|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
pinto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-24-07 05:16 PM Original message |
Don't know how this will shake out, but Ms. Pelosi making a good argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pinto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-24-07 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
1. Vote is up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-24-07 05:19 PM Response to Original message |
2. you think so? I thought she sounded tired and defeated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pinto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-24-07 05:25 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. Yeah she seemed a little shaky. Her talking points were laid out well, though. Walking a line, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endarkenment (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-24-07 05:19 PM Original message |
Bunch of bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-24-07 05:24 PM Response to Original message |
5. thats how the system works |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endarkenment (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-24-07 05:45 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Uh no. That was a deliberate choice to provide cover. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-24-07 05:19 PM Response to Original message |
3. Is she voting for it, or against it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Disturbed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-24-07 05:22 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Pelosi lost my respect when she threw in the towel by |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pinto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-24-07 05:28 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. I favor separating impeachment from the funding bill in this case. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KingFlorez (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-24-07 05:48 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. Why impeach when there is no chance to convict? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Telly Savalas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-24-07 05:58 PM Response to Original message |
10. Bush would have vetoed a stand-alone veteran's funding bill? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 10th 2024, 07:09 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC