Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mushrraf accepted seven US demands in 24 hours after 9/11 terror attacks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-10 11:23 AM
Original message
Mushrraf accepted seven US demands in 24 hours after 9/11 terror attacks
Source: Economic Times

ISLAMABAD: As the US prepared to invade Afghanistan after the 9/11 terror attacks in 2001, the then Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf tried to convince the Bush administration to negotiate with the Taliban, but accepted "unconditionally" in 24 hours all seven demands made by the US such as stopping al Qaeda at the border, providing the US with blanket landing rights to conduct operations and territorial and naval access and help in "destroying Osama Bin Laden," after his proposal was 'bluntly' rejected by Washington.

According to the classified documents released by the National Security Archive of the George Washington University, two days after al Qaeda unleashed terror on the US, the demands were to stop al Qaeda at the border, provide the US with blanket landing rights to conduct operations; provide territorial and naval access, provide intelligence; publicly condemn terrorist attacks, cut off recruits and supplies to the Taliban, and break diplomatic relations with the Taliban and help the US destroy Osama Bin Ladin.

"In a 90-minute meeting on September 14, Musharraf said he had studied the points and discussed them in an all-day meeting with his corps commanders and other ranking military officers. He (Musharraf) said he accepted the points without conditions and that his military leadership concurred," the Daily Times quoted the document, as saying.

...

he ISI chief told the ambassador that America's strategic objectives of getting Osama Bin Laden and al Qaeda would best be accomplished by coercing the Taliban to do it themselves.

However, the US envoy to Pakistan Wendy Chamberlin said that it was too late to enter into dialogues with the Taliban, which controlled Afghanistan at that time.

...

Although Pakistan denied that it was a safe haven for anti-American forces, a State Department-issued paper for former vice president Dick Cheney claimed "some Taliban leaders operate with relative impunity in some Pakistani cities, and may still enjoy support from the lower echelons of the ISI".

Read more: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/Mushrraf-accepted-seven-US-demands-in-24-hours-after-9/11-terror-attacks/articleshow/6571727.cms
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-10 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. Cheney, et. al. had that list of demands at the ready.

Go to my sig line link.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SnakeEyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-10 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Itz a konspiracy!
9/11 truthers make us look bad. Nobody should bother reading that site after seeing Q1. Anyone that doesn't know the answer, which was reported on and following 9/11, or can't understand why you wouldn't want the president heading back to a major city, of millions where he is visible, that is the target of an attack which may have multiple stages, and in more predictable places when he can conduct business via AF1 (despite the troubles they had that day) and the major military command and control operations facilities elsewhere in the country such as the US Strategic Command Center in Nebraska (which is where he ended up) shouldn't be taken seriously. Many people advised him not to return to DC. Many accounts of that day state the President had the desire to return.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-10 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. You pull your head ever so slightly out of the sand and that's all you have to say?
"Nobody should bother reading that site after seeing Q1." Wow? You scared? It's the 9/11 Commission's web site. Ya know, the ones who put out the Konspiracy theory the stenographers duly noted.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SnakeEyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. No it's not the 9/11 commission's site...
It's a group of some 9/11 victims's family members, calling themselves the "Family Steering Committee", that have bought into truther nonsense and want the 9/11 commission to ask their questions.

If you're going to link to that stuff you really should know what you're actually linking too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC