Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama signs executive order opening door wide open for Wall St. to gut gov't regulations

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 04:56 PM
Original message
Obama signs executive order opening door wide open for Wall St. to gut gov't regulations
Edited on Tue Jan-18-11 05:01 PM by brentspeak


http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2011/01/18/obama-orders-regulation-review/

Obama orders regulation review
Jan 18, 2011
President Obama, in his latest effort to patch frayed relations with businesses, signed an http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/01/18/improving-regulation-and-regulatory-review-executive-order">executive order Tuesday intended to "strike the right balance" between health, safety and environmental regulations and economic growth.

The president, in an op-ed piece in the Wall Street Journal, wrote that his order will prompt "a government-wide review of the rules already on the books to remove outdated regulations that stifle job creation and make our economy less competitive."

"It's a review that will help bring order to regulations that have become a patchwork of overlapping rules, the result of tinkering by administrations and legislators of both parties and the influence of special interests in Washington over decades," Obama wrote.

The business world has locked horns with the Obama administration over such legislation as health care and financial reform that the president signed into law last year. In his annual State of American Business address on Jan. 11, U.S. Chamber of Commerce President Tom Donohue targeted the "web of red tape" in health care, financial reform and energy regulation as holding back economic recovery.


The Republicans and the US Chamber of Offshoring American Jobs are http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2011/01/republicans-favor-obamas-plan-to-review-regulations/1">gushing over this:



http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2011/01/republicans-favor-obamas-plan-to-review-regulations/1

Kudos have come from key House Republicans: Speaker John Boehner, Majority Leader Eric Cantor and Rep. Darrell Issa, who chairs the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. They actually went further -- and claimed credit for having the idea first.

Brendan Buck, a spokesman for Boehner, called it "a welcome acknowledgement that government regulations do, in fact, have economic consequences. This is something American job creators have come to know all too well over the last few years."

snip

ssa went so far as to offer additional help: "I look forward to providing the president with insights gained from our current effort to hear directly from job creators about what they perceive as barriers standing in the way of their ability to create jobs," he said.

And from U.S. Chamber of Commerce President Thomas Donohue came this review of Obama's order, complete with a call for Congress to take a more active role


Here is the key section of Obama's executive order:



This order requires that federal agencies ensure that regulations protect our safety, health and environment while promoting economic growth.


Which means that the entire federal regulatory process is now subverted from something specifically meant to protect the health and safety of the public to something where corporate profits must get factored in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Better an Obama Administration than BushCo*
I'll take a wait-and-see attitude on this. It may be horrible, but I'm not psychic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. Here's
the op-ed

Republicans love to spin things.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. If the OP's post is a Republican article...I still don't see anything wrong with what was said.
All the rules will need updating with the times. This is why the Constitution is always being ratified every day. The OP is making a mole out of an ant hill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. A Republican article?
Edited on Tue Jan-18-11 07:05 PM by ProSense
I was referring to the Republicans' spin:

Brendan Buck, a spokesman for Boehner, called it "a welcome acknowledgement that government regulations do, in fact, have economic consequences.


No one ever claimed that regulations don't have economic consequences.

Still, the President was clear, from his op-ed:

<...>

Sometimes, those rules have gotten out of balance, placing unreasonable burdens on business—burdens that have stifled innovation and have had a chilling effect on growth and jobs. At other times, we have failed to meet our basic responsibility to protect the public interest, leading to disastrous consequences. Such was the case in the run-up to the financial crisis from which we are still recovering. There, a lack of proper oversight and transparency nearly led to the collapse of the financial markets and a full-scale Depression.

<...>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Sorry my mistake. What is Buck talking about? That has nothing to do with the EO. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. largely a reaffirmation of a Clinton era executive order:
Executive Order 12866 http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/inforeg/eo12866.pdf
This is the new EO: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/01/18/improving-regulation-and-regulatory-review-executive-order

The general thrust of the new EO is contained in its first paragraph, which reads:

Section 1. General Principles of Regulation. (a) Our regulatory system must protect public health, welfare, safety, and our environment while promoting economic growth, innovation, competitiveness, and job creation. It must be based on the best available science. It must allow for public participation and an open exchange of ideas. It must promote predictability and reduce uncertainty. It must identify and use the best, most innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory ends. It must take into account benefits and costs, both quantitative and qualitative. It must ensure that regulations are accessible, consistent, written in plain language, and easy to understand. It must measure, and seek to improve, the actual results of regulatory requirements.


One positive thing I see in the new EO is that is expressly directs agencies, in applying the principles of the 1993 EO, "to use the best available techniques to quantify anticipated
present and future benefits and costs as accurately as possible. Where appropriate and permitted by law, each agency may consider (and discuss qualitatively) values that are difficult or impossible to quantify, including equity, human dignity, fairness, and distributive impacts."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. You'd think those pundits couldn't read if you believed what they wrote.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703396604576088272112103698.html

That is the article by President Obama, which does not read like it was spun by the pundits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. ??? What "pundits"?
Edited on Tue Jan-18-11 05:50 PM by brentspeak
No "pundits" were quoted in the articles. The only people quoted are Republicans who are gushing over Obama's "new direction". And the articles accurately excerpted from Obama's WSJ op-ed. You're either responding to the wrong thread or trying to employ some bizarre spin yourself (it didn't work).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I Think The Repugs Are Trying To Spin This To Their Advantage - BUT......
this could blow up in their faces as this could be a double edged sword.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Looks more like Obama's presidency is blowing up in the American people's faces n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. .
Edited on Tue Jan-18-11 09:26 PM by jaxx
See it as you choose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Citizen Worker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. This executive order may have as much to do with the standstill and rollback provisions of the
multiple trade agreements the US is signatory to. A little known provision contained within the Multilateral Agreement on Investment embedded in, at least, NAFTA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. Can someone explain to me how this is a bad thing? We always have to update rules.
Especially when it deals with an ever changing labor system and especially financial regulations. This is a gimme. I don't see how this in anyway is giving a golden key to the market.

You people make no sense. All my economist teachers would praise this action and 90% are liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DirkGently Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
16. "requires that federal agencies ensure ... economic growth." Unbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
impik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
17. obviously this NOT what the EO is, but who cares in this crazy la-la-land
Edited on Wed Jan-19-11 09:53 AM by impik
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
18. it's good to have a healthy imagination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC