Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Attacks Critics Of ‘War On Terror’ As ‘Naïve’

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 11:39 AM
Original message
Bush Attacks Critics Of ‘War On Terror’ As ‘Naïve’
Edited on Thu May-24-07 12:13 PM by babylonsister
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/24/bush-war-terrorism/

Bush Attacks Critics Of ‘War On Terror’ As ‘Naïve’

Former senator John Edwards (D-NC) said yesterday that the “war on terrorism” is a “slogan designed only for politics, not a strategy to make America safe.”

By framing this as a “war,” we have walked straight into the trap that the terrorists have set — that we are engaged in some kind of clash of civilizations and a war against Islam.

Edwards is not alone. House Armed Services Committee Chairman Ike Skelton (D-MO) has stopped using the phrase “global war on terror” in committee budget documents, and the British government has banned the phrase “because it gives militant groups a shared identity.”

During a press conference today, President Bush attacked these critics of the phrase. “This notion about how this isn’t a war on terror in my view is naïve. It doesn’t reflect the true nature of the world in which we live, you know?”

Watch it at link, if you can stomach it~

The “true nature of the world” is that global terrorism has exploded under Bush’s watch, and his statement today is pure hypocrisy. In August 2004, President Bush said, “We actually misnamed the war on terror,” acknowledging it was more accurate to describe it as a struggle against “ideological extremists” who “happen to use terror as a weapon.”

Transcript:

BUSH: And they will fight us. And the fundamental question is will we fight them?

I have made the decision to do so. I believe that the best way to protect us in this war on terror is to fight them. And so, we’re fighting them in Iraq; we’re fighting them in Afghanistan; we’ve helped the Philippines fight — Philippine government fight them. We’re fighting them.

And this notion about how this isn’t a war on terror in my view is naïve. It doesn’t reflect the true nature of the world in which we live, you know?

The lessons of September the 11th are these: We’ve got to stay on the offense. We’ve got to bring these people to justice before they hurt again.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. Meh. If I had a dime for every time I've been called naive,
the Bushies would think me wealthy enough to actually matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yes Mr. bush.
We sure took care of those Iraqis for it. They got justice like an wrongly convicted innocent man gets the electric chair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. Ask him to spell it. - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. LOL! Perfect.
Even better, ask him what it means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. That would certainly generate a Moment of Zen for Stewart et al. - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. Bush: N I E V
MSM: I guess it's in the dictionary ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. I shudder to think how many wouldn't notice or wouldn't know it was wrong. - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bryan Buchan Donating Member (253 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. Keep it up Bush
Keep it up chimp, you'll guarantee a dem holding your office for quite some time come November 2008 :dunce:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
25. Not necessarily ... that little "presidential directive" which gives him "wide powers"
may just have him declare the 2008 Presidential election null and void, given some "terrorist attack" ...

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/05/20070509-12.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
5. ha ha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
6. Dems are going to take a beating today. From the hawks,
from the doves and over the Ethics bill.

It's going to be ugly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Make that a 'well-deserved' beating. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. But I'm a pacifist!
lol

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. I thought I was, too, but am having
second thoughts after yesterday. :mad:


:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
7. Then we should address his CONTEMPT for the American Public
WHEN is his utter CONTEMPT for the wishes of the public going to be spotlighted and discussed?

This is the same sort of arrogance his white trash wealthy family uses on the hired help. We need to force people to see that he doesn't give a rat's ass for anyone other than his own Corporate Cronies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
8. If "staying on the offense" is what it's about, Bush** wins hands down
He's the most offensive piece of shit to stain the Oval Office. EVER.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
10. No. "Naive" was ignoring those reports of "Bin Laden Determined To Strike In United States"
and going on vacation. That was YOU, President Usurping-Mass-Murdering-Traitor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
14. * is helping to create more terrorists.
Reagan-Bush helped create the Mujahideen in Afghanistan (which became the Taliban and al-Qaeda).
Bushco allies are also implicated in wire transfers of funds to the 9/11 hijackers (as well as long list of other complicity).

Bush is like an arsonist who burns a house a down then turns up later in a fireman's uniform and says he's here to save the day. He is a psychopathic narcissist living out his war-hero fantasy on a global scale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
16. LOL - not as naive as "greeted with flowers and candy"
at least we remember what happened
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
17. naïve?
Flowers and chocolates naïve? or war will pay for itself naïve? or is it not knowing the difference between Sunni and Shiite naïve? or is it WMD in Iraq threatening to attack America naïve? Is it capping the amount you can sue for will solve health care crisis in the US naïve?

"We’re fighting them"

Who's them? The giant ants?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
18. BRAVO EDWARDS
He said something that is true and to the point
Slogan :war on terror
This administration is nothing but slogans

'Fighting them over there so they wont come here blah blah blah......

'They work at the 'pleasure' of the President....:puke: :puke: :puke:

'Cut and run'

Their 'talking points' and slogans are really getting old and tired, and ignorant

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. I caught him on Tavis Smiley last night. He was very good.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
22. Coming from someone who started terrorism in Iraq when there wasn't any beforehand?
Terrorists didn't get much chance under Saddam. Until Curious George came along.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bob3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
23. proving that he's going to say bad things about democrats
no matter how nice to him they are.

there is no point in it. Might as well be hung for a lion as a lamb yes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
24. Yeah...pie in the sky people calling others naive
Wheeee

America's government is infected with corruption and those inside the hot zone call others naive for wanting to cut the necrotic parts out. Primarily because they ARE the necrotic flesh that needs to be removed.

Those afraid of the needed cure want so desperately to believe the cure is an election way...and then the next election when that doesn't work...and then the next election when that doesn't work...

Oh, I laugh - but it's not a happy laugh


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
26. Who do I want to see brought to justice? Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice,Gonzo, Perle, Wolfie, and all
the rest of the war-mongering, empire-obsessed, PNAC idiots!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC