Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Since political realism is in vogue, there is a way to fix the economy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 08:34 PM
Original message
Since political realism is in vogue, there is a way to fix the economy
Edited on Fri Jan-29-10 08:47 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
Anyone who has read my posts knows that I consider a "lost decade" to still be at least a 50-50 proposition, see no growth on the horizon about to reduce unemployment to morally acceptable levels and favor dramatic action on the economy and employment.

My proposals are usually leftist, but my concern in practical not idealogical. It's just that leftist solutions work better for less money.

I think the incoming administration had an opportunity and obligation to change the political playing field on the economy and the deficit, but it was not to be. Okay... no point crying over spilled milk.

So, given the realities that face (no spending, pugs running everything with their mighty 41-59 majority, president playing deficit politics...) us what can be done?

Easy. A two trillion dollar tax cut; half 2009, half 2010. Whatever percentage that works out to with income under $100,000 receiving twice the cut.

Could that get through Congress? Yes.

Is it a better plan than whatever we are actually going to do? Yes. (Not because it is smart but because it is huge... smart AND huge doesn't seem to be a poltical option and huge is more important.)

Would it reduce unemployment and offer the hope of a meaningful jump-start to the sort of growth we need to even begin to repair the damage that has been done? Yes. It would be a lot more expensive than smarter things but those are smarter things that aren't going to happen.

It is not optimal. It isn't what I would prefer. I can think of 100 better approaches but not one of the would get through congress in today's absurd environment. We could probably get the same effect with 50-60% the money in the form of targeted spending, but that isn't going to happen.

So it is the right thing to do because it is the only politically viable BIG move.

So just how "grown up" are we? After all the lectures about realism and bipartisanship are we prepared to follow the only option we have left ourselves?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC