Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US Supreme Court deals pedophilia blow for Vatican

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babsbunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 04:09 PM
Original message
US Supreme Court deals pedophilia blow for Vatican
http://rawstory.com/rs/2010/0628/supreme-court-deals-pedophilia-blow-vatican/

By Agence France-Presse
Monday, June 28th, 2010 -- 11:21 am

The US Supreme Court declined Monday to hear an appeal by the Vatican in a landmark case that opens the way for priests in the United States to stand trial for pedophilia.

Allowing a federal appeals court ruling to stand, the decision means Vatican officials including theoretically Pope Benedict XVI could face questioning under oath related to a litany of child sex abuse cases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Oceansaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MyNameGoesHere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. What an unfortunate headline
Edited on Mon Jun-28-10 04:13 PM by MyNameGoesHere
pedophilia blow? But I am glad that there is a ruling in favor of justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I was thinking the same thing.

It must be the summer crew at raw story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Agree! Not funny! + Confusing: "for"????? should be against or something like that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. wow. now there's a surprise considering...
any conjecture as to why the two uber catholics let it by?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happy_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. theoretically Pope Benedict XVI could face questioning under oath
Bring it on!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. Talk about yer reality TV...
I can't wait for the trials to begin!

:bounce:

--imm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Today Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. If only "under oath" actually meant anything. Seems liars lie, even when hard facts can prove them
wrong. Furthermore, I think anyone can take the 5th. Still this is better than if the USSC had voted in the other direction entirely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. As cynical as that sounds, I have to agree with you.
Edited on Mon Jun-28-10 05:20 PM by Kber
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC