Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Yes Virginia, there really is a problem with 2012 (R - Presidential) nominees.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
MinneapolisMatt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 12:07 PM
Original message
Yes Virginia, there really is a problem with 2012 (R - Presidential) nominees.
Just to clarify this is completely anecdotal and from one family only (mine). But I'd like to share.

Two weeks ago, I was discussing politics with my conservative republican parents. Point blank, I told them about Romney, and all that jazz. I asked them, "Would you vote for him, since you know, you view Mormonism is a cult?"

Mom: "Never."

Dad: "No."

They then proceeded to fill me in about the congregation of their fundie church, and every single person they talked to in their bible study could not in good faith vote for Romney because of his actions in Massachusetts, let alone the Mormon thing.

I just wanted to throw that out there. It is what it is. I think the republicans are in for some trouble in the nominating process in 2012. They are also not crazy about the fact (which they didn't know about until I told them) that FOX employed all of the other candidates. (They don't watch FOX or any news, really.)

I'm not sure where this is going, but my parents are very much a republican base, based on social issues. Romney is not their answer. In fact, they couldn't name a single person they liked.

My dad thinks Palin is hot, but my mom smacked him on the leg and he changed his story real fast hahahaha, and then said "It'll take more than looks for a nod", to which my mom and I both said "Thank GOD!" LOL.

They don't hate Obama. In fact, they are warming.

Stay tuned...




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Warming to Obama? Well, OK...
I spose he could cinch the election by enacting the Republican agenda. Privatize SS, eliminate Medicare, sign the bill repealing his health insurance reform, nuke Iran, put through an extension of tax cuts for the rich, and shut down the VA. He oughtta be able to win in a walk, with all the Citizens United money behind him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 12:15 PM
Original message
Thanks. Jeb? Please sample them on him, and let us know!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. dupe
Edited on Mon Nov-08-10 12:15 PM by elleng
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. Even people on this site are all "Obama's gonna LOSE 2012", and sorry to say, I'm not seeing it.
Republicans have absolutely NO ace-in-the-hole candidates. They don't. They have no name brands either and only one tattered, tabloid, reality-star brand in Palin. I don't think America is that off-the-charts idiotic to put her in the Oval Office.

You may counter with "well, they put BUSH in TWICE", but Bush had a long-standing name to help him. Corporations aren't as willing to back the Half-baked Alaskan as they were the Failure Fratster. He had a name and he was painted as a Moderate; most of middle America by then had vaguely heard about Bush and his governorship. They only knew he was the son of a Reagan-era VP and President and voted the legacy.

Everyone knows what a total whack-job SarUH Palin is by now; there ain't no hiding that. She's proven herself to be completely unqualified for high office.

The other candidates are Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney; each come with baggage conservatives and fundies really cannot stand. And nominating Jeb Bush will all but guarantee an Obama re-election - people are sick of the damned Bushes.

Like it's been said before - the last Republican that was elected that had neither a Bush or a Nixon on the ticket was Herbert Hoover. Let's keep that streak alive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rusty charly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. This is why the "liberal" media
keeps shoving Christie at us. They got nuthin' else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. If they run Rubio, we will have problems. He will take the Hispanic vote. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Nah
just re-run all the republicans who said that a few years in a state legislature followed by two years as a US Senator is not enough of a resume for a Presidential candidate (a position I admit I agreed with).

Now... since he doesn't need to run for reelection in 2012, he might make a dangerous VP nominee (helps them with conservatives, helps them with hispanics, helps them in FL).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
secondwind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Rubio is on the GOP short-list for VP in 2012
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. And Jeb Bush is married to a Hispanic lady.
Dubya is already out there trying to improve the Bush brand. No question it will be someone from a swing state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'm not sure that Romney has much of a chance this time.
It's clear that HCR will continue to be a major issue, and I'm not sure that his spin on the matter (his plan was very similar) gets him through the primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
8. That's all nice and stuff but
someone in a swing state like Portman in Ohio will win the nomination. Why would they saddle themselves with the usual line-up of undesirables, not that Portman is a desirable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC