Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nixon approved of abortion in cases of rape and to prevent bi-racial babies.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 06:23 AM
Original message
Nixon approved of abortion in cases of rape and to prevent bi-racial babies.
WASHINGTON — On Jan. 22, 1973, when the Supreme Court struck down laws criminalizing abortion in Roe v. Wade, President Richard M. Nixon made no public statement. But the next day, newly released tapes reveal, he privately expressed ambivalence.


Nixon worried that greater access to abortions would foster “permissiveness,” and said that “it breaks the family.” But he also saw a need for abortion in some cases — like interracial pregnancies, he said.

“There are times when an abortion is necessary. I know that. When you have a black and a white,” he told an aide, before adding, “Or a rape.”


http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/24/us/politics/24nixon.html?_r=2&adxnnl=1&ref=richard_milhous_nixon&adxnnlx=1277331435-UnbgXSIY740YaKDT85UKbg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CBR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 06:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. Ahh.... there is that liberal Nixon I keep hearing about!
Edited on Thu Jun-24-10 06:27 AM by CBR
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 06:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. That's precisely why so many people find it disturbing
Edited on Thu Jun-24-10 06:55 AM by depakid
that Nixon was in fact more liberal than many of the people in the Democratic leadership on various issues.

I'm thinking you probably already knew that, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 06:40 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. IMO... his opinion on aborting biracial babies trumps. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 07:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. On what issues was Nixon more liberal than the Democrats?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Dems just passed what was essentially his health care plan (his was actually somewhat better)
and many of America's most environmental laws date from his administration.

He also signed expansions of social security and medicare.

To name a few.

Sad to see the state of affairs among many Democrats- that they can be compared with Nixon, isn't it?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Misunderstood. I thought you were talking about democrats
in the Nixon era.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Since the 1970s were 40 years ago now
And predated the Reagan era, that is not necessarily such a bad thing.

It is unfair to compare societies that different.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. I suppose the same could be said of his opinion on interracial marraige, etc.
After all, Loving v. Virginia only outlawed the prohibition in 1967.

I wouldn't say that myself- though I can see how it could be said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Loving v. Va. was never overruled
Not a good comparison either.

Yet the Reagan era occurred and we are supposed to be able to treat today's voters as if they were a liberal as those of 1972.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. You must have misread re: Loving
Edited on Thu Jun-24-10 08:41 AM by depakid
and you must not have read (or accepted this):

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=8311732&mesg_id=8312675

So yes- according to the credible data on the issues, today's voters are more liberal -but the party's controlling faction (and corporate patrons) are another story entirely).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 06:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. Ah, tricky Dicky. My favorite racist anti-Semite. What a guy.
I will never forgive Gerald Ford for that pardon, never. I hope Ford is burning at a hotter temperature than Dicky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gaedel Donating Member (802 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #2
20. You wonder what would have been a counter-factual history
1. If Watergate had been laughed off as normal election year fun and games.

2. Nixon had continued to govern without controversy given his big election mandate and solid Democratic control of the House and Senate.


Would aid have been cut off to Vietnam in 1974?

Would Carter have happened or would a senatorial Democrat been elected in 1976?

Would Reagan have happened or would the GOP stayed closer to the center?

Would 1994 have occurred?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 06:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. Republican family values. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. Well, since bi-racial babies are exactly the same as rape...
Good fucking God.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Yes, Republicans think both are tragedies. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBGLuthier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 06:46 AM
Response to Original message
7. The elder Bush and his Nazi daddy Prescott were big supporters
of Planned Parenthood primarily because they were afraid "minorities" would have too many children and overrun them there good white folk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
8. And just remember, he's one of the good republicans.
At least compared to todays breed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
14. I've run into right wingnuts who if pressed will admit that
they do not think abortion is so bad if poor women have them - meaning that their respect for human life is not really so important as they claim it is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Country clubber Republicons think that
Fundie ones don't. Since they have to make common cause with each other to get the Repukes elected, they don't talk about it to each other much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
18. This is old news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC