Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

No 'him' or 'her'; preschool fights gender bias

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
IndyPragmatist Donating Member (556 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 07:50 AM
Original message
No 'him' or 'her'; preschool fights gender bias
No 'him' or 'her'; preschool fights gender bias
By JENNY SOFFEL, Associated Press – Sun Jun 26, 11:40 am ET
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110626/ap_on_re_eu/eu_fea_sweden_gender_neutral_tots

STOCKHOLM – At the "Egalia" preschool, staff avoid using words like "him" or "her" and address the 33 kids as "friends" rather than girls and boys.

From the color and placement of toys to the choice of books, every detail has been carefully planned to make sure the children don't fall into gender stereotypes.

"Society expects girls to be girlie, nice and pretty and boys to be manly, rough and outgoing," says Jenny Johnsson, a 31-year-old teacher. "Egalia gives them a fantastic opportunity to be whoever they want to be."

The taxpayer-funded preschool which opened last year in the liberal Sodermalm district of Stockholm for kids aged 1 to 6 is among the most radical examples of Sweden's efforts to engineer equality between the sexes from childhood onward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cid_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. Ugh...
Yet again folks are trying to make things the same that just aren't. There are differences between men and women and that is a good thing...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. On the other hand- there are some kids, gay and straight, who just don't fall into the
usual patterns. This will let them follow their hearts without pressure to be something they aren't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
20. It is not that they are trying to erase differences that do, and always will, exist.
They are trying to erase the enculturation that has built up about those differences.

Boys will be boys. Girls will be girls. But there is nothing that says boys can't cook and design clothes, or that girls can't drive trucks or join the infantry without losing their gender identity.

Do you really think any of these kids is going to grow up not knowing if they are male or female? The real problem, for some, appears to be that they will not grow up thinking they are better than someone else because of their gender.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think this is pretty silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
4. This is just silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueamy66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
5. just stupid
what the hell is going on in our world?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
6. OMG! Think of the children! No more boys and girls!
It's an apocalyptic attack on families and the religion! This is where all those nude beaches in the 1950's has taken us!


I think Sweden can deal with 'radical' experiments in gender neutrality for 33 kids in daycare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. uh, how do you get to OMG from comments that posit this is silly?
no one is saying they can't do it. Excellent little strawperson though. cute as all get out in a gender neutral kind of way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. I'm sure
I don't know what to say in response to offense at mockery of the gravity that might have guided this sillyness into international news.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
7. For Christ's sake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
One_Life_To_Give Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
8. Need this here even more
This isn't about forcing kids to be gender neutral. It's about not beating the crap out of, or ostracizing the few who don't fit nicely into everyone else's description of what a boy or girl is. It's time we put a stop to the business of inflicting violence on anyone who doesn't behave identical to 80% of their gender.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
10. The posting rules prohibit me from using the adjective that came to mind
Let's just call that idea intellectually challenged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
11. that's awesome
I'm getting tired of how my daughter's preschool teachers assume...

*she likes pink
*she prefers to play with other girls instead of boys
*she'd rather play with dolls than trucks

Some of these things are true to varying degrees, but she needs to find her own way instead of being pushed down a "gender-appropriate" path.

Her teacher told me at the latest conference that my daughter loves to color with Brianna and Claire, but every time I pick her up, she's at the computer with Xander and Spencer, whom she calls "her little buddies."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NV Whino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
13. I think it's a great idea
No stigma for little Sven playing with dolls, nor little greta playing with trucks. I like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surrealAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
14. Is this any easier to do in Swedish than it is in English?
In English it would lead to some awfully convoluted language which would be very difficult for teachers to maintain.

It's a good idea not push children into stereotypical behavior. I'm just not sure altering our language is a practical means of achieving that end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLPanhandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
15. It won't work.
Edited on Mon Jun-27-11 09:56 AM by FLPanhandle
Studies and experiments of children has already shown that it doesn't matter what the toys are, boys and girls play differently with the same toy. So, the focus on what the toys are and what color they are isn't going to change playtime.

For example in one study gave young boys "feminine" toys and they played catch with dolls or piled up toys to knock down. The girls were given trucks and cars, and they ended up giving them personalities and building a social structure with the toys.

I figure this will yield the same results as previous studies and efforts at this same thing.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. a question about these studies
Did all boys respond exactly the same way? And did all girls respond exactly the same way?

Or did boys and girls each show a range of behaviors with different means but some degree of overlap?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLPanhandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. I'm sure there was a range
No human study is without some range. The mean behavior difference was striking though. The premise that by changing the toys they can change behavior is too simplistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
One_Life_To_Give Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. What is the goal of the school?
You are right that most kids will ply as they always did. It's the ones who are not always inclined to traditional activities that stand to benefit from this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
16. Great concept. It will be interesting to see how these kids grow up.
I don't think people realize the extent our gender roles are socialized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
17. That's awesome.
The degree to which even the simplest, most apparently neutral things are gendered for young kids is absolutely rediculous. Look in the toy aisle- they have pink and blue lego buckets. They have the same freakin' lego in them, but the reason for two colors is that a significant number of people wouldn't buy them for girls when they only came in a blue bucket. Almost every toy is gendered like that, and kids are VERY aware of it from a young age. It's very easy to declare it innate, but how on earth can we do so when our "evidence" for such a thing is the behavior of children raised in a sexist society?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
18. I think this is pretty cool
Let children use their imagination and play without having to worry about being made fun. Sounds pretty cool to me. In fact, I wish this was done at my preschool when I was growing up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lizzie Poppet Donating Member (255 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
19. /rolleyes
Spectacularly idiotic. Gender equality doesn't derive from pretending that sexual differentiation doesn't exist. It derives from ensuring that those differences don't create unequal opportunities and treatment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. Chicken, meet egg.
The problem is the enculturation of gender difference begins so young that by the time you begin educating on ensuring those differences don't create unequal opportunities and treatment, they have been making broad gender-based decision for years - you are faced with educating against what is virtually instinctual. Better to not develop those modes of treating with others first, so they don't develop the engrained attitudes that you will later have to educate against.

Test it out yourself. Get a bunch of kids together and ask two questions.

1) Are girls and boys different?

2) Is it better to be a girl or a boy?

Most kids will answer 1: yes. It is obvious even at preschool ages that boys and girls are different.

But it is the CULTURE that decides if it is better to be a boy or a girl. Virtually all boys and many girls in our culture will say it is better to be a boy than a girl - in intellectual and emotional shorthand, boys are better than girls. It's hard to change attitudes imbued in people since before they became rational persons. The intellectual arguments are hard pressed to overcome the feelings rooted in their core "but I DESERVE more than she does - I'm a BOY".

OTOH, if they are taught equality from the earliest possible moment, and that teaching is backed up with neutral language that reinforces the teaching, it will be difficult to UN-teach them later in life when they enter the wider, discriminatory world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLPanhandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. Disagree on children saying "it is better to be a boy"
At least I haven't seen that with my daughters and their friends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
25. This is stupid beyond belief...
Teacher, what is that thing between Johnny's legs..

It's a "reproductive organ", just like your "reproductive organ". Same thing just some people have an innie and others have an outie. We are all the same :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
27. Girls have the opportunity to be manly, rough and outgoing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC