|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
![]() |
Onlooker
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 07:44 PM Original message |
What the hell is going on? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
atreides1
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 07:48 PM Response to Original message |
1. Well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
golfguru
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 07:50 PM Response to Original message |
2. Still lot better than the Teabagger bill passed by House n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 07:55 PM Response to Reply #2 |
10. You can't possibly be serious in suggesting that this would be acceptable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
golfguru
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 08:55 PM Response to Reply #10 |
37. Please explain how Obama gets a better bill with House |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
michaz
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 08:26 PM Response to Reply #2 |
26. It may be "Better" but not at all acceptable. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
golfguru
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 10:04 PM Response to Reply #26 |
64. OK, but there was an election in 2010 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dawgs
![]() |
Thu Jul-21-11 12:24 PM Response to Reply #64 |
87. Leadership. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
golfguru
![]() |
Thu Jul-21-11 03:53 PM Response to Reply #87 |
89. Lot's of luck! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dept of Beer
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 08:38 PM Response to Reply #2 |
31. Getting one hand lopped off is definitely better |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cannikin
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
3. I'm admitting to myself that the President is not the highest authority in this country. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solomon
![]() |
Thu Jul-21-11 01:29 PM Response to Reply #3 |
88. You said it. Some of them fight against it to the point of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
5X
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
4. Reads like a republican wet dream. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorthCarolina
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
5. Right wing plant is possible. Elect a Republican posing as a Democrat, and see how far Democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissDeeds
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 08:33 PM Response to Reply #5 |
27. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 08:40 PM Response to Reply #5 |
33. Deleted message |
OHdem10
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 07:52 PM Response to Original message |
6. Obama is a "New" Democrat (DLC, Third Way Centrist) and the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 07:54 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. That's a false statement. President Obama rejected the DLC while still a Senator. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 07:56 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Are you personally for or against raising the retirement age for social security? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 07:59 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 08:02 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Deleted message |
no limit
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 08:07 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Are you personally for or against raising the retirement age for social security? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 08:11 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Deleted message |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 08:21 PM Response to Reply #18 |
23. I believe in the Democratic Party's and this liberal Democratic President's legislative efforts... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 08:18 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. I am not interested in far-fetched hypotheticals. When you have facts to offer, let me know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorthCarolina
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 09:06 PM Response to Reply #20 |
40. Dodge...but not particularly a clever one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 09:11 PM Response to Reply #40 |
43. Why are you making a personal attack against me? Are you sore because I proved you wrong AGAIN? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorthCarolina
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 09:13 PM Response to Reply #43 |
47. I know it's the truth. That's why I'm not sure why you don't just cop to it. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 09:18 PM Response to Reply #47 |
50. Yes, it's the truth that you made a personal attack against me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorthCarolina
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 09:19 PM Response to Reply #50 |
54. Calling a spade a spade is a personal attack now? Get a life please. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 09:25 PM Response to Reply #54 |
58. That's another personal attack. Do you enjoy denigrating Obama supporters? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 09:11 PM Response to Reply #20 |
44. What facts? I simply asked you a question about your personal opinion on a matter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 09:15 PM Response to Reply #44 |
49. "what facts?" Exactly... what facts are you referring to? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 09:18 PM Response to Reply #49 |
51. I am asking you a simple question. How could you possibly not understand what Im asking you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 09:19 PM Response to Reply #51 |
53. Here's my opinion of your nagging me for an opinion. ----> |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 09:21 PM Response to Reply #53 |
56. I don't think I need to say anymore. Have a good one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorthCarolina
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 09:25 PM Response to Reply #56 |
57. To tell you the truth would break his/her "cover". Your question was perfectly clear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 09:25 PM Response to Reply #57 |
59. What "cover" are you referring to? I don't need a "cover" to be an Obama supporter at DU. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui
![]() |
Thu Jul-21-11 10:20 AM Response to Reply #59 |
82. They may be suggesting that you are not at liberty to post your |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
secondwind
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 09:12 PM Response to Reply #16 |
46. AMEN. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorthCarolina
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 08:39 PM Response to Reply #9 |
32. Give it up will ya please. Obama himself has declared that he is a New Dem. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 08:44 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. Why are once again stating that falsehood when I proved you wrong once already on another OP? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorthCarolina
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 09:01 PM Response to Reply #34 |
38. In your dreams. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 09:06 PM Response to Reply #38 |
41. In my dreams, all PUMAs, freeper trolls, and Koch Bros. funded astroturf would not be insane. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorthCarolina
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 09:12 PM Response to Reply #41 |
45. This "Liberal" President? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 09:20 PM Response to Reply #45 |
55. Yes, I am "disconnected" from the world of PUMAs, freeper trolls, and paid Koch Bros. astroturf. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair
![]() |
Thu Jul-21-11 09:48 AM Response to Reply #9 |
80. Then won as a "Progressive" and immediately packed his cabinet with DLC people. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui
![]() |
Thu Jul-21-11 10:18 AM Response to Reply #9 |
81. Yet stacked his cabinet with DLCers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC
![]() |
Thu Jul-21-11 04:03 PM Response to Reply #81 |
91. He just hired all of 'em so that he could keep an eye on 'em |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 08:20 PM Response to Reply #6 |
22. Maybe you missed this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Palmer Eldritch
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 10:06 PM Response to Reply #6 |
67. Why make up complete bullshit? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Faryn Balyncd
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 07:52 PM Response to Original message |
7. K and R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TBMASE
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 07:53 PM Response to Original message |
8. Well, now, we can't have the taxpayers subsidizing peoples homes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kaleva
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 07:58 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. If it eliminates deductions on 2nd homes and caps deductions for McMansions, I'm fine with it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TBMASE
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 08:01 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. why subsidize anyone's home? They bought it, they pay for it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
customerserviceguy
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 10:57 PM Response to Reply #15 |
68. Same here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tex-wyo-dem
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 11:10 PM Response to Reply #15 |
70. Why provide tax breaks on mortgages? Because... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TBMASE
![]() |
Thu Jul-21-11 04:56 AM Response to Reply #70 |
74. Yeah, we heard that same reasoning when subprimes became all the rage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bornskeptic
![]() |
Thu Jul-21-11 12:00 PM Response to Reply #70 |
86. Most taxpayers in the bottom 60% of the income range get little or no benefit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mojorabbit
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 08:36 PM Response to Reply #12 |
30. I read on an earlier thread there is some fine print ro beware of. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kaleva
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 08:48 PM Response to Reply #30 |
36. Yes, most of us are just guessing right now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
golfguru
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 09:01 PM Response to Reply #12 |
39. Exactly....capping deductions for McMansions won't hurt poor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andy823
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 07:59 PM Response to Original message |
13. Well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woolldog
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 08:14 PM Response to Original message |
19. Just the fact that the President is toying with this idea, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woolldog
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 08:20 PM Response to Original message |
21. I love one of the comments after the article: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Igel
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 08:21 PM Response to Original message |
24. A mortgage deduction on the first $500k of your mortgage isn't enough? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
golfguru
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 09:11 PM Response to Reply #24 |
42. +1000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorthCarolina
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 08:23 PM Response to Original message |
25. Lost his mind? No. Showing his true allegiance? Yes. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 08:46 PM Response to Reply #25 |
35. What "his true allegiance?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 09:33 PM Response to Reply #25 |
62. Why are you dodging my question? Why don't you just cop to it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorthCarolina
![]() |
Thu Jul-21-11 07:56 AM Response to Reply #62 |
78. His true allegiance should be obvious to any non-comatose individual... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissDeeds
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 08:34 PM Response to Original message |
28. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 08:35 PM Response to Original message |
29. Which one is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 09:15 PM Response to Original message |
48. This would be a good time for the ardent "my President can do no wrong" to come out of hiding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorthCarolina
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 09:19 PM Response to Reply #48 |
52. Now THAT would be a mistake. Isn't this the President that solicited the public to Hold His Feet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 09:26 PM Response to Reply #52 |
60. It would be a mistake to ask them if they really know what he is doing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Thu Jul-21-11 06:51 AM Response to Reply #48 |
77. Deleted message |
sofa king
![]() |
Thu Jul-21-11 10:23 AM Response to Reply #48 |
85. You rang? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CakeGrrl
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 09:29 PM Response to Original message |
61. Come back when this is finalized and signed. -nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WingDinger
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 10:00 PM Response to Original message |
63. Wrote a song about it, and it goes like this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 10:05 PM Response to Original message |
65. Deleted message |
CakeGrrl
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 11:27 PM Response to Reply #65 |
72. So you won't be here when he's the nominee in 2012, then? -nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Palmer Eldritch
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 10:06 PM Response to Original message |
66. in 2 weeks you'll be looking for a new outrage. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Honeycombe8
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 11:08 PM Response to Reply #66 |
69. Looks like people don't have to look that hard. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Palmer Eldritch
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 11:12 PM Response to Reply #69 |
71. Not when there are so many imaginary things they can pull out of their asses. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Honeycombe8
![]() |
Wed Jul-20-11 11:52 PM Response to Reply #71 |
73. There you go, again. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui
![]() |
Thu Jul-21-11 10:21 AM Response to Reply #71 |
83. Welcome back to DU! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar
![]() |
Thu Jul-21-11 09:46 PM Response to Reply #66 |
93. So true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blkmusclmachine
![]() |
Thu Jul-21-11 05:21 AM Response to Original message |
75. The WH is burnishing its GOP creds: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tennessee Gal
![]() |
Thu Jul-21-11 05:55 AM Response to Original message |
76. There are some extremist posts here. Look at the details. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science
![]() |
Thu Jul-21-11 09:44 AM Response to Reply #76 |
79. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science
![]() |
Thu Jul-21-11 10:23 AM Response to Original message |
84. You are arguing on the Orwell board. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Thu Jul-21-11 09:49 PM Response to Reply #84 |
94. Really, it's been fascinating to watch how it happens. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion
![]() |
Thu Jul-21-11 03:55 PM Response to Original message |
90. It also undoes the Bush tax cuts and makes the doctor fix permanent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar
![]() |
Thu Jul-21-11 09:45 PM Response to Original message |
92. There is a Republican Congress, that is what is going on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Aug 31st 2024, 11:50 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC