Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cuccinelli, Virginia delegate accused of bypassing lawmakers in legal-opinion tactic

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
mahatmakanejeeves Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-10 07:32 AM
Original message
Cuccinelli, Virginia delegate accused of bypassing lawmakers in legal-opinion tactic
I think this is what they call judicial activism. It certainly does not look like orginalism.

Cuccinelli, Virginia delegate accused of bypassing lawmakers in legal-opinion tactic

By Anita Kumar
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, September 21, 2010

RICHMOND -- Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli II has issued several controversial legal opinions in the past few months, concluding, for instance, that police could check the immigration status of those stopped by law-enforcement officers, that the state could impose stricter oversight of clinics that perform abortions and that local governments could allow religious holiday displays on public property.

In each instance, the request for the opinion came from the same person: Del. Robert G. Marshall (Prince William), a like-minded Republican who shares Cuccinelli's far-right views.

Marshall has sought seven opinions from Cuccinelli since the attorney general took office in January, and has three pending, including one that questions whether Gov. Robert F. McDonnell (R) has the authority to seek additional stimulus funds from the federal government. The number of requests is extraordinarily high, and it is generally unmatched by any legislator in an attorney general's entire four-year term.

Observers say their relationship has become symbiotic -- one that helps each promote themselves and advance their interests -- but in a way no one envisioned before.

"It's not unconstitutional,'' said A.E. Dick Howard, a law professor at the University of Virginia and one of the drafters of the modern Virginia Constitution. "It's just not contemplated. It's outside what the framers of the Constitution would have seen."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-10 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. The Cooch is a NeoCon's NeoCon. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC