Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Republican Reps Ask FCC to Officially Scrap Fairness Doctrine

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-11 02:14 PM
Original message
Republican Reps Ask FCC to Officially Scrap Fairness Doctrine
Source: Broadcasting & Cable

Fred Upton (R-Mich.) and Greg Walden (R- Ore.), the chairs of the House Energy & Commerce Committee and Communications Subcommittee, respectively, have asked the FCC to get the fairness doctrine and a couple of their corollaries off the books, pointing to President Obama's directive earlier this year to federal agencies to review outdated regs still on the books.

In a letter to FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski, the legislators give the FCC until the end of the week (June 3) to confirm that it will remove the doctrine and corollaries from the Code of Federal Regulations.

The issue came up after Republican FCC Commissioner Robert McDowell pointed out in a speech that, although the FCC ruled back in 1987 that the doctrine was unconstitutional and unenforceable, the doctrine remained in the Code of Federal Regulations, which meant essentially it was teed up if a future commission decided to enforce it.

... The chairman has said he has no interest in reinstating the doctrine, and the President has echoed that sentiment. But it has remained a perceived threat to some Republicans, particularly given that some powerful Democrats in Congress, including Senate Communication Subcommittee Chairman John Kerry (D-Mass.), have in the past suggested it should be revived as a counter to conservative talk radio, whose rise coincided with the doctrine's demise.

Read more: http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/469013-Republican_Reps_Ask_FCC_to_Officially_Scrap_Fairness_Doctrine.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-11 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. It is technically dead anyway - evidence: FOX
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-11 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. It was removed back in 1987.
Much ado about nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonhomme Richard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-11 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. Just the idea of the word "fair" is outrageous to repugs. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-11 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. We need to bring back the Fairness in Broadcasting Act --
However, we may be reaching the tipping point in the other direction now

where right wingers have made their agenda clear enough to make the public nauseous?

Sadly, however, during the time we were waiting for that to happen a great deal of

damage has been done!! Much of it perhaps unrepairable?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-11 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. There are parts to the F.D. that every American needs. One is verified accuracy.
The Fairness Doctrine was a policy of the United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC), introduced in 1949, that required the holders of broadcast licenses to both present controversial issues of public importance and to do so in a manner that was, in the Commission's view, honest, equitable and balanced. The 1949 Commission Report served as the foundation for the Fairness Doctrine since it had previously established two more forms of regulation onto broadcasters. These two duties were to provide adequate coverage to public issues and that coverage must be fair in reflecting opposing views.<1> The Fairness Doctrine should not be confused with the Equal Time rule.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairness_Doctrine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC