Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If we don't touch social security...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 10:02 PM
Original message
If we don't touch social security...
   ● The projected point at which the combined Trust Funds will be exhausted comes in 2036 -- one year sooner than projected last year. At that time, there will be sufficient non-interest income coming in to pay about 77 percent of scheduled benefits.

http://seniorjournal.com/NEWS/SocialSecurity/2011/20110515-SocSecTrusteesProject.htm


The projected date of HI Trust Fund exhaustion is 2024, five years earlier than estimated in last year’s report, at which time dedicated revenues would be sufficient to pay 90 percent of HI costs. The share of HI expenditures that can be financed with HI dedicated revenues is projected to decline slowly to 75 percent in 2045, and then to rise slowly, reaching 88 percent in 2085. Over 75 years, HI’s actuarial imbalance is estimated to be equivalent to 21 percent of tax receipts or 17 percent of program outlays.

The key dates regarding cash flows are shown in the following table.

KEY DATES FOR THE TRUST FUNDS
  OASI DI OASDI HI
First year outgo exceeds income excluding interesta 2017 2005 2010 2008
First year outgo exceeds income including interesta 2025 2009 2023 2008
Year trust funds are exhausted. 2038 2018 2036 2024


http://www.ssa.gov/oact/trsum/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Lift the income limit ...
BAM done ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. That's too easy. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
R. P. McMurphy Donating Member (394 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Payout increases too then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. The answer is to remove the income cap n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. You Know, Ma'am, even the Soviets Contented themselves With Five Year Plans
And they, bear in mind, reserved the right to shoot people who did not work up to snuff.

No twenty-five year prediction has ever come close to describing the reality that eventuated....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Then forget planning and just let whatever happen happen.
The thinking is that we can prevent these cuts but we can just let it be too.

Frankly 75% payout is better than I expect so I would be happy. I think it's best we all prepare for a deeper cut than that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Seriously, Ma'am: Go Examine the Record
Find in the twentieth century any period of twenty-five years in which economic predictions at its beginning were not made hash of by the passing of a quarter century.

You might as well sort through the innards of a freshly slaughtered lamb....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Yeah the predictions said we would have a surplus in the SS trust funds longer than this.
Sometimes it's worse than expected you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. You Need To Tighten Up Your Game, Ma'am
Find me an economic projection for a twenty-five year period during the last century that events did not make hash of. Pick any decade you like; you will be unable to find one.

the problem with guesses of the sort you are touting is that they are linear projections off different portions of a curve, which curve is the wave-form of a cycle of unknown frequency and amplitude. Even when made by well-intentioned people, they cannot be accurate. The change in projection you reference illustrates the problem; the earlier projection did not envision the drop in employment and slowing of economic activity presently found. The new projection sets up for the same mistake in reverse; it assumes the present malaise will continue. But the history of economic activity in the modern period is one of discontinuity, of radical shifts in technology and practices, based on breakthroughs and innovations that are by their very nature unpredictable. The fact is that no one has the slightest idea what economic conditions will be ten, fifteen, or twenty-five years from now. The only thing more foolish than pretending to such knowledge is believing people who make such a pretense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. If we don't stop waging war, well, we'll be up shit's creek without a paddle. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
10. The Trust Fund can be supplemented from the US government at any time,
as was done in 1982.

The US government can always fund its social security obligations. There is no need for a Trust Fund to begin with. The idea that a sovereign government needs to save money in a special account in order to be able to pay for future commitments is completely absurd.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. Sounds like we need more stimulus, job creation,
an end of subsidies to companies that outsource labor, and a stop to payroll tax cuts.
Those all address work force and funding issues.


Throw in an end to tax cuts for the wealthy, ending the wars and reduction of military budget and a redirection of funding for excessive "security" operations to projects encouraging innovation in emerging industries such as sustainable energy so the "crisis" situation created by these choices is resolved and not used as an excuse to raid essential social services.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pholus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 05:09 AM
Response to Original message
12. Here are some more links supporting you. You'll especially like Michelle Bachmann's comments.
Edited on Wed Jul-13-11 05:10 AM by Pholus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Seems to me you are unhappy that a government program functions precisely as intended..
with decades of success and stability and a guaranteed ability to pay its beneficiaries.

Would you prefer if people were dependent on Wall Street gamblers and con men to fund their retirements?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtown1123 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
15. Please read James Galbraith, Dean Baker, Paul Krugman and other real economists on SS. Unrec
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC