Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama nominee's fate in flux as labor lawyer loses GOP support

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 04:06 PM
Original message
Obama nominee's fate in flux as labor lawyer loses GOP support

Obama nominee's fate in flux as labor lawyer loses GOP support
By Kevin Bogardus - 02/04/10 01:27 PM ET


Two Senate Republicans who previously supported a controversial labor board nominee opposed him on Thursday, putting his confirmation in doubt.

Sens. Mike Enzi (Wyo.) and Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) backed Craig Becker’s nomination to the National Labor Relations Board during his approval vote at the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee last fall. But his nomination stalled under heavy lobbying by business groups. Becker had to be re-nominated by President Barack Obama this year, and the nominee lost Enzi's and Murkowski’s support in a party-line vote taken by the committee Thursday.

The HELP panel advanced Becker's nomination on a 13-10 vote. But Democrats are about to lose their filibuster-proof majority with the arrival of Scott Brown, the newly elected Massachusetts Republican who is being sworn in to the Senate later on Thursday. That leaves Becker's fate in flux.

Becker, an associate general counsel to both the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) and the AFL-CIO, is viewed by business trade groups as someone who could institute parts of the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA) through executive action if confirmed. The bill is favored by unions but opposed by the business community.

more...

http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/79781-obama-nominees-confirmation-in-doubt-as-labor-lawyer-loses-gop-support
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluescribbler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Call their bluff
Make them filibuster. Dammit, Brown wanted to be sworn in today, just so he could block this appointment. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. So Mr. President, how is that bipartisanship working out for you? /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. Recess appointment. I don't generally like them, but enough is enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC