Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Upshot On Citigroup Settlement: SEC Can No Longer Be 'Yapping, Small Dog' - HuffPo

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-11 03:46 PM
Original message
Upshot On Citigroup Settlement: SEC Can No Longer Be 'Yapping, Small Dog' - HuffPo
Upshot On Citigroup Settlement: SEC Can No Longer Be 'Yapping, Small Dog'
Loren Berlin - HuffPo
First Posted: 11/29/11 05:06 PM ET Updated: 11/29/11 06:22 PM ET

<snip>

When federal judge Jed Rakoff tossed out a proposed settlement between the Securities and Exchange Commission and banking giant Citigroup on Monday, he signaled to both the SEC and the nation's largest financial institutions that the two parties can no longer snuggle up together in cozy settlements that enable misbehaving banks to pay a fine for their bad deeds without ever requiring the institutions to admit wrongdoing.

According to some legal professionals, Judge Rakoff's decision could be a game-changer, requiring the SEC to really step up to the plate in terms of enforcement. "If the SEC expects to be suing investment banks in the future -- and I know they do -- this creates a real problem for them if they have to justify their settlements in some detail," said Adam C. Pritchard, a law professor at the University of Michigan Law School.


Judge Rakoff, a Clinton appointee who serves the southern district of New York, wrote in his decision that the SEC's "long-standing policy, hallowed by history but not by reason," of allowing financial institutions to avoid admitting guilt betrays the public interest -- both individual investors and society at large -- by leaving the question of what really happened unaddressed. As long as the bank does not have to acknowledge the facts, the truth remains unknown.

Robert Khuzami, director of enforcement at the SEC, said in a public statement that Judge Rakoff's ruling "ignores decades of established practice throughout federal agencies and decisions of the federal courts." But Pritchard asserts that it is exactly this history that Judge Rakoff is challenging. "These settlements have traditionally been an easy way out for the SEC. It's been the agency's way of putting the financial institutions on notice, of saying, 'This is how we think the industry should behave, and if you don't want to get in trouble with us, you will do it the way we think you should do it, as represented by the settlement.' Judge Rakoff is saying that he thinks it's time to figure out what the law is, what the obligations are for these banks."

<snip>

More: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/29/citigroup-settlement-sec-judge-jed-rakoff_n_1119029.html

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-11 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. As opposed to hanging everyone involved.
Which I still seem to favor. After a fair trial with complete disclosure, of course.

We need to get out the habit of thinking that white collar crime does less harm than a street mugging.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-11 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. + 1,000,000,000... What You Said !!!
:bounce:

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-11 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. Kick !!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC