|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
global1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 10:21 AM Original message |
I Keep Hearing On Cable News Shows That Americans Don't Want New Refineries In Their Back Yards..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 10:24 AM Response to Original message |
1. I'VE never heard that statement backed up either... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 10:25 AM Response to Original message |
2. Fucking welfare queens want the state to pay for their refineries. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
prole_for_peace (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 12:51 PM Response to Reply #2 |
24. .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
C_U_L8R (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 10:27 AM Response to Original message |
3. Those "experts" are oil flaks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 10:28 AM Response to Original message |
4. They want the government to pay to build them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notadmblnd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 10:37 AM Response to Reply #4 |
8. I don;t have a problem with the government building them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 10:54 AM Response to Reply #8 |
13. Yup! If more people start talking like this, it might motivate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 10:38 AM Response to Reply #4 |
9. Not to mention that the cost of new refineries that can handle the cruder |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wakeme2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 10:28 AM Response to Original message |
5. The thing you GOT to remember is Bush was Gov of Texas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 10:29 AM Response to Original message |
6. There are plenty of refineries |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
conscious evolution (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 12:39 PM Response to Reply #6 |
21. 30 + refineries shut down in the last 10 or so years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gravity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 10:29 AM Response to Original message |
7. Do you want a refinery in your backyard? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal renegade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 10:56 AM Response to Reply #7 |
16. yep....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 10:39 AM Response to Original message |
10. Who needs *new* refineries? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 10:55 AM Response to Reply #10 |
15. It is interesting that they are often taken "offline" for maintenance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kansas Wyatt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 10:45 AM Response to Original message |
11. Oh Bullshit! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 12:25 PM Response to Reply #11 |
19. Of course! More refining capacity means LOWER PRICES. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gravity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 12:27 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. More refining capacity means greater profits to individual companies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 12:44 PM Response to Reply #11 |
23. Senator Ron Wyden did an investigation in 2001 which confirms |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChazII (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 10:53 AM Response to Original message |
12. Arizona needs one and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IDemo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 10:54 AM Response to Original message |
14. They claim expansion of existing refineries is doing the job, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Strelnikov_ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 11:02 AM Response to Original message |
17. There are 'Brownfields', abandoned refinery sites, all over the Country |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 12:25 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. I have to admit, I don't want MY coastline looking like LA. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
On the Road (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
22. It's True That Most Towns Don't Want a Refinery Nearby |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:39 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC