Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Government has PROFITED 16 billion so far from TARP.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 07:16 PM
Original message
Government has PROFITED 16 billion so far from TARP.

Those that have accused this administration of "handing over tax payer dollars to bankers and CEOs" are seriously running out of ammo.


Earlier Wednesday, Citigroup /quotes/comstock/13*!c/quotes/nls/c (C 3.29, -0.05, -1.50%) and Wells Fargo /quotes/comstock/13*!wfc/quotes/nls/wfc (WFC 26.81, -0.04, -0.15%) said they repaid $45 billion that they got from TARP. That brings the total amount repaid into the program to $164 billion, the Treasury explained. Read about Citi and Wells repayments.

Total repayments by TARP banks should top $175 billion by the end of 2010, cutting taxpayer exposure to the sector by three-quarters, the Treasury estimated.


"Taxpayers have already received over $16 billion in profits from all TARP programs and that profit could be considerably higher as the Treasury sells additional warrants in the weeks ahead," the Treasury said in a statement.


http://www.marketwatch.com/story/tarp-profit-at-least-16-bln-so-far-treasury-2009-12-23?reflink=MW_news_stmp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Blackwater money for their WARS. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. You people sound like broken records (playing really, really bad music).
Most likely disco.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. I LOVE disco!!!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
22. Screeching bad, monotonous disco.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Oh, honeybunny, time to dance!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KrR Donating Member (237 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. So when one poutrage is disproved
You just move on to another with no acknowledgement?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #12
23. I don't understand. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bodhi BloodWave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #23
35. *ding ding ding* We have a winning comment n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. It's my bully deflection. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #12
34. They are 'repaying' it by being given massive tax cuts
U.S. gave up billions in tax money in deal for Citigroup's bailout repayment

The federal government quietly agreed to forgo billions of dollars in potential tax payments from Citigroup as part of the deal announced this week to wean the company from the massive taxpayer bailout that helped it survive the financial crisis.

The Internal Revenue Service on Friday issued an exception to long-standing tax rules for the benefit of Citigroup and a few other companies partially owned by the government. As a result, Citigroup will be allowed to retain billions of dollars worth of tax breaks that otherwise would decline in value when the government sells its stake to private investors.

While the Obama administration has said taxpayers are likely to profit from the sale of the Citigroup shares, accounting experts said the lost tax revenue could easily outstrip those profits.

The IRS, an arm of the Treasury Department, has changed a number of rules during the financial crisis to reduce the tax burden on financial firms. The rule changed Friday also was altered last fall by the Bush administration to encourage mergers, letting Wells Fargo cut billions of dollars from its tax bill by buying the ailing Wachovia.

...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2009/12/15/ST2009121505381.html?sid=ST2009121505381
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DontTreadOnMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. Meanwhile ONE MILLION home foreclosures for 2009
They fixed the leak in the yacht, but alot of rowboats went to the bottom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm not going to confront you at all.
Please just remember that I expressed my doubts when/if this house of cards comes crashing down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. You mean the house of cards where the economy is saved and tax payers get their money back?
I know, you hate it right. Thats why it must feel SOOO good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. You might not remember my name, but you'll remember my avatar.
Chicken Little expresses his extreme skepticism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Hehe, ok, catching on now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. No, the sentiment is real.
The avatar is a reaction to being called a "chicken little" so much here at DU that I decided to own it.

I really do think we're headed for a world of financial hurt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #18
41. I chose Jane Curtain in the shower
Because my post attract a certain subset of DU to them with the long knives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. Appropriate!
You really DO seem to be the messenger everybody sharpens their knives for :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. I used to be one of them
That pisses them off more than anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. Welcome to the dark side.
...and by "dark", I mean "rational".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #41
48. Jane Curtin?? Ummm, that's Janet Leigh ... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 05:19 AM
Response to Reply #48
53. Oops
:blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. I read on Yahoo News today that TARP is coming $200B under projected costs under Pres. Obama.
Edited on Wed Dec-23-09 07:20 PM by ClarkUSA
BushCo had no strings attached. Pres. Obama attached plenty in 2/09, including 5% interest.

Thanks for the FACTS. As a taxpayer, I like Pres. Obama's stewardship of the economy BushCo nearly ruined beyond repair.

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Schema Thing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
30. remind me what happened wrt TARP in 2/09?

no snark here. just don't remember.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. Right...what about the other $350 billion that disappeared?
Tell you what, give me 700 trillion dollars and I'll pay back $200 billion + interest.

Better than we'll ever get back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Um, the whole 700 billion hasn't even been spent and you are forgetting the job saving auto bailout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #11
55. I agreed with the auto bailout
But I didn't agree with the first $350 billion, and I bet we never get that back, or any real benefit from it. I bet we lose another $200 billion on top of that, which would put my proposal on top with what I offered to pay back with interest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. Please educate yourself. It's MULIPLE TRILLIONS at the expense of taxpayers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Please learn basic mathematical comparisons. At most, its 700 billion and thats less than multiple..
...trillions. LOL, thats the kind of bullshit I love though, I can almost FEEL the foam spitting out of your mouth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
26. re. "foam spitting" - lol, pure projection on your part.

but whatever. :shrug: like i said, educate yourself. the measly $700 billion is a tiny fraction of what it actually cost (and continues to cost) the taxpayers in terms of bailing out the finance industry.

otoh, ignorance is bliss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #14
28. lol, enjoy your stay.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tranche Donating Member (913 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
24. The OP is talking about TARP. You're problably trying to ad
up the costs of ALL the bailout initiatives, including Fed actions. Or maybe you're talking about the value of the derivatives market. Who knows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. "You're problably trying to ad up the costs of ALL the bailout initiatives, including Fed actions."

I was, actually. Thanks for a correction, I was not thinking in terms of just that single bailout initiative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. Did you figure in Citigroups multi-billion dollar tax break?
When included, we (the American people) lost money on the deal. Citigroup got a $38 billion tax break, which far exceeds what they borrowed and paid back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. We put up 700 billion, we are getting most of that back, end of story.
If you have a problem with citigroup getting a tax break, thats a separate issue, whether you like it or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #15
27. And we'll spend it all on WAR. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #15
31. MOST, not ALL. Just MOST.
Not good enough.

Not the end of the story. Thanks for playing. Next!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #15
40. No it is not a seperate issue
because the tax break was not through legislation, it was through rule interpretation by the department that was collecting their TARP payments. Fuck, why are people so stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #40
56. Its a different issue because it wasn't money loaned/granted.
I know you are feeling very butt hurt that your TARP related talking points are being stripped away from you, annihilated and rendered useless to your anti-Obama agenda, fucking cry about it, might make you feel better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
39. No they don't count that
Nor do they count the similar tax breaks that will be discovered at the other banks. This TARP thing was fraud when it was enacted and is fraud now and the Government is trying to find a way to save face over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
17. ALL the money has been paid back PLUS $16 billion extra? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Something like that, the treasury is getting paid dividends on some of the tarp money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Today Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
21. It would be a heck of a lot more if they weren't making forgiveness deals to Citi
and then who else down the road now that the precedence has been set.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
32. Wrong. The taxpayer is still in-the-red for at least $43 billion from TARP
Edited on Wed Dec-23-09 08:36 PM by brentspeak


http://www.forbes.com/2009/12/21/tarp-banking-pnc-business-washington-tarp.html

WASHINGTON -- When Wells Fargo and Citigroup's TARP repayment checks finally clear, America's banks will have paid back $146 billion of the $205 billion taxpayers lent them during the banking crisis. Which means there's still $59 billion waiting to come back (not to mention the special assistance to AIG and the auto industry, which may never be returned).

When will it be repaid? No time soon...


If the $146 billion paid back yielded a $16 billion dividend payment, that still leaves $59 billion - $16 billion = $43 billion the ledger requires to return to in-the-black. One hasn't made a "profit" until revenue exceeds expenses paid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. It may be less than that...
Rolled into the cost of TARP was the assumption that the servicing of these debts would cost more than it actually did -- it's less because the funds were paid back earlier. Nearly $80 billion in projected interest costs were eliminated by the early repayments so part of the "profit" is actually just costs that were avoided. In any case, this is good news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ipaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
33. Good, can we use 14 billion to fund health care centers and dump the shitty ins. reform? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
38. Such Utter Bullshit
Edited on Wed Dec-23-09 09:55 PM by AllentownJake
It has been revealed that Citigroup was given tax breaks through rule interpretations, as far as TARP is concerned there is a giant fucking accounting shell game going on that would be able to be figured out by a first year auditor with a C average.

I'm sure in the coming months we'll hear all the banks got similar deals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jb24 Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
45. Woohoo! Mission accomplished!
Only if you forget about the trillions of dollars of damage wreaked upon the economy through their fraudulent "financial engineering" schemes and dodgy derivatives, not to mention the social cost...who cares about whatever puny amount of 'profit' we make if no strict financial regulation of derivatives and other financial products is enacted? The same thing will keep happening over and over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. There is no profit
The government gave special tax cuts which makes the debt owed just go away, as if it has been paid back.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2009/12/15/ST2009121505381.html?sid=ST2009121505381

Just another scam on the American people
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
46. Holy Accounting Silliness, Batman!
Sure, if you only count what's been paid back. If you count the entire thing, it's extraordinarily unlikely to do anything but lose a torrent of money.

And TARP is only a small fraction of all the banker handouts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
49. The "let it fail" brigade doesn't want to hear that it worked...

...they didn't WANT the economy saved.


They wanted it to collapse...because they feel that's the only way to bring about a socialist utopia.


Any success story hurts their end game.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcablue Donating Member (625 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
50. The heatline says "Treasury says" that a 16 bil. profit has been made
Geithner's agency says so. It must be true!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeanpalmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 02:31 AM
Response to Original message
51. Plus the credit card giveaway
Edited on Thu Dec-24-09 02:35 AM by jeanpalmer
They'll reap trillions off that. Of course, that was the intent.

Also, the Fed bought $1.3 trillion of mortgage-backed securities from them. I'm sure we'll make a profit on those.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeanpalmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 02:39 AM
Response to Original message
52. Plus the $50 billion
funneled to them through AIG. It's not coming back, it's already been paid out in bonuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 05:42 AM
Response to Original message
54. The numbers can be debated but clearly the program has worked and
it has not been a catatrophic complete waste of money as many had predicted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC