Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

President's address: "what led to this disaster was a breakdown of responsibility on the part of BP"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 09:54 PM
Original message
President's address: "what led to this disaster was a breakdown of responsibility on the part of BP"

Remarks of President Barack Obama

Saturday, May 22, 2010
Weekly Address
Washington, DC

One month ago this week, BP’s Deepwater Horizon drilling rig exploded off Louisiana’s coast, killing 11 people and rupturing an underwater pipe. The resulting oil spill has not only dealt an economic blow to Americans across the Gulf Coast, it also represents an environmental disaster.

In response, we are drawing on America’s best minds and using the world’s best technology to stop the leak. We’ve deployed over 1,100 vessels, about 24,000 personnel, and more than 2 million total feet of boom to help contain it. And we’re doing all we can to assist struggling fishermen, and the small businesses and communities that depend on them.

Folks on the Gulf Coast – and across America – are rightly demanding swift action to clean up BP’s mess and end this ordeal. But they’re also demanding to know how this happened in the first place, and how we can make sure it never happens again. That’s what I’d like to spend a few minutes talking with you about.

First and foremost, what led to this disaster was a breakdown of responsibility on the part of BP and perhaps others, including Transocean and Halliburton. And we will continue to hold the relevant companies accountable not only for being forthcoming and transparent about the facts surrounding the leak, but for shutting it down, repairing the damage it does, and repaying Americans who’ve suffered a financial loss.

But even as we continue to hold BP accountable, we also need to hold Washington accountable. Now, this catastrophe is unprecedented in its nature, and it presents a host of new challenges we are working to address. But the question is what lessons we can learn from this disaster to make sure it never happens again.

If the laws on our books are inadequate to prevent such an oil spill, or if we didn’t enforce those laws – I want to know it. I want to know what worked and what didn’t work in our response to the disaster, and where oversight of the oil and gas industry broke down. We know, for example, that a cozy relationship between oil and gas companies and agencies that regulate them has long been a source of concern.

Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar has taken steps to address this problem; steps that build on reforms he has been implementing since he took office. But we need to do a lot more to protect the health and safety of our people; to safeguard the quality of our air and water; and to preserve the natural beauty and bounty of America.

In recent weeks, we’ve taken a number of immediate measures to prevent another spill. We’ve ordered inspections of all deepwater operations in the Gulf of Mexico. We’ve announced that no permits for drilling new wells will go forward until the 30-day safety and environmental review I requested is complete. And I’ve called on Congress to pass a bill that would provide critical funds and tools to respond to this spill and better prepare us to confront any future spills.

But we also need to take a comprehensive look at how the oil and gas industry operates and how we regulate them. That is why, on Friday, I signed an executive order establishing the National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling. While there are a number of ongoing investigations, including an independent review by the National Academy of Engineering, the purpose of this Commission is to consider both the root causes of the disaster and offer options on what safety and environmental precautions we need to take to prevent a similar disaster from happening again. This Commission, I’d note, is similar to one proposed by Congresswoman Capps and Senator Whitehouse.

I’ve asked Democrat Bob Graham and Republican Bill Reilly to co-chair this Commission. Bob served two terms as Florida’s governor, and represented Florida as a United States Senator for almost two decades. During that time, he earned a reputation as a champion of the environment, leading the most extensive environmental protection effort in the state’s history.

Bill Reilly is chairman emeritus of the board of the World Wildlife Fund, and he is also deeply knowledgeable about the oil and gas industry. During the presidency of George H.W. Bush, Bill was Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, and his tenure encompassed the Exxon Valdez disaster.

I can’t think of two people who will bring greater experience or better judgment to the task at hand. In the days to come, I’ll appoint 5 other distinguished Americans – including scientists, engineers, and environmental advocates – to join them on the Commission. And I’m directing them to report back in 6 months with recommendations on how we can prevent – and mitigate the impact of – any future spills that result from offshore drilling.

One of the reasons I ran for President was to put America on the path to energy independence, and I have not wavered from that commitment. To achieve that goal, we must pursue clean energy and energy efficiency, and we’ve taken significant steps to do so. And we must also pursue domestic sources of oil and gas. Because it represents 30 percent of our oil production, the Gulf of Mexico can play an important part in securing our energy future. But we can only pursue offshore oil drilling if we have assurances that a disaster like the BP oil spill will not happen again. This Commission will, I hope, help provide those assurances so we can continue to seek a secure energy future for the United States of America.

Thanks so much.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Thanks
Thought there would be more interest in this since some people are demanding the President address the issue.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whoa_Nelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, BP is hugely responsible
but what about the reasons regs have been allowed to be so relaxed to get into this horrific crime of today? Where's the talk addressing the changes by Cheney bullshit Energy Task Force secret meetings and the the rest of the BREE that played into this?

Bring back regulations to all industries. The slope became pretty damn slippery starting with Reagan and his deregulating in the business sector, and has gone all to hell since 2001.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. BP and its operators transocean and Halliburton should all hang
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Is that right?
"In response, we are drawing on America’s best minds and using the world’s best technology to stop the leak."

Is that an item that we will ever be privvy to? Will there ever be any press coverage of these great minds? I haven't seen the first bit of news about this, except for BP's blatherings which came out alongside the other lies BP has told us.

Is the Navy involved? Wasn't Woods Hole denied an invitation to help?

I dunno, I don't trust that all that can be done is being done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. America's best minds? That is a laugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. substantiate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
24.  "America's best minds" such as climate change denier Jonathan Katz & Lockeed Martin guy Tom Hunter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Navy involved
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
9. Very succinct message.
How anyone can say the President hasn't been working on the oil blow out is beyond reason. From the first the information has been given, bad as it is. I don't need to know the middle names of those who are working on finding a solution to the disaster, they just need to be doing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
10. You made people angry
by posting what the Democratic President said. Don't worry, I didn't unrec the post - I'm not angry. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William Z. Foster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. hardly
Some may be angered, however, by the use of the president and some sort of supposed loyalty to him to attack and malign others and suppress free and open discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. This thread is not about that
what are you talking about?

Sounds like deep-seated anger/bitterness against a fellow DUer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William Z. Foster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. I agree
I am objecting to people using the president for the purpose of attacking other DUers. This thread is not about that - or shouldn't be. It sounds to me like some here have a deep-seated anger/bitterness against fellow DUers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. I was responding to the 5 recs before I clicked in, none after
That seems personal - no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William Z. Foster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. no idea
I don't know what you are talking about.

I was interested in reading what the president had to say, and did. what I found as a hateful bashing session going on directed at other DUers. My comment is that is dragging the president and the office through the mud, while calling to be promoting or defending him. That abuses and damages the president far more than criticism or dissent ever could. That suggests that people are more interested in their petty feud here, and grudges, and their own personal feelings then they are about the success of the administration. That does not bode well for the administration or the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Well, except it takes 2 and, as stated, it has nothing to do with the President
Edited on Sun May-23-10 12:04 AM by HughMoran
...any passing observer can discern the thoughtful comments from the back-and-forth grudge match here which neither helps nor hurts the President - or anybody else for that matter. Lack of substance is just that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
11. Thank you! This is what I wanted to hear from him -- what they've done,
his awareness of the incestuous relationship between oil and the government agencies, the moratorium on drilling. Just keep us up to date, and it seems as though he's doing that. Thanks again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
12. The lack of responses/recs to this thread show what the bashers are really about

They don't care if Obama "makes addresses"... even though they say they do.


They are looking for reasons to bash the President. There are three groups of people involved:

1. Trolls

2. True liberals and progressives who have it in their DNA to "hate the Man"... and when the Man is a Democrat, they'll go after him. Doesn't matter what he says or does... by virtue of holding the office of the President of the United states, he becomes "the Man". If Dennis Kucinich were named President tomorrow, within 6 months these people would be finding reasons to call him a "corporate stooge".

3. Good people who listen to talk radio and listen to other morons in the media and begin to buy into the narrative that they're selling.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William Z. Foster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. besmirching the office
This post is highly disrespectful to both the office and the man.

Using the president to spread this sort of malicious hatred does him no favors.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. I heard it, it was not completely truthful
Sorry, if I happen to be pay attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #21
40. what wasn't truthful
it would help if you clarified that as questions can be asked?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 02:43 AM
Response to Reply #40
49. "what led to this disaster was a breakdown of responsibility on the part of BP"
Not on their own. In particular, it took Bush/Cheney to enable the catastrophe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #12
39. You are right!
I'm sure all those military people 'working their socks off' won't like to hear that they are doing nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
13. I needed to hear from President Obama
Thanks for posting that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
16. yes. but damn, obama should eb sitting in every meeting for every decision to personally stop greed
and poor decisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
18. lotta bush era MMS employees seemed to have failed to do jobs too
And the whole climate of deregulation needs to shoulder some blame.

Plenty of blame to go around. Plenty of mistakes and just plain bad behavior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
25. Obama is playing politics with this one and it's already biting him in the butt.
Edited on Sat May-22-10 11:47 PM by earth mom
I bet he won't bother putting "TOP ENVIRONMENTALISTS" Al Gore or RFK Jr. on that "commission" of his. :eyes:

p.s. UNREC!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #25
26.  "I bet he doesn't put Al Gore or RFK Jr. on that 'commission'"
Why should he put Al Gore on the commission? Al Gore's support of Kerry's climate change bill has already earned him the sellout label.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Obama's has done NOTHING for the environment with his fence sitting on the biggest environmental
disaster EVER!!!!!!

Plus Obama is still allowing offshore drilling to continue along with the MASSIVE LIE of "clean coal".


SO, Puhleeze spare us all your propaganda.


Our planet is in EXTREME jeopardy and I will not sit back while you cover and protect people who have proven that they don't give a fuck about this planet! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Oh bullshit. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. Look in the mirror dude and get honest with yourself. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #32
34. You're consumed with bitterness
and I'm laughing my ass off.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. There you go with the same M.O.-attack the messenger because you can't argue with the message.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. Repeat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #28
37. Lets hope we don't have a 'Chenobyl'
I guess the feeling is that the country needs to drill its own oil for consumption and to sell and not rely on foreign oil. Quite frankly we should be not dependent on oil at all. How many years it will take to wean America off oil I do not know. I wish they could move faster in utilizing non disaster-prone energy sources. I think there a great danger in proliferating nuclear power stations.

However, I do think the government is doing a lot with what resources it has.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
27. Partial bullshit, Mr President the cause was deep sea off shore drilling
then the appalling lack of oversight or even general understanding of what they are doing, regulatory capture by the entire industry is certainly a problem, and only then we get to BP being greedy and stupid.

BP never gets to be greedy and stupid if there were checks along the path from allowing the very idea of the activity to cataclysm.

Of course he is still pushing drilling while he knows full well we cannot deal with a problem which means he has zero credibility in this area and setting up a bogus panel of industry insiders to write their own ticket again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. "Mr President the cause was deep sea off shore drilling"
I think the President is right, and your statement doesn't make sense.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #31
38. I can break it down for you then. If there was no drilling there would be no incident
or do you have another theory on how the crude got from three miles or so underground?

ARE YOU ASSERTING THE OIL FOUND IT'S OWN WAY INTO THE GULF?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #38
42. I agree with the fact that there shouldn't be off-shore drilling however....
you have to agree that there are already many oil rigs and to shut them down might take some time.

You can imagine the reprecussions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #42
45. I can but no longer see them as serious reasons to continue such an insane risk
but all I was saying above is that the drilling is the key reason for the problem. Even the most careful company will eventually have an incident and seeing the risk outweighs the most optimistic estimate of plausible benefit, it just has to stop.

We use 25% of the oil and have 2% of the world's reserves, and oil is sold on a global market which indicates we can't even drill enough to meaningfully impact price and certainly cannot do much about energy independence so the only reason to conduct the activity at this time is for private profits.

Why would we from a strategic standpoint not wish to use up other country's supply considering the numbers? Why wouldn't we want to hold as much as possible of our little three year's supply for a rainy day?

Drilling doesn't make sense for America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #45
46. The US has been bathed in oil for years
it needs to be weaned off it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-10 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
29. So where's the change, again?
President Obama concludes his remarks with:

"One of the reasons I ran for President was to put America on the path to energy independence, and I have not wavered from that commitment. To achieve that goal, we must pursue clean energy and energy efficiency, and we’ve taken significant steps to do so. And we must also pursue domestic sources of oil and gas. Because it represents 30 percent of our oil production, the Gulf of Mexico can play an important part in securing our energy future. But we can only pursue offshore oil drilling if we have assurances that a disaster like the BP oil spill will not happen again. This Commission will, I hope, help provide those assurances so we can continue to seek a secure energy future for the United States of America."

I seem to remember someone assuring us on the matter just a few weeks before disaster struck:

"It turns out, by the way, that oil rigs today generally don’t cause spills. They are technologically very advanced."

April 2, 2010

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tm8gLmuTvJ4

But of course, I am just an Obama-basher who is ignorant about the real issues and just wants a pony. I know this from reading numerous threads today about what motivates those of us who are critical regarding his administration's response to this disaster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
33. Holding BP and Halliburton accountable? ROFLMFAO!!!!!!!!
Tell you what Obama, you do that...seriously, I don't know what I'd do to see you hold Cheney's group in any way accountable. I'll come up with something good, though.

But, you won't I fear, sadly. He's bigger than you. He has far more juice and influence than you do, which is a sad fucking thing to have to admit about this country.

Please, prove me wrong. I beg of you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #33
41. Halliburton kills our own fucking troops and isn't held accountable
no reason to believe they will be now.

If Hallibuton was going to be held responsible for jack apple shit they wouldn't still be getting contracts or allowed to exist after the flood of debacles they have been a part of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #41
43. Halliburton should have been shut down long ago and its officials imprisoned
it's not too late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
44. The GOP blocks liability bill - how about that? I guess some people don't mind that?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x8396204

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20005333-503544.html

Republicans for the second time blocked legislation that would increase oil companies' liability for oil spill damages, setting off criticism from Democrats seeking to make BP pay for the disastrous oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.) on Tuesday blocked a bill Democrats have put forward to raise the liability cap from $75 million to $10 billion. He said on the Senate floor he agrees the cap should be raised, but the Senate should "wait and see where the cap should be."

"If you have it too high you are going to be singling out BP and the other four largest majors and the nationalized companies, such as China and Venezuela, and shutting out the independent producers," he said. Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) blocked the legislation last week.

President Obama released a statement saying he is disappointed by the Republicans' objections. "This maneuver threatens to leave taxpayers, rather than the oil companies, on the hook for future disasters like the BP oil spill," he said. "I urge the Senate Republicans to stop playing special interest politics and join in a bipartisan effort to protect taxpayers and demand accountability from the oil companies."

why aren't there complaints about this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #44
47. Its very bothersome but unlikely to stick. I'll be pleading with Dumbing and Old Chinless
Its a known and expected issue, not to mention one that raised some real ire. The stupids will be dealt with in time and are just trying to improve their position to water down an eventual bill, as always.

The TeaPubliKlans are transparent and clumsy. Getting our crooks and sellouts as well as scandalous BP in line is more important in the final analysis than lame puke grandstanding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Today Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 02:28 AM
Response to Original message
48. Yes, but he fails to ream the MMS for failure to actually regulate according
to the existing rules even. We'll never know if those regs had been properly overseen by MMS whether this wouldn't have happened. I have no love for BP or their cohorts, but it wasn't just their fault. When the agency that's supposed to regulate and oversee is in the pocket of those they are to regulate, that's a real issue. I sure wish Obama could see that, not only in this agency, but in so many across the government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 05:50 AM
Response to Original message
50. Never Again.
Until next time. Rinse, repeat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
51. K&R
The sound on this speech is defective, but it is an excellent speech.

It think the president should respond as Bush did at 9/11.

This "spill" changes everything with regard to the environment. The president needs to tell the American people to wake up. He is, however, handling this in his usual calm, thoughtful manner. I think he is doing a good job as to substance, but a lousy job as to the emotions of the American people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
52. "we must also pursue domestic sources of oil and gas"
He is into CYA mode.

Mr. No Drill turned Drill Baby Drill, in the midst of this clusterfuck, still wants more drilling!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
53. K & R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
54. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #54
55. Thank you. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC