Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Every time these guys debate Ron Paul looks better in comparison.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
SwampG8r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-11 12:44 AM
Original message
Every time these guys debate Ron Paul looks better in comparison.
Discuss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-11 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Only in comparison to one another. In comparison to the real
world they are all nutjobs, including Ron Paul.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indianademocrat91 Donating Member (287 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-11 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. Just because he doesn't act like a moron doesn't mean he isn't one
7 agencies he would cut first day, 1 trillion dollars right away - economy tanks as a result, no 1964 civil rights (same as his sons view)... He's a radical, I don't care how sane he sounds or acts when he talks but he would probably be the one to make the US a third world country
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
penguin7 Donating Member (962 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-11 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. We cut one trillion dollars of waste
Thereby freeing an enormous amount of resources for productive purpose and you think that is bad for the economy?

And there is easily one trillion dollars of waste and lucre for the well connected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indianademocrat91 Donating Member (287 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-11 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. I'm talking about the trillion he would cut
Medicaid, Medicare, SS, I should have been more specific sorry. He's a libertarian freak, no way he cuts where it's needed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-11 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. You're assuming all the cuts *would* be waste.
Bad assumption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-11 05:03 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. Precisely
What Ron Paul wants to cut many of us consider to be essential. He has a much, much different view of "waste" than the rest of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
38. Republican's version of waste is different than our version of waste.
Social Security, education, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZenaD Donating Member (194 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-11 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
3. He's horrifying on social and economic issues.
Being right like a broken clock about foreign policy doesn't mitigate that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-11 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. no, it's more like six cavemen debating a Martian.
now, if you want to consider a Martian to be better than cavemen...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
penguin7 Donating Member (962 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-11 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
6. There are the corporate candidates and there is Ron Paul
Last presidential election there was Kucinich and Ron Paul.

I notice that many try to marginalize any candidate that is not corporate. This makes sense in the mainstream media, but it is somewhat surprising to me that anti-corporate candidates are marginalized on the internet blogs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-11 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. "Anti-corporate candidate Ron Paul". What a joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
penguin7 Donating Member (962 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-11 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. Anti-Corporate Fascism to be more exact
Most of government right now is corporate Fascist, i.e., corporations control the government.

Ron Paul is the only guy running opposing corporate fascism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-11 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Ron Paul's stated policy positions PROMOTE and ENCOURAGE fascism.
You've got it exactly backwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
penguin7 Donating Member (962 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-11 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. For Example?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-11 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Getting rid of all regulations on businesses (INCLUDING CORPORATIONS) for example.
Duh. Are you that thick?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
penguin7 Donating Member (962 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-11 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Corporations writing the rules is Fascism
Edited on Fri Nov-25-11 03:30 PM by penguin7
and incidentally that is what we have now.

Removing rules is not necessarily Fascism, perhaps it could be anarchy.

Arguably our rules are not doing us much good. We are not even measuring the radiation in our food after Fukushima.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-11 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. .
:banghead:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshstart Donating Member (112 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #20
26. Ron Paul was a plaintiff on the side of
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #6
27. No one is more pro corporation..
.. than idiot Libertarians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawson Leery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-11 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
8. He opposed America's imperialist foreign policy
the drug war and the current Federal Reserve system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshstart Donating Member (112 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #8
31. Would you feel differently about that
if you realized that one of his foreign policy advisors, Doug Bandow is connected to Jack Abramoff?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshstart Donating Member (112 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. Here is a little bankground on Doug Bandow
Edited on Sat Nov-26-11 10:17 AM by freshstart
Ron Paul's policy advisor:
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?108392-Ron-Paul-Campaign-Announces-Addition-of-New-Policy-Advisors

Bandow wrote op-eds favorable to Jack Abramoff's causes for cash:
http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/dec2005/nf20051216_1037_db016.htm

"A former Abramoff associate says Bandow and at least one other think-tank expert were typically paid $2,000 per column to address specific topics of interest to Abramoff's clients. Bandow's standing as a columnist and think-tank analyst provided a seemingly independent validation of the arguments the Abramoff team were using to try to sway Congressional action.

Bandow confirms that he received $2,000 for some pieces, but says it was "usually less than that amount." He says he wrote all the pieces himself, though with topics and information provided by Abramoff."

Bandow wrote that Social Security was a ponzi scheme in 2002 on Ron Paul's Freeman website - I guess that is where Rick Perry got it from:
http://www.thefreemanonline.org/columns/uncle-sams-retirement-scam/


Do you see how utterly stupid his cult of followers are? They are cheering the addition of Bandow and hyping up his qualifications including that he has been published in many newspapers...yep he wrote for cash from Jack Abramoff in order to influence congress...and that is nothing to cheer about. Do you think they ever looked into his background? It was really easy to find his connection to Abramoff.

I don't listen to a word Ron Paul says, he obviously has bad judgement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ohio Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-11 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
11. Ron Paul is a racist douchebag... Among other things
Fuck him. He deserves not a single good word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshstart Donating Member (112 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
36. He's a Koch whore
Edited on Sat Nov-26-11 03:55 PM by freshstart
always has been. Look at #11 from 1984. David Koch from Kansas was a huge contributor to Ron Paul from Texas then.
http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=vOxYAAAAIBAJ&sjid=HFcMAAAAIBAJ&pg=2817,3848869&dq=koch+ron+paul&hl=en

See this, they are all Koch funded groups on Ron Paul's website, so it is obvious the relationship continues:
http://www.free-nefl.com/html/nefl.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-11 03:28 AM
Response to Original message
12. He's the same jerk he always was. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-11 04:41 AM
Response to Original message
13. Ron Paul is right about the wars and the military.
Unfortunately he is wrong about everything else -the racism and social security and medicare. He claims medicare and social security are unconstitutional. He is way wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-11 05:06 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Agreed
The constitutional argument about SS & Medicare even if absolutely correct on his part (and I don't believe so) leads to just how do you undo it? There are people who depend on the system and those who paid in good faith into it and are due a return on those payments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #13
37. Yes. He will not win the nomination, but he has been good for the debate.
It is about time SOMEONE used the word "warmongering" when the corporate dwarfs meet to debate.

And where the hell is OUR anti-war candidate?

Support OWS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. I agree. At least someone is saying it.
Yeah, where the hell is our anti-war candidate? I'm with OWS all the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-11 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
16. Ron Paul is just as big of nut job as the rest. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-11 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
17. No...nt
Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aerows Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-11 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
21. They are all crazy
Edited on Fri Nov-25-11 02:06 PM by Aerows
and try to top each other on the crazy.

Ron Paul at least is *actually* intelligent, he doesn't just sound that way to an audience who thinks "Africa is a country" is a perfectly sound assertion.

That said, beyond the handful of GOOD ideas he has, he also has some VERY bad ones which completely overshadow the good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-11 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
24. I've conversed w/ him. He's getting a tiny bit addled,
and I heartily disagree with some of his (mostly domestic policy) ideas, but he's not snooty, and he IS sincere. At least he's sincere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshstart Donating Member (112 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #24
28. Sincere, really?
Edited on Sat Nov-26-11 08:28 AM by freshstart
As sincere as he was in the late 70's when he became part of a self-appointed shadow cabinet? A cabinet based on a parliamentary form of government that we don't have and even in those systems, they are ELECTED officials.
http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=bgFaAAAAIBAJ&sjid=ukoNAAAAIBAJ&pg=6913,1208676&dq=shadow+government+ron+paul&hl=en

Ron Paul is tied to Bush's associates, Jack Abramoff's associates and a bunch of people involved in the Contra scandal. He likes precious metals? Look up what his buddy Nelson Bunker Hunt did with silver. Ron Paul is a snake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prometheus Bound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #28
39. That's interesting. Can you tell me more?
I googled Ron Paul and Jack Abramoff and couldn't find anything about that.

I googled Ron Paul and the Hunt Brothers, but can't find anything.

Also, Ron Paul and the contra scandal if you can provide a link. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshstart Donating Member (112 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. I posted the Abramoff/Paul/Bandow links
Edited on Sat Nov-26-11 05:51 PM by freshstart
Look up the Conservative Caucus, you'll find the Contra/Hunt Brothers. Unfortanately I can't post everything I have because I use ProQuest and it will only spit out PDFs. Look up Lewis Lehrman, he wrote the book The Case for Gold with Ron Paul and he was an investor in Bush's Arbusto Oil. Use google news archives. Ron Paul was involved in the shadow cabinet and the Conservative Caucus, I searched those links to find the other stuff. Look at the names involved in the shadow cabinet and what those people are involved in, that is where you'll find the leads. He's not clean with those connections.

http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=oD0iAAAAIBAJ&sjid=ZawFAAAAIBAJ&pg=3197,338158&dq=howard+phillips+shadow+cabinet&hl=en

http://www.conservativeusa.org/35years.htm

http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=kadUAAAAIBAJ&sjid=hjsNAAAAIBAJ&pg=3050,4881091&dq=nelson+bunker+hunt+conservative+caucus&hl=en

Hunt/Saudis/Silver
http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=UtUcAAAAIBAJ&sjid=yF0EAAAAIBAJ&pg=1343,958398&dq=nelson+bunker+hunt+saudi+silver&hl=en

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prometheus Bound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. Thanks, I'll check it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshstart Donating Member (112 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. You're welcome
If you search my posts on here, I put in the links that I could get from the regular news archives. I'm trying to find a specific article that states the conservative caucus was behind pushing the GOP to the right. If I can track it down, I'll post it. I tracked these people back to the 70s and you'll find they were behind many things including school vouchers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshstart Donating Member (112 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-11 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #43
46. Same people behind the "shadow cabinet"
Edited on Sun Nov-27-11 01:54 PM by freshstart
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #24
30. I've heard the same from others down here - that's he's mainly old-fashioned and
has a vision of an older, simpler America. I can't argue on foreign police or medicinal marijuana, I agree with him there. He'd be better than Perry, Bachmann, Gingrich, or Palin because he's not insane. But he does not agree with any sort of social nets, which would be pretty devastating with so many out of work and seniors close to poverty as it is. I'd take Romney over him just because he's moderate and sane - which is where I put Obama as well. If I could have my choice it would be Sanders. But given the field I can't really see any of these folks beating Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HappyMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
29. No.
Paul is just as nutty as they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piratefish08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
32. he thinks the Cvil Rights Act was a bad idea.
nothing balances out that kind of assholery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
34. lol. riiight. Eyebrow toupees and all.
He's fucking batshit crazy as are all of his cultist followers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
35. Looks, not SOUNDS .... cut the Debt of EDU? Debt of Energy?
Leave the UN?

End SS and Medicare.

Overturn Roe V Wade.

He's just as crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
icnorth Donating Member (954 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
41. In comparison, Charlie McCarthy sans
Edgar Bergen would look better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
44. piss on ron paul.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC