Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

We need to not jump the shark on the "Freeze" idea that Obama will speak about

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 01:47 PM
Original message
We need to not jump the shark on the "Freeze" idea that Obama will speak about
We need to all calm down on this "freeze" idea.

It's not going to really do anything other than to appeal to Independents, fiscal-moderate Democrats and even moderate Republicans in the 2010 election cycle.

Additionally, those Democrats who will need something to tell their constituents that the "out-of-control spending" going on with the various stimulus/rescue programs in the 2010 election climate have something to point to as evidence something "will get done".

It's political kabuki theater to triangulate the Republicans who are whining that money is being "needlessly spent", even though the military industrial complex's insane funding will continue unscathed. We'll still be building hospitals and schools "over there" while we shut them down here. Yes, we'll still spend more on our military contracts and defense budget than all the other nations in the World combined. Just try to stop it without getting getting a nice, big target on your head.

Don't kid yourself. War is good for America. Setting up phony wars to beta-test new weapons (like the drones in Afghanistan) is something the war machine investors want to see. There is an endless set of new weapons projects to keep making and all you have to worry about is people complaining that you're killing some innocent, impoverished brown people as part of "collateral damage". Heck, they're usually religiously on the "wrong side" as well as are illiterate.

However, I digress.

So what can the Republican candidate in a tight race say to a Democrat in a debate regarding "crazy government spending" when the Democrat can stay "we are in the process of a government spending freeze" and "looking at wasteful spending"... game over, Republican candidate. The only other thing that Republican can then do is say the Democrat is against God, for gays and against guns. People yawn at that shit now. Crickets, muthufuckuh...

So let the "Freeze" be what it is... an Ace in the hole for tight races in 2010 for Democrats. Jumping the shark on this either proves you're a political Noob or feckless whiner.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Defense contracts....just look at CT. Lieberman loves defense contracts.
But this freeze is limited and is intended to cut wasteful and redundant programs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. thank you. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. Where are all the people who are always saying how good Republicans are at certain things?
Well, they just got a huge taste of their own medicine.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Right, For Once We're Mimicking Republican Messaging Tactics
And now they complain because he's dishonest and using a gimmick.

You can't win for losing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. I agree, but it's kind of too late now.
The jump the shark moment has unfortunately already been recorded in Google's cache.

Just one more embarrassment for DU by the snap-judgment reactionaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. No, it does one other thing: it cedes the debate to the right wing. Again.
We have this alleged great communicator in the White House. Why does he have to play these political games? Can't he just come out and lead?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. And what harm could a little (more!) pandering to the right do?
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. He framed this badly. He should have added that he also intends to reduce military spending by
ending the Iraq war completely in 2010 and closing Gitmo and doing everything he can to wind down Afghanistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Actually...
Gitmo was supposed to close this month, but Obama ran into the usual suspects dragging their feet, but he made this statement November, 2009:

"We are on a path and a process where I would anticipate that Guantanamo will be closed next year," he said. "I'm not going to set an exact date because a lot of this is also going to depend on cooperation from Congress."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/18/AR2009111800571.html

As for Iraq and Afghanistan, both of those wars are on track to have either complete withdrawals or being close to withdrawal by 2011-12.

I wish both wars ended last week, but the fact that the President doesn't have monarchistic powers to decree his will has to be taken in account.

:hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. Not sure what you are thinking
"So what can the Republican candidate in a tight race say to a Democrat in a debate regarding "crazy government spending" when the Democrat can stay "we are in the process of a government spending freeze" and "looking at wasteful spending".."

“Given the choice between a Republican and someone who acts like a Republican, people will vote for the real Republican all the time” Harry S. Truman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spoony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yes yes, we get it. Anyone with any criticism is a whiner and an idiot.
Edited on Tue Jan-26-10 03:07 PM by spoony
Do you ever post anything that doesn't boil down to that? Also, I think you ought to look up "jumping the shark." It doesn't mean what you seem to think it does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Ah yes...
Illustrate to me exactly what the Democrat says in a debate with a Republican and a frothing at the mouth audience when the Republican says "You Democrats are spending money way out of control... you Democrats don't care about spending tax dollars for (insert blah blah blah).

Why, if you're a dumb ass, you'd say that we need to spend money on all these programs so that it will get better. Granted, that's the right answer.

But this is politics.

What you'd say is that you agree with the President that we need to put a freeze on spending on programs that need to be investigated on and give the people the (insert blah blah blah....)

As I indicated, the freeze talk is basically untraceable and is political maneuvering for the 2010 races. And I will also reiterate that those who think it's a bad idea are political novices or just people who like to whine to hear their whining heard.

This is politics 101, ferchrisssakes. Leave your purity at the door.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
12. "the freeze" "It's political kabuki theater" LOL! like "change" or "hope"
Edited on Tue Jan-26-10 06:44 PM by amborin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. If a person starts out thinking lies are cool and admirable, why stop now?
The DU-wide spectacle of the President being defended by stating that he is some sort of a con artist is not pretty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. it's not pretty, but
Edited on Tue Jan-26-10 07:37 PM by amborin
most of this is coming from the DLC shills, i believe

they are unwittingly proving critics' point

do they even realize the hypocrisy of their statements?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
14. Finally! Someone gets it.
Congratulations Zulchzulu, you win a PIE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lord Helmet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
16. The shark-jumpers are getting their hate on before the SOTU.
Biden's economic adviser explained the proposal yesterday (not an across the board freeze, social programs will be boosted, etc.) but this gives people another 24 hours to make accusations and rail against Obama until the truth comes out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC