Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jimmy Carter got same media treatment as Obama has.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
dumpdabaggers Donating Member (275 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 04:00 PM
Original message
Jimmy Carter got same media treatment as Obama has.
While Carter was running for the presidency he could do no wrong according to most media. The second he took office the media began to pick him apart. No decision he ever made was the right one, everything that had gone wrong over the previous five years was now his fault. Anything negative was picked up on, anything positive like Camp David, was poo pooed.

The same thing has occured with Obama. In truth, most of the media has been highly critical of Obama since the day after he took office. The positive is seldom talked about in any detail, but the negative is picked apart.

The story since the dawning of the tea baggers has been how Obama is "losing support." The tea party is presented like "the independents," who are "mad as hell." The Republican's are going to win back the House and Senate in November.

Just look at the attention Sarah Palin gets. WHen has a defeated VP candidate ever gotten this much coverage?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't think the media thought that Obama would end up winning
after they played Rev. Wright's loop-D-loop for two months.
They weren't prepared for folks not giving a damn.

Whatever their plan was after they saw that failing
failed greatly due to the collapse of the financial system.....
and then it was probably decided that they might as well get him
to clean up the shit.

Then they drove his approval rating sky high right after inauguration
(likening him to Lincoln) in order that any poll numbers after that
would looks small in comparison.

The media governs us via commissioned polls. If you notice the NCB/WSJ poll that just came out,
the media is acting and reporting like those poll results actually speaks for America as a whole,
without respect to the poll questions and methodology, and how the poll was conducted.
They really want us to believe that speaking to 1,000 people at 3:00 p.m. in the afternoon
over landlines represents American opinions in their entirity.

Many of us eat it up and go along with the findings of these questionable commissioned polls.
Why, I don't know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Absolutely! They were awful in the way they treated them like bumpkins.
A lot of it was centered around Billy and his beer drinking, but they were merciless. If it wasn't Billy, it was making fun of their daughter, Amy...the food they served their guests...there was no end to it.

President Carter was good for the times, as he had a calm demeanor and was able to settle the country down again after the protests and fighting that the country was going through when he took office.

The press has too much power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. LOL...Obama had an easy campaign?
Rev. Wright?
Bradley Effect?
Too Elitist?
Not American?
Too Black?
Not really black enough?
Whitey Tape?
His Wife hates America?
He's a Muslim?
His birth certificate?
...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. The Palin obsession from the media
is unreal. They would never give a Democrat that type of attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. Usually
a defeated VP candidate is looked at as a potential front runner for four years later. That happened with John Edwards, Joe Lieberman, Jack Kemp (to a lesser degree), Dan Quayle, Walter Mondale, Bob Dole, and Edmond Muskie.

Only Geraldine Ferraro and Lloyd Bentsen didn't enjoy such a spotlight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. Every Democrat gets the same treatment, they did the same
with Bill Clinton. The MSM was on to Clinton before he even took office, they found fault with every appointment he made and then said he wasn't filling government appointments fast enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. I don't remember anybody questioning Carters citizenship.
Or, for that matter, anybody claiming that because Carter was elected, we don't need affirmative action anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. Look at the way the dissed Bill Clinton
Every single Democratic president gets the same treatment. They have they heads so entombed in republican butt they Know they have to tell lies about Democrats. After all the republicans own every single media outlet out there. You know they are going to try to topple the Democratic president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC