Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ten Reasons the Social Security Proposal of the Fiscal Commission Co-Chairs Should be DOA (Dead on A

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 05:52 AM
Original message
Ten Reasons the Social Security Proposal of the Fiscal Commission Co-Chairs Should be DOA (Dead on A
http://strengthensocialsecurity.org/sites/default/files/TenReasonsFiscalCommissionProposalShouldBeDOA_FINAL.pdf

The Fiscal Commission Co-Chairs’ Social Security proposals are an equal opportunity disaster. So soon after an angry electorate has expressed its frustration with a Washington political class that does not appear to be listening, it totally ignores the will of the people. Poll after poll has shown that Democrats, Republicans, and Independents reject the punitive cuts in America’s economic security that the co-chairs have proposed. Their proposal:

1.Deeply cuts the benefits of middle-class families. The proposal would cut retirement benefits by more than 35% for young people entering the workforce today. Today’s 20-year old workers who retire at age 65 would see their benefits cut by 17% if their wages average $43,000 over their working lives, by 30% if their wages average $69,000 over their working lives, and by 36% if their wages average $107,000 over their working lives, according to the Social Security Chief Actuary.1 The proposed cuts would apply to retirees, disabled workers and their families, children who have lost parents, and widows and widowers.

2. Closes Social Security’s long-range funding gap primarily by cutting already low benefits, rather than by raising taxes on those who can most afford to pay. Ninety-two percent of Social Security’s projected funding gap is closed by cutting promised benefits, according to the proposal. The benefit formula change eliminates 45% of the projected shortfall, raising the retirement age eliminates 21%, and reducing the COLA eliminates 26%.2 Social Security's benefits are already inadequate – just $13,000 a year on average3 – and should not be cut further. Instead, Social Security’s long-range funding gap could be closed, as most Americans want, by requiring those employees (and their employers) who make more than $107,000 a year to pay Social Security taxes on all their wages, as the rest of us do who earn less.4

3. Raises the retirement age to 69. This is a 13% benefit cut on top of the 13% cut already made when the retirement age was increased from 65 to 67, according to the Social Security Administration.5

4. Raises the early retirement age to 64. Most Americans claim Social Security benefits at age 62 even though the benefits are currently reduced by 25%, when they do so.6 Millions take early retirement because they work in physically demanding jobs, have health problems, or can no longer find work. Raising the early retirement age will shut them out of the system when they are most vulnerable, potentially forcing them to seek disability benefits or welfare.

5. Discriminates against lower-wage workers. Over the last quarter century, life expectancy of lower-income men increased by one year compared to five years for upper-income men. Lower-income women have experienced declines in longevity.7 Yet, the higher retirement age applies to rich and poor, healthy and sick, alike. In effect, the proposal says to lower wage workers that they must work longer because the rich are living longer!

6. Reduces the annual Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) for Social Security beneficiaries. The “chained CPI” proposal would reduce benefits by 0.3% a year on average.8 This will result in a 3.7% cut in benefits after 10 years in retirement beginning at age 65 and a 6.5% cut after 20 years, according to the Social Security Chief Actuary.9 If anything, the COLA should be increased because it does not adequately take account of skyrocketing medical costs, which hit seniors and people with disabilities hardest.

7. Hurts current retirees, contrary to promises made by the Co-Chairs. The change in the COLA calculation would begin in 2011 and affect all beneficiaries, not just retirees.

8. Breaks faith with our nation’s veterans and service members. Social Security benefits are veterans’ benefits – 43% of veterans receive Social Security.10 Our men and women in uniform (and their families) will see their Social Security disability benefits cut deeply if they are seriously injured in combat. If they die in combat, their survivors’ benefits will also be cut substantially. And veterans’ retirement benefits will be cut significantly just like for all other Americans.

9. Harms our grandchildren the most. In the name of helping our grandchildren, the proposal cuts their benefits the most. The younger a person is the deeper the cuts because of the increase in the retirement age and the changes in the benefit formula.11

10. Breaks Social Security’s promise with hard-working Americans. Social Security belongs to the people who have worked hard all their lives and contributed to the program. It is based on a promise that if you pay in then you earn the right to guaranteed benefits. The Co-Chairs’ proposal would break that promise.

-----------------------------------
1- Social Security Administration (SSA), letter from Stephen C. Goss, Chief Actuary, to Fiscal Commission Staff,

“Fiscal Commission Plan 2a: Tax Light Plan,” pp. 4, 5, November 9, 2010. The wage amounts are in constant 2010 dollars.

2- Co-Chairs’ Proposal, “Restoring Social Security Solvency,” p. 48, Nov. 10, 2010. Available at http://www.fiscalcommission.gov/sites/fiscalcommission.gov/files/documents/CoChair_Draft.pdf.

3- Average monthly benefit amounts calculated by multiplying by twelve from SSA, “Fast Facts & Figures About Social Security, 2010, ” p. 15. Available at

http://www.socialsecurity.gov/policy/docs/chartbooks/fast_facts/2010/fast_facts10.pdf

4- Polling data available at

http://strengthensocialsecurity.org/sites/default/files/SSSCHighlightsofKeyPollingQuestionsonSocialSecurity.pdf

5- Social Security Administration, “Effect of Early or Delayed Retirement on Retirement Benefits,” 2010. Available at

http://www.ssa.gov/OACT/ProgData/ar_drc.html. Each one-year increase represents a cut of 6% to 7%.

6- Social Security Administration, “Retirement Benefits by Year of Birth.” Available at

http://www.socialsecurity.gov/retire2/agereduction.htm. The 25% reduction applies to people who claim benefits at their 62nd birthday when the normal retirement age is 66. People accepting benefits later in their 62nd year have slightly lower reductions.

7- Harry C. Ballantyne, Lawrence Mishel and Monique Morrissey, “Briefing Paper #273: Social Security and the Federal Deficit, Not Cause and Effect,” Economic Policy Institute, August 6, 2010, p. 8. Available at

http://epi.3cdn.net/99133adf653fd78719_qym6b95et.pdf

8- SSA letter to Fiscal Commission Staff, footnote 4, p. 4.

9- Social Security Administration, letter from Stephen C. Goss, Chief Actuary, to Rep. Earl Pomeroy, “Table 3.

Indexing Cost of Living Adjustments (COLA) to a Chained Version of CPI-W,” October 18, 2010. Available at

http://waysandmeans.house.gov/media/pdf/111/SSA_Actuary_BenefitsExample_Letter.pdf

Using this lower COLA would cut benefits by $108 billion over 10 years, according to the Congressional Budget Office, “Budget Options: Volume 2,” August, 2009, p. 147. Available at

http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/102xx/doc10294/08-06-BudgetOptions.pdf

10- Social Security Administration, “Military Veterans Paper Tables Updated CPS 2009,” 2009.

11- SSA letter to Fiscal Commission Staff, p. 4.

-------------------------------------------------

Take your pick (or not!). Here is a humongous list of articles & opinion assembled by Social Security Works from yesterday’s announcement:

- Debt Commission Report Targets Social Security, Medicare, Sam Stein, Huffington Post http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/10/debt-commission-report-social-security-medicare-_n_781606.html

- Ad campaign takes aim at national debt, Joe Hallett, Columbus Dispatch (OH), http://www.dispatch.com/live/content/local_news/stories/2010/11/11/ad-campaign-takes-aim-at-national-debt.html?sid=101

- What deficit cutting would mean for Social Security, Mark Miller, Reuters, http://blogs.reuters.com/deep-pocket/2010/11/10/what-deficit-cutting-would-mean-for-social-security/

- Many deficit commission staffers paid by outside groups, Dan Eggen, Washington Post, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/10/AR2010111007481.html

- Debt Plan Would Cut Taxes, Social Security, Medicare, Heidi Przybyla and Brian Faler, Business Week, http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-11-10/debt-plan-would-cut-taxes-social-security-medicare.html

_ Panel Seeks Social Security Cuts and Tax Increases, Jackie Calmes, New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/11/us/politics/11fiscal.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

_ Obama Deficit Commission Criticized for Proposals to Slash Social Security, Medicare, Democracy Now, http://www.democracynow.org/seo/2010/11/11/obama_deficit_commission_criticized_for_proposals

- Is Either Party Serious about Cutting the Deficit?, Stephanie Condon, CBS News, http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20022339-503544.html

- Deficit panel offers 'painful' program for U.S. , Michael A. Memoli, Los Angeles Times, http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/sc-dc-fiscal-commission-draft-20101110,0,7045687.story

- Obama fiscal panel proposes drastic changes to Social Security , Jordan Fabian, The Hill, http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/128649-fiscal-panel-proposes-drastic-changes-to-social-security

- Obama budget panel proposes health and defense cut, BBC News, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-11730119

- Panel proposes $3.8T savings plan, Social Security changes, Richard Wolf, USA Today, http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2010-11-10-federal-savings-social-security_N.htm

- Panel leaders propose Social Security cuts, Meredith Shiner, Politico, http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1110/44945.html

- Obama to Congress: Stop shooting down deficit proposals, David Jackson, USA Today, http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2010/11/obama-to-congress-stop-shooting-down-deficit-proposals/1

- Deficit Panel Pushes Cuts, John McKinnon, Wall Street Journal, http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703805004575607691377554472.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

- Deficit Panel Recommends Raising Retirement Age, Slate, http://slatest.slate.com/id/2274482/

- Senate budget chairman urges action on deficit, Associated Press, http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iGPRXCizkDugbT0BO-abZebkQo0w?docId=5cc9e437c3c24679a8d37c224eada915

- Highlights of deficit reduction proposals, Associated Press, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/10/AR2010111005009.html

- Deficit Panel Proposal Draws Love, Hate, Reticence, Frank James, NPR http://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpolitics/2010/11/10/131223882/deficit-panel-proposal-draws-love-hate

- Deficit panel co-chairs recommend $200 bln in cuts, Wallace Witkowski, MarketWatch, http://www.marketwatch.com/story/deficit-panel-co-chairs-recommend-200-bln-in-cuts-2010-11-10-1354350

- With Social Security proposal, deficit panel touches third rail, Kevin Hall, Miami Herald, http://www.miamiherald.com/2010/11/10/1919188/with-social-security-proposal.html

- Deficit Panel Pushes Cuts To Social Security, Melissa Block, NPR, http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=131223274

- Obama Debt Commission Proposal Offends Everyone -- So What Would You Cut?, ABC News, http://blogs.abcnews.com/nightlinedailyline/2010/11/obama-debt-commission-proposal-offends-everyone-so-what-would-you-cut.html

- Targeted Improvements, 75-Year Financing Plan Would Strengthen Social Security for the Long Run, PR Newswire, http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/targeted-improvements-75-year-financing-plan-would-strengthen-social-security-for-the-long-run-107222283.html

- Sanders Says Social Security Not In Trouble, Samantha Fields, Vermont Public Radio, http://www.vpr.net/news_detail/89256/

- Trumka on Social Security: Don't Raise Retirement Age, Kathy Kiely, National Journal, http://www.nationaljournal.com/politics/trumka-on-social-security-don-t-raise-retirement-age-20101111

- Deficit Plan Matches $3.8 Trillion Math With Tough Politics, Heidi Przybyla and Brian Faler, Bloomberg News http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-11-10/deficit-reduction-panel-s-plan-would-seek-to-cut-social-security-medicare.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kick for Friday n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faryn Balyncd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faryn Balyncd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. .
Edited on Fri Nov-12-10 10:22 PM by Faryn Balyncd
(dupe)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. Kick for Sunday morning n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC