Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Have we helped destroy the middle class via our 401ks?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Klukie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 07:53 AM
Original message
Have we helped destroy the middle class via our 401ks?
This is something I always think about when discussing job losses. Don't we feed the beast by investing in companies that close down production in the US to increase profitability for the shareholders?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. The 401(k) is the greatest marketing scam since bottled water.
nt


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. how so?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. it all depends how your 401k is set up. you could have 100% of your funds invested in bonds and
cash and never touch a single stock.

so many people don't have any idea how 401ks work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Klukie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I wonder what the percentages are...
Like how much we have invested as a nation and what we are invested in.....Do you know if there is a breakdown of that info?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. hm, not sure if that's published anywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
5. are you suggesting that were it not for 401Ks, money would not be
invested in stock?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Klukie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. No ..not at all...
I am well aware that someone will always invest. I am just wondering that maybe if we boycotted companies instead of ivesting in them we could gain the upper hand when it come to jobs. I think that our blind investments (including my own) may be part of the problem...but hey..we got a piece of it...right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. well - speaking for my plan - there is no lack of options should one want to
boycott certain stocks . . . or boycott stocks all together and invest in bonds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Klukie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yeah...well I would guess
that many just give their money over to the professionals to take care of because they don't understand the way it all works and as long as they get a return they don't pay attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. I don't doubt that at all
but if we can't even get our elected officials to stop rewarding this behavior, I am not sure we as individual stockholders have any leverage. Institutions are at the wheel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Klukie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. I am sure you are right....
It is very sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
6. Along with POORLY MANAGED TRADE POLICY. Outsourcing
and Relocation of jobs out of country with no concern
for Industrial Policy or maintaining a mfg base in this
country.

This is why the jobs continue to be lost. Companies
have and are adjusting for a middle class who earns
much less money.

This illustrates the adjustment being made.
Twin Bedspread with Shams at Sears $39 dollars.

Twin Bedspread with Shams at Pottery Barn $150 dollars.

This illustrates how the country is adjusting to the new normal.
\
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
7. Mutual funds
The mutual fund, combined with the 401K, have led in many ways to various market activities that we have seen lately. Wall Street started getting the kind of money that "community banks" used to get. One can argue about whether this was a good thing or not. The mortgage backed securities phenomenon was as much a response to foreign capital looking for a place to invest as American based capital.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
14. Yep, by subbing in for capital so they are free to speculate and now we aren't even capitalist
We just pretend to be so that the gamblers are worshiped and never expected to be responsible with their free resources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ItNerd4life Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
15. 401k has nothing to do with job losses.
Jobs relocating to other countries have to do with government policies. Blame the government for the relocation of jobs, not the companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Klukie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. So when a company makes a decision to shut down
and move to Mexico for cheaper labor that is the Governments fault...please tell me how. Maybe nameless, faceless stockholders wanting their returns may contribute to these decisions....maybe we are all responsible in some way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC