So is the AZ boycott over with the ruling today? Raul Grijalva says so.

[lonestarnot]

:shrug:

[EFerrari]

1. No, Brewer is appealing the decision. n/t

[lonestarnot]

3. Yeah, tomorrow morning. Leatherface wants to be sure she gets face in front of the

camera as long as possible. SCOTUS will have final word. What do you think they will rule? They like the unitary executive and federal power. Pugs could be ruled against by they own creeps. :evilgrin:

[EFerrari]

5. I think their creeps will have to rule against them

or they undermine their own authority! :woohoo:

[lonestarnot]

6. In a box baby!

:rofl:

[Swamp Rat]

25. hee hee!

:D

[ProgressiveProfessor]

2. Based on a TRO? I would think not

[lonestarnot]

4. Well did someone forget to call Raul?

:rofl: I mean what about temporary doesn't he get?

[EFerrari]

7. Maybe he had to say that to appease some business types.

Don't worry. I don't think anyone listens anyway.

lol

[lonestarnot]

11. Welp, there was someone just recently, a comedian, a band or someone I am sorry won't be coming

here. Can't think of who it was, but I remember thinking crap. Leatherface's face got uglier at that moment anyway.

[pinboy3niner]

20. You can see the list of artists boycotting at the soundstrike site:

http://www.thesoundstrike.net/

[lonestarnot]

21. Yes Rage Against the Machine. :(

[pinboy3niner]

22. Lo siento

When all this is over, those acts will come back to AZ. Brewer, however, won't look any better... :)

[lonestarnot]

24. Make my fucking day! Thanks!

:rofl:

[ProudDad]

8. Grijalva says so

I say no...

But exercise some discrimination. Analyze who owns it and where it is.

Boycott the republican owned Arizona Diamondbacks but patronize the Anti-SB1070 Phoenix Suns...

Stuff like that...

Boycott Maricopa County -- boycott Cochise County -- Come to Pima County...

Come to Tucson -- we're reasonably sane here with a Sheriff who would not have enforced this fascist POS anyway...

[EFerrari]

9. I haven't been to Tucson since 1990 or so when we went to Spring training.

I bet it's huge now. My boys dragged me to that old west theme park, "Old Tucson". They loved it.

[ProudDad]

17. It's huge

100 square miles...1 million people

But it still has a small town feel -- especially "downtown" where I live...

[lonestarnot]

12. Did you really mean "exercise some discrimination?" or did you mean something else?

[ProudDad]

16. I meant think about who you are boycotting...

I probably should have used the word "discretion"...

[lonestarnot]

19. Dat's zactly what I thought you meant. Tanks!

[Ozymanithrax]

10. Like a judge declaring parts of the law void means the Arizona Congress...

governor, and Sheriff Joe Arpaio are suddenly multiculturalist heros.

It ain't over until the Supreme Court Sings.

[lonestarnot]

13. Didn't we know that before we wasted the money already spent?

Why didn't somebody already file something to get there already? My contention was that was the original intention of the creation of such a bullshit law in the first place, all so this could get to Judge Grimace who sits on SCOTUS.

[Ozymanithrax]

14. Lower courts get the first chop at the law.

It will work its way up through the appellate courts.

To me, the Constitution is pretty clear, and only a totally partisan Supreme Court would try to overthrow this decision.

Oh shit....

[lonestarnot]

15. And Judge Grimace will write the opinion for the Court.

[lonestarnot]

18. Direct Appeal to SCOTUS 2-4.212

From time to time Congress provides for direct Supreme Court review of district court judgments in a particular kind of case. See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. § 555(c)(2) (Cable Act); 2 U.S.C. § 692(b) (Line Item Veto Act). If the United States Attorney is working on a case in which direct appeal to the Supreme Court is provided for by statute, the United States Attorney should consult closely with the appropriate division as to how to proceed after judgment is entered by the district court.

[TheKentuckian]

23. Arizona is still pursuing their folly so no.