Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Explain this

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 05:05 PM
Original message
Explain this
Edited on Fri Jun-18-10 05:08 PM by ProSense
There is an article in LBN: BP Oil Spill: White House Intervenes After Coast Guard Stops Two More Oil-Sucking Barges

It includes this quote:

According to Plaquemines Parish officials, the White House found out about the boats being halted and spoke to the Coast Guard, informing them that from this point forward the Coast Guard can not interfere with cleanup operations, only make suggestions on safety concerns. Within a few hours, the barges were back in operation.


If you go to the link in the LBN article, you'll notice that the title was changed:

BP Oil Spill: Against Gov. Jindal's Wishes, Crude-Sucking Barges Stopped by Coast Guard
60 Days Into Oil Crisis, Gulf Coast Governors Say Feds Are Failing Them


Not unsusual, but the story has also changed. The statement about the White House is no longer in the article.

It now makes the point:

The governor said he didn't have the authority to overrule the Coast Guard's decision, though he said he tried to reach the White House to raise his concerns.

"They promised us they were going to get it done as quickly as possible," he said. But "every time you talk to someone different at the Coast Guard, you get a different answer."

After Jindal strenuously made his case, the barges finally got the go-ahead Thursday to return to the Gulf and get back to work, after more than 24 hours of sitting idle.


It's the big bad federal government:

The governor said the problem is there's still no single person giving a "yes" or "no." While the Gulf Coast governors have developed plans with the Coast Guard's command center in the Gulf, things begin to shift when other agencies start weighing in, like the Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

"It's like this huge committee down there," Riley said, "and every decision that we try to implement, any one person on that committee has absolute veto power."


Am I missing something? I'm not even sure why the WH had to be called. It sounds like "I'm gonna tell on you."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wildewolfe Donating Member (470 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. If I had to make a guess
FEMA and the Dept of homeland insecurity are still packed to the gills with incompetents from prior administration. Polical appointees that have gone civil (i.e. permanent) and are embedded and take months to years to get fired and out of the system.

Maybe this will expose more of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Here is something else the article reveals
Sixteen barges sat stationary Thursday, although they had been sucking up thousands of gallons of BP's oil as recently as Tuesday.


Who knew? We've heard all along that nothing was being done.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wildewolfe Donating Member (470 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. There is another interesting part
in the section you quote... "of BP's oil"

wait...what?

Why should that be BP's at this point and could that be part of it? Oil is still oil and the more BP can recover and not someone else the more offset to their damages they see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Good catch.
Edited on Fri Jun-18-10 05:39 PM by ProSense
Also, this is not a quote from a BP executive (none is the subject of the article), it's ABC's lede.

Hmmm?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SkyDaddy7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. ABC has been misleading the enti time!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conscious evolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Interesting point
As I recall,anyone salvaging items lost at sea can make claims in court for a significant portion of the salvaged goods monetary value.
Someone could be making a good chunk of change off of the oil salvaged.
Wonder who that might be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. Those damn EPA and FWS regulations
So what if those barges are destroying the very wildlife we're all trying to save.

All those governors care about is their pretty beaches and the tourist dollars.

I don't know, but that would be my guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. There go those "patriot journalists" again . . .
changing the story to suit their narrative.

And from ABC News no less. What a shocker.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Morbius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I call them "Disney News."
Kind of fitting, I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. +1, n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Disney news...good point...and now they have
Harry Potter, good grief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Agreed.
:fistbump:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
13. CNN is showing little Bobby Jindal with his life jacket on, sucking up the oil while complaining
about how he can't get the equipment he needs. Ol' Anderson Cooper is there "keepin' them honest," making little Bobby look like the hero who's doing all he can because he "can't wait around" while the oil is ruining his state. NO mention of Bobby's incompetence re: not doling out the money or using the National Guard provided. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC