Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

We were attacked on 9/11 because the Shrub was installed into office

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
sharesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 01:09 AM
Original message
We were attacked on 9/11 because the Shrub was installed into office
by friends of his father on SCOTUS.

I know I was ticked off by that bullshit.

I can barely imagine how ticked off Bin Laden must have been.

Shrub was the son of the man who permanently stationed U.S. troops on the Arabian Peninsula.

That was Bin Laden's number one grievance against the USA, according to him.

Bin Laden was assuredly a dick for not letting his objection remain in the realm of rhetoric.

So he got what he deserved for being a villianous slimeball.

But installing the Shrub brought everything to shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Iwasthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. You are correct! Few know that too
He didn't attack us because of our freedoms, it was out footprint on their land(s). The Bush's are responsible for more than a million innocents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. I doubt it. Remember the 1998 US embassy bombings in Africa? Or the USS Cole?
Edited on Mon May-02-11 01:23 AM by Spider Jerusalem
That was al-Qaeda, and Bin Laden, and it was before Bush was elected, while Clinton was still in office. The attacks of September 2001 probably would have happened regardless of who was president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Those were serious attacks, it's true.
But 9/11 was a rachet up. For a reason intended to be unequivocal.

Disapproval of whom and how.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Because bombing embassies and trying to sink destroyers means they really like you?
Please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Order of magnitude, and on the homeland.
Installation of the Shrub is the explanation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Not really, no
also "homeland" sounds extremely creepy and, well. Un-American. "On American soil" doesn't have the fascist overtones. And the 9/11 bombing had been in the planning stages for quite a while. See here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11_attacks#Planning_of_the_attacks

Notice anything about the dates? Clinton was President. Still would've happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Yeah, but Bush intentionally let security go to shit, because he knew if an attack happened...
...he'd have all sorts of power. 9/11 was just an epic attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
16. I don't agree with that
the successful attack required a large number of critical dependencies in order to ensure maximum carnage. Complex plans very often fail.

We very nearly lived in the worst possible timeline minus the airplane that crashed in a farm field. Nine months of a Gore presidency would have altered events in many many inperceptible ways. Plus the fact daily security briefs would have been read does not lead me to believe 9/11 was predestined to occur.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
7. Baloney!
The attacks were being planned since at least 1998, while W was still executing mentally retarded people.

Clinton could have just as easily been at the helm when it occurred.

Osama's fatwa about the troops was issued in 1996 and again in 1998.


There's no need to make everything about partisan politics. It helps none of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Order of magnitude, and on the homeland.
Installation of the Shrub is the reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. Targets were selected long before that.
Don't give me that "order of magnitude" crap.

This is something you've convinced yourself you believe without any regard to the facts to back it up. There's no reason to spread this nonsense.

For example, the hijacker with the commercial pilots license, Hani Hanjour, arrived in San Diego on Dec. 8th 2000. The installation of Shrub occurred the 9th of December, 2000.

He didn't come in on "standby". The wheels were in motion.

You should be embarrassed to be peddling this shit, really, because what it reveals is your ignorance in thinking that the rest of the world really shares your strong feelings about Clinton, Bush and Obama.

The jihad isn't pro-Dems, for the love of god!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. It's well known that Bush let security go, there were reports of planes being considered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. Clinton was informed of the intent to attack in the US in December of 1998. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
11. Jesus fucking Christ.
This place sometimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 05:46 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. Shrub was the reason.........nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brother Buzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
13. I understand Shrub's "carpet of gold or carpet of bombs" foreign policy lit the match
Unocal, Enron, et al., had a wicked cool pipe dream back in 2001
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 03:07 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Ding! Grand prize winner. -nt
Edited on Mon May-02-11 03:08 AM by crickets
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 05:43 AM
Response to Original message
18. No question about it.....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 05:55 AM
Response to Original message
20. I contend that...
George W Bush's instillation by the SCOTUS, set the stage for the calamity and chaos that the old ones foresaw for the year 2000.

Bush was the mother of all millennium bugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC