|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Krashkopf (965 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 12:23 PM Original message |
The President's very WEAK rebuke of SCOTUS during the SOTU. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Krashkopf (965 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 12:25 PM Response to Original message |
1. UNREC'd in 14 views! Thats a new record for me! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 12:26 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Ah yes. The old "People disagree with me because I speak truth to power" martyrdom spiel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Krashkopf (965 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 12:28 PM Response to Reply #3 |
10. So tell me where I am WRONG in my OP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 12:30 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Since it's opinion, you're neither right or wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 12:30 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. I didn't say anything was wrong. I didn't unrecommend it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Krashkopf (965 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 02:45 PM Response to Reply #14 |
39. My comment had NOTHING to do with making "the Greatest" page . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 04:02 PM Response to Reply #39 |
44. Recommend/Unrecommend affect ONE thing: The Greatest Page. That's it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Teaser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 12:26 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. or you either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 12:29 PM Response to Reply #1 |
11. Is that #2 or #1? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 12:25 PM Response to Original message |
2. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 12:26 PM Response to Original message |
5. yawn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
monmouth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 12:26 PM Response to Original message |
6. Well I loved it, rec'd it still at 0....sigh...n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
7. under your amendment, would the New York Times Co have first amendment rights? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Krashkopf (965 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 12:52 PM Response to Reply #7 |
25. The NYT Company would not, but the NYT's PUBLISHER and JOURNALISTS would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 01:06 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. but its the NY Times Company that published the papers and that was enjoined |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Krashkopf (965 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 01:44 PM Response to Reply #27 |
33. OK, Here is my Amended Proposed Amendment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 01:47 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. how do you define "the press"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Krashkopf (965 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 02:05 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. Not being an "originalist" . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 02:19 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. this is an interesting discussion. A few more thoughts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
8. tried--but still at zero. oh yeah, congress will "right this wrong" SUUUUURE they will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 12:28 PM Response to Original message |
9. That would have been a really cute thing to say but totally stupid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Krashkopf (965 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 12:32 PM Response to Reply #9 |
15. First, CONGRESS has to pass an Amendent . . .THEN it goes to the States for RATIFICATION. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jamastiene (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 12:29 PM Response to Original message |
12. We need FDR style courage right now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NatBurner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 12:35 PM Response to Original message |
16. exactly! he shoulda hopped his happy ass off that podiium |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 12:36 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Then he should have impaled Alito with the American Flag and said a witty one-liner |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NatBurner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 12:39 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. perfect! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 12:38 PM Response to Original message |
18. Obama didn't come across as weak at all to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
20. I love your Rovian tactic of attacking strength by calling it weakness. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Krashkopf (965 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 12:48 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. Go back and watch the address, again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 12:51 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. and your proposed amendment is nonsensical |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 12:53 PM Response to Reply #22 |
26. No. I'd just prefer to dismiss your purposefully overanalytical, meritless bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 01:40 PM Response to Reply #26 |
30. ROFL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lord Helmet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 12:45 PM Response to Original message |
21. this OP is weak |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 12:50 PM Response to Original message |
23. Due respect, I don't think you understand the Supreme Court decision |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Krashkopf (965 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 01:35 PM Response to Reply #23 |
29. With all due respect . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 04:36 PM Response to Reply #29 |
45. It's not the last "low barrier" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 01:34 PM Response to Original message |
28. Yup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iceman66 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 01:40 PM Response to Original message |
31. I would have liked him to have been more agressive, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tranche (913 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 01:44 PM Response to Original message |
32. He should have given them all the people's elbo and finished it off with a rock bottom. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 01:55 PM Response to Original message |
35. This post is weak.....and pathetic. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Krashkopf (965 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 02:09 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. Not nearly as WEAK . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ikonoklast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-29-10 12:31 AM Response to Reply #37 |
51. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 02:56 PM Response to Original message |
40. Opinion piece. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jennicut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 02:58 PM Response to Original message |
41. He got everyone talking about it...it was not on the radar screen before that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Krashkopf (965 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 03:05 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. That "All-politicians-are-corrupt . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jennicut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 03:09 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. Yes, but we are but a small percentage of the voters out there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 07:11 PM Response to Original message |
46. what's it like to eat your cereal with lemon juice instead of milk? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
namahage (678 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 11:10 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. I don't think that yellow liquid is lemon juice. N/T |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigwillq (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 11:11 PM Response to Original message |
48. I thought it was a stern scolding of their decision. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
apocalypsehow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 11:11 PM Response to Original message |
49. UnRecc'd, as it richly deserves to be. Enjoy your stay. n/t. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-28-10 11:23 PM Response to Original message |
50. Highly unrecommended |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
euphoria12leo (511 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-30-10 09:34 AM Response to Reply #50 |
57. Everyone is always saying what the President |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliffordu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-29-10 12:51 AM Response to Original message |
52. How does it feel to be less relevant than before you posted this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Krashkopf (965 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-30-10 09:01 AM Response to Reply #52 |
55. Sycophantic CONSERVADEMS like you . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fishwax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-29-10 01:47 AM Response to Original message |
53. It was precisely the right tone for the venue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressOnTheMove (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-29-10 06:17 AM Response to Original message |
54. He demanded exactly what Congress is capable of doing at this time... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ncteechur (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-30-10 09:24 AM Response to Original message |
56. you want to tell them they were wrong but you don't want to pick a fight with them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 08th 2024, 12:28 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC