking site. When she realized this, she deleted the image, but a boy from her school had already downloaded it. He threatened to distribute it if she did not send him more nude pictures. When the girl refused, the boy sent the picture to ∼100 people. The boy, who was a straight-A student, was charged with a felony. He pleaded guilty and was put on probation

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/12/sword-fights-and-sex-abuse-only-1-of-minors-send-explicit-sexts.ars
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. The survey referenced got info from teens via INTERVIEW. How many teens would admit
to that behavior? Even with the word 'confidential' used beforehand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Alternatively...
... how many might say that they had when they actually hadn't?

Loads of ways that the data could be faulty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. "Accidentally uploaded a nude picture of herself"
Reminds me of a scene from The West Wing.

SAM
About a week ago, I accidentally slept with a
prostitute.

TOBY
Really?

SAM
Yes.

TOBY
You accidentally slept with a prostitute?

SAM
Call girl.

TOBY
Accidentally?

SAM
Yes.

TOBY
I don’t understand. Did you trip over something?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. GOP members of Congress launch an investigation as to why the number is so low.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. So what? It's the ultimate non-issue. "Teenagers are horny", like it's news.
If we're going to have complete control of intellectual property we should just make everything anyone puts on the internet before age 21 disappear at majority unless they elect to keep it.

Otherwise we just need to accept that people are dumb, and dumb people have sex, and there's nothing wrong with this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC