Venezuelanalysis: "Evo Morales Incites Genocide of the Peruvian Police Force"

[magbana]

A tongue-in-check, spot-on analysis of Alan Garcia's attempt to blame anyone and everyone for his government's genocidal answer to their precious national resources issue.
magbana

"Evo Morales Incites Genocide of the Peruvian Police Force

June 16th 2009, by Belen Fernandez - Pulse

In a June 13 article in the online version of the Bolivian state-run newspaper Cambio, Peruvian president Alan García is quoted as accusing international communism of attempting to create chaos in Peru. Recent examples of chaos might include helicopter attacks on indigenous protesters in the Peruvian Amazon in order to safeguard foreign exploitation of resources; one result of attributing his country’s internal problems to an international communist conspiracy is that García and Venezuelan president Hugo Chávez are shown to share the same fundamental belief that history has not, in fact, ended.

Chávez’ reluctance to accept the end of history was documented in an August 2006 article by Johns Hopkins professor Francis Fukuyama in the Washington Post. In the article, predictably entitled “The End of Chávez,” Fukuyama asserts that “Chavismo is not Latin America’s future — if anything, it is its past”; whether García will receive a similar reminder entitled “The End of the Cold War” remains to be seen. Allegiance to outdated historical models has meanwhile been observed among other sectors of the global population such as my grandfather, who exhibited unwavering commitment to the idea that his nursing home companions and their oxygen tanks were involved in a Soviet plot.

Fukuyama outlines the circumstances that have enabled Chávez to pretend that he is a substitute for the end of history: “The answer is oil, oil, oil.” This answer might of course prove appropriate for a number of other contemporary questions, as well, such as what controls the behavior of liberal democracies with market economies. Fukuyama goes on to illustrate the unsustainable nature of Chavez’ high self-esteem:

Last December, a bridge on the road connecting the Venezuelan capital to its international airport collapsed, diverting traffic into the mountains and stretching a 45-minute journey into one lasting several hours. A two-lane emergency highway now bears this traffic; renovation of the bridge is still months away. The bridge epitomizes what is happening to Venezuela today: As Chávez jets to Minsk, Moscow and Tehran in search of influence and prestige, the country’s infrastructure is collapsing.”

Not addressed in the parable are that Chávez presumably had to take the same mountain road as everyone else to get to his jet, or that the Mdairej bridge in Lebanon—the highest in the Middle East—had also collapsed around the same time as this article was published, albeit at the hand of nations that had already surpassed history.

As for Chávez’ accomplice in postponing the end of history, Fukuyama argues that “it will soon dawn on that his country’s natural gas is not a fungible commodity like Venezuelan crude oil,” and that his “only real customer is Brazil, which he has already alienated through his nationalization of the heavily Brazilian foreign energy investments.” Alan García meanwhile maintained a different perspective on foreign intervention, and told Morales to shut up earlier this month after the Bolivian leader declared that the US was scheming to install a military base in Peru.

García explained his choice to paraphrase King Juan Carlos of Spain, whose claims to fame included telling Hugo Chávez to shut up, as being based on the fact that Morales should concern himself with his own country: “étete en tu país y no te metas en el mío.” Such concerns resurfaced with the indigenous protests in the Amazon, which the Peruvian government retroactively decided had been encouraged by a letter Morales sent to the Congreso de Indígenas held in the Peruvian city of Puno at the end of May. In the letter, Morales had excused his absence from the meeting and had implied a replacement of the end of history with the following sequence: resistencia – rebellion – revolución.

According to Peruvian prime minister Yehude Simon, the sending of letters encouraging revolution was unacceptable. The United States had also demonstrated its opposition to traditional modes of correspondence in Latin America over the years, and had preferred orchestrating coups and training death squads. Attempts to charge Morales with additional unacceptable behavior were thwarted when it was discovered that Nicaragua and not Bolivia had granted asylum to Peruvian indigenous leader Alberto Pizango; not categorized as unacceptable was Peru’s decision to grant asylum to former Bolivian ministers before they could be tried for genocide.

The genocide charges were incurred following street protests in Bolivia in 2003, which had begun in response to natural gas exploitation and the failure of the current Bolivian government to tell the US to shut up. Alan García has since applied alternate interpretations of genocide to similar situations, and is quoted in the Cambio article of June 13 as accusing indigenous extremists of enacting a “genocidio de policías” in Peru. As the police are one ethnic group that has been historically underrepresented as genocide victims, we can only assume that new criminal forms are part of the end of history.
"
http://www.venezuelanalysis.com/analysis/4522

[rabs]

1. Peru yesterday recalled its ambassador to La Paz over the remarks by Morales

Fernando Rojas, get your butt back to Lima

In most undiplomatic language, the Peruvian foreign minister called Morales a "liar."

--------------------------

Lima, 15 jun (ABI).- Perú llamó el lunes a consultas a su embajador en Bolivia, Fernando Rojas, después de las declaraciones del presidente Evo Morales, que el gobierno peruano consideró ofensivas y de injerencia, informaron fuentes oficiales.

Rojas fue llamado a Lima como un gesto de rechazo a las declaraciones del mandatario boliviano que el pasado sábado calificó de genocidio del Tratado de Libre Comercio con Estados Unidos las muertes de campesinos peruanos en la región amazónica de Bagua.

El Canciller peruano, José Antonio García Belaunde, dijo que el gobierno de su país tomó la decisión de llamar a su embajador en Bolivia como una "manifestación de desagravio por las constantes intromisiones del gobierno de Bolivia" en los asuntos internos de Perú.

García Belaunde informó que el embajador Rojas llegará mañana a Lima y que aún no se decide la fecha de su retorno a La Paz.

En una entrevista concedida al diario Expreso, el Canciller peruano calificó de "mentiroso" a Morales porque, a su juicio, afirmó sin pruebas que se produjo un genocidio en la selva peruana y había anticipado que llamaría a consultas a su embajador en La Paz.

---------------------

Fyi it looks like Alan Garcia will lose his prime minister. He would be the second cabinet minister to resign over the Bagua massacre.

------------------

LIMA (AFP) — Peru's Prime Minister Yehude Simon said Tuesday he will resign in the coming weeks once a crisis over Indian rights in the Amazon has been settled and calm returns.

"I will leave as soon as everything has been calmed down, which should be in the coming weeks," he told the privately owned Lima radio station RPP.

------

The opposition, the Peruvian press, as well as the main Indian collective had demanded Simon's resignation, but he had said he would not leave under pressure.

But on Monday, he raised the possibility he might step down, saying he would have no problem doing so once the crisis with the Indians was resolved.

He appeared to have been shaken by the deaths of police officers and Indians in the violence ten days ago, saying their deaths would stay with him "until death."

Simon, 61, a leftist who describes himself as a "humanist," was named prime minister in October 2008 to give a "social face" to president Alan Garcia's liberal economic policies.

(English) http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5i72vFdyZpe7I93Sx4fmioC6EwmZA