Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Professor Bill Quigley: Two Unasked Question in Tucson Mass Murder

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 10:25 AM
Original message
Professor Bill Quigley: Two Unasked Question in Tucson Mass Murder
January 9th, 2011 5:56 PM
Guns and Terrorism: Two Unasked Question in Tucson Mass Murder

By Bill Quigley


Question: How does a mentally unstable man who was kicked out of school and had run-ins with the law buy an assault weapon?

.......(snip).......

The US has well over 250 million guns in private hands according to the National Rifle Association. That is more, according to the BBC, than any country in the world. In one year, guns murdered 17 people in Finland, 35 in Australia, 39 in England and Wales, 60 in Spain, 194 in Germany, 200 in Canada, and 9,484 in the United States according to the Brady Campaign.

Does the US really need tens of millions of assault weapons and hundreds of millions of other guns? We already put more of our people in prison than any country in the world and we spend more on our military than all the rest of the world together. How fearful must we be?

.......(snip).......

Apparently when a mentally unstable white male is accused, terrorism is not the first thing that comes to mind.

When Clay Duke, a white male, threatened Florida school board members with a gun and shot at them before shooting himself, in December 2010, he was mentally imbalanced.

When Michael Enright, a white male, was arrested for slashing the throat of a Muslim NYC cab driver in August of 2010, his friends said he had a drinking problem. .............(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/mike-friends-blog/guns-and-terrorism



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. Mistake there: A Glock 19 is NOT an assault weapon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Schema Thing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. correction: in this case it certainly was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. In that case a baseball bat could be called an assault weapon.
But it's not one according to classification of weapons..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zoeisright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. Oh please. I am so sick of that stupid "argument".
Like that guy could have used a baseball bat to seriously wound 20 people. When will you gun lovers get over yourselves? Owning a gun is not proof of masculinity. In fact, it's the exact opposite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. I am not a gun lover
But calling a pistol an assault weapon is incorrect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. Maybe that needs to be changed. Sure doesn't look like a defensive weapon.

In fact, defensive looking weapons really aren't that popular among gun lovers. If it doesn't have that killing pizzaz, it'll be a slow seller.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #4
16. Being used in a crime is not what term "assault" means...
...when describing weapons. The term refers to the kinds of weapons used in military campaigns: compact, automatic, long guns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Schema Thing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #16
27. don't be pedantic when you've just seen a violent, gruesome assault

with a weapon tailor made for said assault.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. It's definitely a deadly weapon. ...
but I'm not being pedantic. The term "assault weapon" is a term used to create a specific impression in people's minds in order to manipulate their opinions in pursuit a specific political agenda. It's rather like how we say "estate tax" while RWers say "death tax." The RW term is inaccurate and designed to create a specific impression. A service pistol is not an assult weapon. And it was not tailor-made for mass murder, although it obviously can be used for that purpose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. News flash: guns are made for shooting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #16
28. All automatic weapons have been as tightly controlled as bombs since 1934.
No Title 1 civilian guns, including "assault weapons," are automatic.

Nor was the Glock ever considered an "assault weapon" 1994-2004, nor is it considered such now in any state, including California. Normal-capacity pistol magazines for full-sized pistols were considered "high capacity ammunition feeding devices" during the non-ban, but were not "assault weapons."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #4
25. False as to fact. Glock 19 doesn't fall into even the bogus definition
of assault weapons used by the Brady Bunch et al
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #25
34. Ok... then the question would be
How did this loony get his hands on a pistol?

You seem to be missing the point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. That can be readily answered
Because no one in a position to get his mental illness on the record chose to do it. Fear of lawsuits, HIPPA, hassle factor, etc. those that could have reported it chose not to. Perhaps he could have gotten a firearm another way, but even so they bear some responsibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lifelong Protester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. How fearful, indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. "Home of theBrave"
A LIE just like most everything relating to America..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. In America, white people can't be terrorists. Only patriots.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Desertrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
5.  ANswers #1. This is ARIZONA......#2 Duh this is Amerika
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dynasaw Donating Member (664 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
6. Loughner’s gun
was a 9mm Glock, a weapon "that is extremely easy to fire over and over, and it can carry a 30-bullet clip. It is “not suited for hunting or personal protection,” said Paul Helmke, the president of the Brady Campaign. “What it’s good for is killing and injuring a lot of people quickly. . .the law restricting their sale expired in 2004 and Congress did not have the guts to face up to the National Rifle Association and extend it."

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/10/opinion/10collins.html?src=ISMR_HP_LO_MST_FB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. What the hell is "unsuitable for personal protection" about a semi-auto 9mm?
The Brady campaign is full of idiots that know less about firearms than I do about rocket fuel.

Just like the dumbass "assault weapons" ban that had no understanding and did jack apple shit to even address the supposed issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #12
20. The first stage of the Saturn V burned kerosene...
...which produced that bright, orange flame. The second and third stages relied on liquid hydrogen. All three stages used liquid oxygen. The space shuttle uses liquid hydrogen on the orbiter's main engines and an aluminum oxide in the solid fuel boosters.

:evilgrin:

My personal weapon of choice is a semi-auto Sig 239 in 9mm which sadly cannot hold a 30-round magazine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #20
32. See, I knew that too. hehe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Remmah2 Donating Member (971 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. Quoting the Brady camapign on firearms technology is like quoting Octomom on birth control. nt
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #6
18. That would surprise the tens of thousands of civilians...
...and police officers who use Glocks for personal protection and shooting sports (though not hunting so much).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #18
29. Not tens of thousands. Millions.
The Glock has been one of the most popular civilian pistols (both LEO and non-LEO) for over two decades now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #6
22. Asinine -- No gun can protect you.
I have a 9mm and I even own a 30 shot magazine. I don't hunt, and I don't go to places where I think I need protection.

I shoot at paper targets, rotten fruit, clay pigeons, tin cans, twigs. I used the 30 round clip only once (and I know it's technically not a clip) because it is cumbersome and throws the balance of the gun off.

The Glock is favored by police departments. It's a dependable weapon. but any 9mm semi could have been used.

--imm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #6
26. More tripe from the Repuke Helmke
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
7. Look out--
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
8. He had no record.
One needs to be adjudicated incompetent for a legal weapons disability.

BTW, it was a pistol, not an assault weapon.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
9. Yet more bulshit...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
13. Simple answer: white male murderers are humanized.
Everyone else is demonized. It's discrimination to the core.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #13
21. For the record, he should get the chair. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. It's cheaper than therapy.
--imm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #23
31. Four days ago, I would have been all for therapy. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
15. Plus he was denied entry into the
military....and they take felons now. If he was denied due to 'mental issues,' that should raise a huge Red Flag and immediate mental assistance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #15
36. No, he was denied because he admitted using pot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. I read he was tested. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC