Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GM prepares to shut Indianapolis plant after workers reject concessions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 09:32 AM
Original message
GM prepares to shut Indianapolis plant after workers reject concessions

General Motors Co. has started the wind-down of its Indianapolis stamping plant after UAW-represented workers yesterday overwhelmingly rejected a proposed 50 percent pay cut that was sought by a potential new owner of the plant.

GM spokeswoman Kim Carpenter said GM has ended its search for a potential buyer.

“We are disappointed that UAW Local 23 was not able to ratify the proposed labor agreement,” Carpenter said in an e-mail.

“As previously announced, we will continue steps to wind down the facility, which will cease production in mid-2011 and close by December 2011.”

Gregory Clark, UAW Local 23 shop chairman, said last week that the cuts were too deep and the plant's 650 workers would take their chances transferring to another GM plant should jobs open. He said about one-third of the hourly work force is eligible to retire.

Clark was critical of the intervention by the UAW International into the issue. In May, the workers overwhelmingly said they did not want to initiate concession talks with the potential new owner, stamper J.D. Norman Industries.


http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100928/OEM/100929849/1424



The potential new owner was Chinese. They wanted SKILLED lifelong machinists to work for $14 an hour and cut benefits to the bone. Of course many here will whine, that $14 is a lot of money. Bullshit. $14 an hour is $28,000 a year gross. Support a family and pay a mortgage on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. Repeal Taft-Hartley

By banning 'sympathy strikes' this odious legislation removed one of labor's chief weapons from the game. A bunch of sympathy strikes would would give GM pause, to say the least.

Why has the Democratic party not revisited this reactionary law? Whose side are they on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Whose side are they on? Follow the money.....
Yesterday the opportunity to roll back the law rewarding companies for outsourcing was defeated by four DemoRATS who sided with the Pukes to kill the bill.

http://www.mlive.com/michigan-job-search/index.ssf/2010/09/senate_anti-outsourcing_bill_fails_to_ad.html

An anti-outsourcing bill introduced by Senate Democrats was defeated in a cloture vote today on a vote of 53-45. Four Democrats joined all Republicans and Connecticut Independent Joe Lieberman to defeat the bill.

The bill would have ended certain tax credits, deductions and deferrals for U.S. companies expanding or moving overseas and given companies a two-year payroll tax holiday for any worker who was hired in the U.S. as a result of bringing jobs back from overseas.


The Senate Democrats voting against the bill’s advancement were Max Baucus and Jon Tester of Montana; Mark Warner of Virginia, and Ben Nelson of Nebraska. Lieberman, who also voted no, caucuses with Democrats.

What the fuck do they have to worry about in Montana and Nebraska. And I AM SICK of these small state Senators deciding for the rest of us how our government is run.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Kinda my point

What you point out, the lack of party discipline, is a set piece which lets the Party have it both ways, "oh we're for this but these few won't play..." This guarantees the status quo and I think they like it that way.

The Senate is an anti-democratic institution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Damn.
When up for primary re-election, I hope those Senators and their constituents get daily reminders of this vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. I too am disgusted with the 4 stupid dems (little d) and Indy Joe for fouling this bill.
How have these clowns accounted for their vote?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sinistrous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. "Concessions"?
My ass. Those terms were unconditional surrender.

Sucks that the plant will probably close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brickbat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
6. Better to die on your feet than live on your knees.
I respect the hell out of these brothers and sisters. I know that some people wouldn't make their choice and will say they should have taken the terrible cuts...but I'm not one of them.

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. At least a quarter of them (about 175) are OLD enough to retire
these are SKILLED machinists, physically fit to handle the rigors of a HUGE stamping plant, whose experience is invaluable. Now because of short term profit shortsightedness, they are out of the work force.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brickbat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. More and more, skill and ability to learn don't matter.
It's how low you're willing to go. Competition is supposed to improve the quality of competitors, but in the wrecked and crooked game we have going on, the cheapest ones win almost every time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC