|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
sharesunited (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-02-11 01:09 AM Original message |
We were attacked on 9/11 because the Shrub was installed into office |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iwasthere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-02-11 01:17 AM Response to Original message |
1. You are correct! Few know that too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spider Jerusalem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-02-11 01:23 AM Response to Original message |
2. I doubt it. Remember the 1998 US embassy bombings in Africa? Or the USS Cole? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-02-11 01:25 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sharesunited (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-02-11 01:32 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Those were serious attacks, it's true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spider Jerusalem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-02-11 01:34 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Because bombing embassies and trying to sink destroyers means they really like you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sharesunited (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-02-11 01:37 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Order of magnitude, and on the homeland. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spider Jerusalem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-02-11 01:50 AM Response to Reply #6 |
12. Not really, no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-02-11 01:46 AM Response to Reply #2 |
9. Yeah, but Bush intentionally let security go to shit, because he knew if an attack happened... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wuushew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-02-11 02:00 AM Response to Reply #2 |
16. I don't agree with that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toucano (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-02-11 01:40 AM Response to Original message |
7. Baloney! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sharesunited (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-02-11 01:42 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Order of magnitude, and on the homeland. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toucano (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-02-11 01:51 AM Response to Reply #8 |
14. Targets were selected long before that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-02-11 01:47 AM Response to Reply #7 |
10. It's well known that Bush let security go, there were reports of planes being considered. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toucano (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-02-11 01:53 AM Response to Reply #10 |
15. Clinton was informed of the intent to attack in the US in December of 1998. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-02-11 01:49 AM Response to Original message |
11. Jesus fucking Christ. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-02-11 05:46 AM Response to Reply #11 |
19. Shrub was the reason.........nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brother Buzz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-02-11 01:51 AM Response to Original message |
13. I understand Shrub's "carpet of gold or carpet of bombs" foreign policy lit the match |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crickets (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-02-11 03:07 AM Response to Reply #13 |
17. Ding! Grand prize winner. -nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-02-11 05:43 AM Response to Original message |
18. No question about it.....nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hubert Flottz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-02-11 05:55 AM Response to Original message |
20. I contend that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:14 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC