Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ann Arbor considers ban on idling vehicles

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 09:10 AM
Original message
Ann Arbor considers ban on idling vehicles
Ann Arbor considers ban on idling vehicles

nn Arbor is considering whether to ban idling vehicles and enforce the regulation with fines.

AnnArbor.com reports the new ordinance was to be recommended to the Ann Arbor City Council tonight by the City of Ann Arbor Environmental Commission.

The proposed ordinance would make a $100 ticket the minimum punishment for a driver who leaves a vehicle running while unoccupied for any amount of time or running for five minutes while occupied. For commercial vehicles, the minimum fine would be $500.

The goal is to educate people on how idling vehicles affect the environment. Some other cities around the country have similar bans.

http://www.freep.com/article/20110815/NEWS06/110815015/Ann-Arbor-considers-ban-idling-vehicles
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. U of M has GOT to be the biggest culprit of unattended idling engines in Ann Arbor.
Bet the tickets are reserved for students and out-of-towners, though. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frazzled Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. Chicago has an Anti-Idling Law
However, I think enforcement has been relatively lax and needs improvement. It's mainly directed at the trucks and tourist buses. In part:


Doing Our Share for Cleaner Air: Idling Reduction: Chicago’s New Anti-Idling Law

City Council recently amended the City’s traffic code to limit standing (idling) of on-road diesel-powered vehicles within the City’s borders to a total of three (3) minutes within a sixty-minute period. The new idling limit will not only improve air quality, but will also result in fuel conservation. Reasons for the ordinance are:


Air Pollution
The City of Chicago is located in a US Environmental Protection Agency designated non-attainment area for particulate matter and ozone. Chicago is a hub for trucking, rail and marine transportation and relies on diesel-powered vehicles and equipment to provide critical services within the City. These diesel-powered vehicles perform crucial work in order to sustain our economy but are also a significant contributor to air pollution in the Chicago region. Unnecessary idling causes the release of a variety of pollutants, such as nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, particulate matter and other chemicals that form ground-level ozone and contribute to global warming. These pollutants aggravate respiratory ailments, cause lung damage, and lead to cancer. Read more about diesel exhaust health concerns from the US Environmental Protection Agency.


Wasted Fuel and Money
Idling wastes fuel and money. When idling, a typical diesel-powered truck burns almost a gallon of fuel per hour. Drivers that eliminate unnecessary idling can save significant dollars in fuel costs each year. For instance, by not idling 30 minutes a day for one year, a truck driver saves 125 gallons of diesel and therefore approximately $374 in fuel costs (assuming a diesel fuel price of $2.99 per gallon)—while also preventing at least 101 pounds of air pollution and 2,775 pounds of carbon dioxide from entering the atmosphere.

http://www.cityofchicago.org/city/en/depts/doe/supp_info/doing_our_share_forcleanerairidlingreduction.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. Ann Arbor Always Picks the Non-Problem
because dealing with the real problems would involve work and change and cost money...I love living here, but the people with their noses in the air infuriate me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coyote Donating Member (900 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. Not unheard of....idling vehicles are not allowed in Germany. N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
5. There's a city around here that begins with F and ends with O
If they had this law in place they'd have to ticket every car that sat at certain intersections waiting for the light to turn green.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lance_Boyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
6. Wow! A single traffic jam could fund the city for a year!
How about, you know, using *education* to educate people, not sneaky-ass revenue enhancement like this proposed bullshit?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dtexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. In a place as cold as Ann Arbor in the winter, this will likely not work.
Anyone who has to sit in a vehicle for any time in the winter will want the heater going -- and no one wants a dead battery.

Yeah, it's bad for the environment; but a winter environment can be very bad for people, too.

Glad I don't live there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shagbark Hickory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
8. Not good news for all the people up there that live in their cars.
Freeze to death or get fined.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
9. They made it illegal in my town because of so many car thefts
The thieves were treating idling cars like free taxis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
10. How about drive-through fast food joints?
Plenty of idling going on there. Fellow Big Ten city Madison considered banning them a while back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC