Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So Obama's deficit commission now wants to eliminate Medicare.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Elwood P Dowd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 09:23 PM
Original message
So Obama's deficit commission now wants to eliminate Medicare.
What is next?


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40244470

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama's deficit commission on Wednesday debated a dramatic plan to gradually turn Medicare from a system in which the government pays most beneficiaries' medical bills into a program in which seniors would purchase health insurance with government-issued vouchers.

Current Medicare beneficiaries wouldn't be affected, nor would future enrollees age 55 or over.

The plan by Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., and Democratic economist Alice Rivlin of the panel would seem to face steep odds with most other panel Democrats.

Ryan came under assault by Democrats and President Obama during this year's campaign over a similar plan, which would gradually turn the traditional "fee for service" Medicare program into a less generous voucher system that would lose purchasing power as time goes on.

That would mean seniors would have to pay higher premiums or receive less extensive health coverage.

<snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Strange to think we were recently debating a public option
How quickly things change

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlabamaLibrul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. We were debating a public option? I mean, *we* were, but the politicians were? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. "The bill I sign must include a Public Option"
Yep. I think a politician said that


:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Exactly. False hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Slit Skirt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. is there a reason we have a deficit committee
where 14 out of the 18 are conservatives that represent big corporations?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
704wipes Donating Member (966 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. So the deficit commission enters 'death panel' territory
Pete Peterson is a more evil fuck than Dick Cheney, 10 times over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. So have they reported?!1 or is it preliminary n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. Another transfer of government money into the pockets of the insurance companies
Money that we paid in specifically to make sure we would have healthcare in our old age.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
34. And a complete abandonment of the governments ability to negotiate prices.
More gouging ahead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. I feel so hopeful! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. This countries main problem are people. People are in
the way in this country. Just think of all of the profits if they got rid of people except themselves.

They are certifiable screwballs. They want no common good in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. did the president think this would not blow up in his face?
his name is all over this shit and he`s given the right wing enough talking points to get him unelected in 2012.

who ever advised him that this way a winning idea...oh wait,that guy is in chicago trying to con people to believe he actually lived there for the last year...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I really hope he loses his run for mayor in Chicago. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
24. The op title is misleading. It might be correct to say "Paul Ryan wants to eliminate medicare."
Edited on Thu Nov-18-10 03:28 PM by mzmolly
Read the entire article for more info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestate10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. Can't you see?
The Commission is not Obama's commission. The Commission is republican's Waterloo. Obama will not have to write and approve the legislation that will be required to enact the recommendations. Time to play clever defense. Gather facts that show the changes that democrats want will or have saved money, leave it to republicans to propose and get approved cuts in federal spending on programs like SS and Medicare. Or, have republicans be forced to raise taxes and/or deductibles if they do not have the guts to cut. The millions of 65+ that voted republican during the midterms will be having unpleasant dreams soon. I seem hard hearted, but I say good for the oldsters that see their votes come back to haunt them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeoConsSuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Who appointed the commission members?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Appointments were made by the WH, and by leadership of
each Party in both houses of the Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtown1123 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #17
28. But, Obama did appoint Simpson and Bowles.
Simpson is the nut who said Social Security is a giant milk cow with 310,000,000 tits. Also, Bowles is on the board of Morgan Stanley so we know where his loyalties are. Why would Obama appoint those two as co-chairs??!! It's very frustrating indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
11. I think I'll just have to give up and accept that there are nothing but Republicans in the US govt.
It seems that everyone is falling over themselves to allow Republicans to grab everything that we have and give it to the rich elite.

There is no one, including Obama, who seems to be doing anything to counter this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #11
27. I am seriously considering telling my grandchildren, male and female alike,
to go live in another country with great public services for a while in the hopes of marrying a citizen and hopefully being able to become citizens themselves eventually...I have known some Americans who did just that...they were doing postgrad work abroad and found spouses who were natives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #27
35. I'm married to a Japanese, but unfortunately she became an American citizen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #35
41. A few years back I wouldn't have said it. That was then. This is now.
I see our social safety net, inadequate as it was, further torn apart and I'm truly scared for my granchildren going forward...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pa28 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
16. Or you could rebuild the foundation with a Medicare for all public option.
Unfortunately profits are stake and instead of seeing the healthcare cost bubble as a problem they see it as 19% of GDP and therefore untouchable. Health care rationing is a death sentence for Medicare that will eventually lead to total privatization and nobody knows it better than Rivlin and Ryan.

The very serious people strike again.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
18. CBO - Preliminary Analysis of Rivlin-Ryan Health Care Proposal
http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/119xx/doc11966/11-17-Rivlin-Ryan_Preliminary_Analysis.pdf

"Congressman Ryan and his staff recently provided specifications for a proposal that would
substantially change federal payments under the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Although an
extensive analysis of that proposal is not feasible in the time available, CBO has conducted a
preliminary analysis of its major provisions—the results of which are summarized here.

Key Features of the Proposal
MEDICARE

People who turn 65 in 2021 or later years would not enroll in the current Medicare program
but instead would receive a voucher with which to purchase private health insurance..."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trackfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
19. I vomit this out. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
20. Here come the real shots. As I've always said, the long knives are for Medicare
The Wealthcare and Profit Protection Act picture ought to be coming into focus a little clearer right about now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Bingo! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
22. kick nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
23. Not really. READ THE ARTICLE PEOPLE....
Edited on Thu Nov-18-10 03:41 PM by mzmolly
"The plan by Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., and Democratic economist Alice Rivlin of the panel would seem to face steep odds with most other panel Democrats."

...

"Democrats say the approach indiscriminately slashes Medicare."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #23
36. The fact it is even debated by the Obama commission is disgraceful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. We should highlight the "values" of the republic party whenever possible.
I can think of few better ways to do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
county worker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
25. Why do we need to add a middleman?
Edited on Thu Nov-18-10 03:28 PM by county worker
Right now, Medicare money goes to the hospital for part A and either the the patient or doctor for part B.

Vouchers would only insert insurance companies with their rules and denials of coverage in between the government and the provider. Also the insurance companies are for profit and has high administration costs so the money does not go as much to coverage as Medicare now does.

This idea makes no logical sense.

The only reason for this is that it fits the right wing idea of no government and more money for corporations. That is just the opposite that we stand for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
26. No Medicare No Social Security No VA benefits No Medicaid
No Unemployment benefits


but give all tax money
for the Banks Corporations and MILITARY

that is our tax money well spent

oh forget about Education its toast
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. DLC/NDC/neocons' wet dream is becoming reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
30. Well, I Guess Grayson Was Correct... I Think I'm Going To DIE QUICKLY! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
a kennedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
31. I just can't stand it.....
:mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
32. It should be the streets,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
33. I think this bird will fly about as well as privatizing SS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
somone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
38. Executive Summary: If you're not rich, then go die in the gutter
just like in India or wherever

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
39. Not surprised. Disgusted and angry, but not surprised.
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
40. Next will be misleading post headlines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC