|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
yellowcanine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 11:35 AM Original message |
Is another shoe about to drop on Clarence Thomas? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HopeHoops (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 11:42 AM Response to Original message |
1. Hell, if they'll pay me enough, I'LL claim he wanted to have sex with me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
monmouth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 11:42 AM Response to Original message |
2. I sort of think the same thing. Someone in his office at SCOTUS is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 11:53 AM Response to Reply #2 |
7. If that is the case then the twit sleeping with Thomas should be cruicified publicly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DavidDvorkin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 11:43 AM Response to Original message |
3. If the charges were somehow proved |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladjf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 11:44 AM Response to Original message |
4. So far as I know, "shoes don't drop" on Supreme Court Justices. Nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ozymanithrax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 11:46 AM Response to Original message |
5. It would take a lot more than a tell all book to get Thomas to leave... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
6. The only way to remove a SCOTUS justice is through |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 11:56 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Unfortunately he and Scalia are sociopaths with no shame |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 12:07 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Thomas will not resign except to avoid conviction after impeachment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 12:24 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. There is another option - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 12:13 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. I fear you're correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cilla4progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 01:02 PM Response to Reply #6 |
20. I'm with you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 01:53 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. "What is going on?" It is almost Halloween? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 12:16 PM Response to Original message |
11. Diversion from Thomas' private activities that are in conflict with his doing his job. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AnArmyVeteran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 12:29 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. Can you imagine if a liberal judge's wife were a political activist? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 12:32 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Thank the FCC rules on media ownership for this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 12:33 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. Yes, I am sure Orrin Hatch and Jeff Sessions would both get their tighty whiteys all wadded up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bozita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 10:12 PM Response to Reply #18 |
34. Do Jeff Sessions' tighty whiteys include that nice pointy white headgear? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RamboLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 12:21 PM Response to Original message |
12. Nothing will happen with Thomas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Touchdown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 12:25 PM Response to Original message |
14. I bet he's pissed at his wife for opening up her mouth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AnArmyVeteran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 12:32 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. I doubt he's pissed. I bet it's a preemptive act for things to come. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raschel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
19. I believe Ginny/Clarence Thomas made the call to pre empt the McEwen information. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 01:35 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Unless - I just thought of this - Ginny Thomas is actually stabbing Clarence in the back for some |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
monmouth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 02:24 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. Could be. A "big family dispute" ensued and this is her payback to him...I like it!...n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dbt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 01:51 PM Response to Original message |
22. I don't care WHAT's about to drop. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cherchez la Femme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 03:51 PM Response to Original message |
25. Isn't he untouchable by now in his position? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pgodbold (953 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 04:17 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. He is not untouchable as a Supreme. He can and should be impeached. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 08:33 PM Response to Original message |
27. Deleted message |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 08:41 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. wtf? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Diana Prince (267 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 09:14 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. Alert |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 09:22 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. I've alerted, too. Reprehensible post! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Velveteen Ocelot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 09:19 PM Response to Reply #27 |
31. That's reprehensible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
butterfly77 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 09:16 PM Response to Original message |
30. Hope so.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CoffeeCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 10:03 PM Response to Original message |
33. Clarence Thomas... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 10:10 AM Response to Original message |
35. K & R! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:31 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC