Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

if you're unhappy about tsa rules, why not petition for a rule-making?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 01:13 AM
Original message
if you're unhappy about tsa rules, why not petition for a rule-making?
it's basic regulatory stuff: anybody can be a blowhard, but if you want a change in the regulations, take a bit of time and write to the agency to ask for the change you want
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. Because it is boring /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. +
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. I post here on the assumption that people read it.
If they don't then it is to establish a just recompense on those that censor.

It would be funny if years of explaining thoughts on existence was not read, and a heavy price for some to pay if they kept it from being read, so maybe it is a form of setting an action.

The nice thing is even if one person was responsible for censorship, the entire ideologies, and all that follow them can be held to account, that is also how anyone that made money from the same worse ideas that led to smears can be held to pay me what is due.

Side note, I am still due beer and travel money and many experiences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. is the comment period open?
was there an actual rulemaking with comment period for these latest procedures?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Look through the appropriate volume of 49 CFR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. Wrong...there's no comment period in CFR publications, active comment periods would be in Fed. Reg.
Edited on Sun Nov-21-10 11:59 AM by CreekDog
nevermind that the average person is not going to know what the heck you are talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Um ... I suggested petitioning for rule-making. In response, you incoherently asked whether
the comment period was open. That is a senseless response, because obviously there is no comment period on a suggestion to submit a petition for rulemaking: if such petition were submitted and produced a proposed rule, there would be a comment period on the proposed rule

Rather than muck about with your first senseless question, I ignored it; I then addressed how you can find a precise answer to your second question "Was there an actual rulemaking with comment period for these latest procedures?" The answer is, you can find the Federal Register citations for rules in the Code of Federal Regulations by reading the CFR closely enough. I'll try it again more slowly: Go look at 49 CFR. Find the rule. Read the section carefully. Note the FR citations
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Why is asking about a comment period a bad question?
and why is telling me to go look in the CFR in response to a comment period question a good answer?

it's not.

so there's no comment period because there's no rule. obviously that avenue is shut down --you could have just said that.

no wonder it's a struggle for progress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. What we have here is a failure to communicate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. yes you do
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. Because petitions do not work
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. In comparison to what? Noisy anonymous internet outrage?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
26. I don't think you should disparage the original post like that.
Edited on Sun Nov-21-10 02:41 PM by TexasObserver
As I said, petitions are a waste of time, but no reason to treat the OP as less than adequate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 04:11 AM
Response to Original message
5. Can you show where someone has successfully done this in the past?
because I'm pretty sure any discretionary rule-making at the federal level, especially with regards to security, is not made based on citizen opinion. That's how it got this far in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 04:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. +1
Let's be serious now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Your question strongly suggests you've never looked at an issue of the FR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Let's say I haven't
Do you have an answer to my question anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. My suggestion is that you might want to familiarize yourself a bit with Federal rulemaking before
expressing sweeping opinions about it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. It's just that
past experience with contacting public officials indicates that they will freely ignore public comment regardless of how many there are.

So I was wondering if you knew of an actual time when a regular non-politically-connected average Joe US citizen made an appeal to change a federal rule, and it actually got changed?

Do you actually know of any time this has happened? Or is this simply theoretical?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
12. Outside of environmental issues, I doubt many here have considered rulemaking.
But you're right, of course. A rule is a rule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WestSeattle2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
21. I think letters to senators would be more helpful. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
23. You are naive if the PTB give a shit what us "little people" think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
24. Why so they can come to your house and cavity search you?
How do normal people buy into such fascist ways, is a mystery to me. All this proves OBL really did win and we lost...our civil liberties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC