Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I saw Mr. President admonishing the 3 fingerpointing assholes for not

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 10:16 AM
Original message
I saw Mr. President admonishing the 3 fingerpointing assholes for not
accepting any responsibility for killing the ocean, but I didn't hear him accept any responsibility for allowing them to drill in the first place. I love Mr. President, but now I also hate him for allowing this to happening. Gawd this is fucked up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. If I'm not mistaken, he HAS ALREADY taken responsibility for and admitted to
GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY.

Rachel reported on it and featured a watchdog NGO...

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/#37161134
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Thanks. Now before I watch, did he ask Salazar to resign?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Schema Thing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. why would he ask Salazar to resign?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. Salazar knew what MMS was and left the same people to run amok until we ended up with this.
Why was nothing done before the gulf was destroyed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. $$$$top it. Accountability is for teachers, not the glorious leaders of the Fleeced World.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. Nailed it. Salazar did nothing...
...about the meth snorting, whore bopping oilmen who infiltrated the MMS under Cheney. Those guys should have been fired, then indicted. Instead they're STILL ISSUING PERMITS even after Salazar promosed NO MORE PERMITS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. The issuer has yet to be exposed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. And did he say he was wrong for saying we needed MORE offshore drilling conducted
Edited on Sat May-15-10 10:39 AM by Karmadillo
by the lunatics who are destroying the Gulf? Did he apologize for saying oil wells did not cause spills during Katrina? Did he apologize for equating the all too accurate criticisms of the environmentalists and the disgusting lies of the corporate pigs who would drill and spill until we were all dead if it made them a buck or two? I'll bet he didn't. Talk talk talk from the Talker in Chief trying to cover for his corporate handlers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
23. He's had GREAT GOOD FORTUNE
Edited on Sat May-15-10 12:21 PM by Karenina
with appointments to replace key figures in various agencies. :eyes: Lost a bunch of CONSCIOUS, COMMON GOOD folks in the process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
38. No he actually defended him. Some underling will take a fall for not implementing changes fast
enough. Everyone admits theyb have known about needing the changes at the M+M and the dept of interior and salazar promised to make them last year but never implemented them.But somehow, it isn't his fault. Oversight no longer matters, nor does accountability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NotThisTime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #38
86. This is Obama's Heckuva job Brownie moment.... Katrina revisited...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Today Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. "Government" but not himself, and as mentioned above, no one else either.
Edited on Sat May-15-10 10:37 AM by Better Today
Apparently there may be a restructuring of MMS, but we have no idea how that will fall and Salazar and those still approving deep water wells after the explosion...

Yeah, well, you see a very different idea for accepting responsibility than I.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
80. Good. But why is the government still letting BP call any shots at all?
The only thing BP should be doing right now is liquidating their assets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #80
85. I'm not convinced it's so easy as the current Prez Guy waving a magic wand.
Need I remind you that Big Oil has Big Power and Big Money in D.C.? Need I say "partisanship" and ask if you've heard of one Murkowski?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. He allowed this to happen? And now you hate Obama. Your post is fucked up.
Totally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old guy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Kinda what I thought about the post too,
but I'm cranky today so figured it was me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. It's not just you.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. Really? So Mr. President shouldn't have known the disfunction in the MMS
Wasn't it in the news? He agreed to offshore drilling. The cows ass was still in the barn and he gave it one last shove with his endorsement. Yeah my post is fucked up. But you don't tell me "how to feel," and we'll get along just fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Today Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Exactly, perhaps he could be given a pass if he hadn't just recently
opened up for more drilling. Having done that, one is right to assume he did some investigation as to how well MMS and related government regulators were doing their jobs. But since he did open for more drilling, he should be held accountable for not knowing or not caring that regulators were oil industry stooges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. exactly correct
in fairness the MMS was a corrupt mess already. Proposing more drilling without addressing this problem either demonstrates he didn't do the research, or that he just didn't care about the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. And in that the world's welfare is clearly at stake, this lies sqarely in his lap.
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #15
22. Or that he has a herd of holdovers from the Oil Regime
and 1 year to flesh out these decades entrenched interests in addition to having his appointees for agencies to look into the mess held up in addition to wise Latinas to Beer-Birther-Tea Parties, I don't know who this guy is, but am impressed at how he's been able to nibble around the edges. I paraphrase something he said during his campaign that struck me: The Ship of State is large and unwieldy but changes in trajectory are within our reach.

His second dog whistle was, "Make Me Do It!"

See: Greece

Hollywood: OBAMA IS A CRIMINAL :eyes:

I tell you honestly, G_j, I don't know WHAT is going on! Cue Marvin Gaye:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DtUMa0FtuWY

I recognized some of these premises 50 years ago, LOVE #20...

http://www.endgamethebook.org/Excerpts/1-Premises.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. Derrick Jensen is dangerous
because he is on the mark, I went to hear him speak once, it was a pretty emotional experience for everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Today Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #22
36. He knew this and had a choice not long ago to say "no" not till a review
Edited on Sat May-15-10 01:07 PM by Better Today
of what I inherited is done to my satisfaction, instead he gave it as a gimme to Repubs who won't ever vote bi-partisanly anyway.

It was his choice to approve before apparent proper reviews. HE should be held accountable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. There's the fucking beef!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
55. they've been snorting fail dust again. it's a bad drug.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #55
70. What the fuck does that even mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
8. waiting for him to say we need to find green solutions to foreign oil
and legalize hemp and put money into funding energy sources that have nothing to do with oil

until then,pfffft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #8
21. Also waiting for that. He has some nice big feet to put down. He just has to do it!
And if he doesn't run with it now after seeing what damage is done by these oil freaks, he has no plans for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #8
45. And after he does that you'll find something else to harp
about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #45
47. If there is a legitimate harp, well then yeah, I will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #8
54. He already did.
You didn't notice the new CAFE standards and incentives for EVs and plug-in hybrids? I know, I know, nothing progressive Obama does gets much attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
14. he didn't 'allow' them. it was not an operating well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. He threw in for big oil as I recall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
25. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. Read much?
Guess you've never felt a simultaneous love for someone that whose action or inaction you hate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tranche Donating Member (913 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. I read this, "I also hate him for allowing this to happening"
Edited on Sat May-15-10 11:51 AM by tranche
I have never loved or hated anyone for something they were not responsible for. Now, maybe I can offer you some sort of obligatory, "he should have reacted faster", and maybe I could love or hate him for that, but that is not what you said in your OP. Your OP is weird and I'm sure the comments to follow will help you realize that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #30
61. Then I guess you forget this:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tranche Donating Member (913 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #61
65. Until that article travels back in time about 5 or 10 years -- there is no connection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #65
69. Yes, yes yes. BP is still in charge of stopping the death. Epic fail.
No move to advance their asses out of there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tranche Donating Member (913 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #69
84. This reply is hard to make sense of. What's the epic fail?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chillspike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
26. Mr. President knows how to play the game, do you?
Edited on Sat May-15-10 11:41 AM by chillspike
You give your enemies a little of what they want to appear bipartisan then when they fuck up you take it back. Otherwise, they will fight you forever on the basis that "You never even tried our way!" Well, we've tried it their way and look at the mess we have in the gulf. Republicans lose. Brilliant.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. Again at what expense? And whose expense? A game? NOT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chillspike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. unfortunately, big enemies like big oil require big sacrifices to subdue
now i'm not saying it's intentional but when you can't get people to listen or cooperate with you you have to let it be until they realize the error of resisting you or reality has stripped all legitimacy from their argument. very much like hoisting them with their own petard or in this case...mental deficiency.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #26
40. That is the problem with all this. Everything is now looked at as a "game" with a winning team.
Life isn't a game just as it isn't a dress rehearsal and our politcal leaders aren't fan idols.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chillspike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. I was speaking euphemistically
I know it's not a game...liberals know it's not a game ...but the conservatives treat it like one.

p.s. I don't like sports.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. Perhaps you were. I wasn't .Both sides now treat this as a game.
I don't like sports either.Perhaps that is why I can't stomach the "winning" is everything mentality that has become so prevent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zoeisright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
29. HE let it happen? Um, don't you mean Bush/Cheney LET it happen?
Jesus, get it right before you open your trap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #29
34. Ugh no. Leaving the regulating authority in place as it was, was wrong.
Further implementation of Bushitler/shootemintheface.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deaniac21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
31. And he was pointing HIS finger!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lamp_shade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
33. Yuh... right... you love Mr. President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Yuh right.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #35
39. You never really loved him to start with!!!!11
Edited on Sat May-15-10 01:58 PM by Bluebear
:cry: :cry: :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #39
48. That is just not so, and you know it so stop crying. And I still do love him!
I admonish my kid! Doesn't mean I don't love him! WTF! :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
43. They would be drilling out there no matter who was president
the fact that this happened 'on his watch' makes it his mess, I can understand that. I don't love Mr. President, but I don't blame him for this mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #43
50. Shouldn't it be the biggest most powerful capital predators (oil) that are watched the
most in protection of the American people? He let them run slipshod right over the gulf and destroy it. Yes I lay part of the blame at his feet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #50
66. I don't blame him for the mess, but am really wondering
about the response. So far I've been amazed at the lack of authority taken by the WH, they should have kicked BP to the curb by now imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #66
67. Yes! They should have been thrown overboard and forced to swim home through the oil.
Edited on Sun May-16-10 12:49 PM by lonestarnot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tranche Donating Member (913 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
44. A day later, I still can't believe this post was put on DU.
Obama allowed the oil spill to happen. :eyes:


This whole place is going to shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #44
62. No apparently you didn't have time to read the thread.
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chillspike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-10 07:19 AM
Response to Reply #44
88. No No No
He allowed drilling. He didn't allow the spill to happen. Never said that.

But that the spill happened strengthens our argument against drilling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
46. He can't end all drilling until we stop using gasoline in cars
If you drive, where exactly do you expect the oil to come from? You want other people to suffer but not Americans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #46
57. There is another problem. The push for green jobs to include
green transportation and green industry. Where is the funding? Looks like it's all going to go into oil clean-up, after everything is dead. Drilling 280 feet less than a mile is too deep to be drilling and 84 miles from our coast line is to fucking close. Why was the gulf coast allowed to be the failed experiment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #57
60. From my understanding, he allowed drilling in order to get a huge green program going
as a compromise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #60
73. And please show me the evidence. I missed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
49. Have you admonished yourself for using petroleum products?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #49
52. Oh Christ, not that tired old chestnut again.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #52
77. It has truth to it. We are all part of it.
It's wrong to claim to be above it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #77
78. Do we have to stop breathing before we can complain about air pollution as well?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #49
74. Simple answer: Yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Infinite Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
51. Obama didn't build that rig. It's been there for quite some time. Get a clue. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #51
58. No one said he built the rig.
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
53. I don't see it as his fault anyways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
56. Do you know when the rig was built and approved?
Accusing Obama of "allowing them to drill" is misleading. He's not the one who approved it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #56
59. 3/31/2010 Obama to Open Offshore Areas to Oil Drilling for First Time
WASHINGTON — The Obama administration is proposing to open vast expanses of water along the Atlantic coastline, the eastern Gulf of Mexico and the north coast of Alaska to oil and natural gas drilling, much of it for the first time, officials said Tuesday.

The proposal — a compromise that will please oil companies and domestic drilling advocates but anger some residents of affected states and many environmental organizations — would end a longstanding moratorium on oil exploration along the East Coast from the northern tip of Delaware to the central coast of Florida, covering 167 million acres of ocean.

Under the plan, the coastline from New Jersey northward would remain closed to all oil and gas activity. So would the Pacific Coast, from Mexico to the Canadian border.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/31/science/earth/31energy.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #59
63. And that has nothing to do with tihs drill
since it was already built. So your post is misleading.

Obama also called for stricter regulations, which, for all we know, may have stopped what happened in the Gulf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #63
64. Well,
"But even as Mr. Obama curries favors with pro-drilling interests, he risks a backlash from some coastal governors, senators and environmental advocates, who say that the relatively small amounts of oil to be gained in the offshore areas are not worth the environmental risks." And the timeline doesn't matter. The gulf is dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #64
68. "Actual drilling in much of the newly opened areas, if it takes place, would not begin for years."
Edited on Sun May-16-10 12:30 PM by Radical Activist
That's from your own link. You're suggesting Obama is to blame because he "allowed" them to drill. Yet he had nothing to do with allowing this drill to happen. Your OP is misleading and you should correct yourself.

If you were fair minded you could give Obama credit for closing off huge areas to drilling, having new CAFE standards to reduce oil consumption, and for having proposed regulations that might have prevented this disaster if they had been implemented sooner. The cheap shots around here are just getting old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #68
71. No, you did not read earlier in the thread. And I'm not going to reassert what I've already stated
previously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #68
72. And furthermore Salazar is still Mr. President's selection of his own choosing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #64
75. The timeline matters to someone *truly* looking for a guilty party to blame.
Edited on Sun May-16-10 12:56 PM by Orsino
As much as I despise Big Oil's control of every goddamned Administration, the facts do not support the overreaching of the OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #75
76. Ok. I've been marginalized before, this time in no different.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #76
81. You're not a victim. It's not about you being more left or marginalized.
It's about your failure to make an intellectually honest argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #81
82. This is an argument!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-10 07:03 AM
Response to Reply #76
87. I'm definitely bringing this up at the conspiracy meeting. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
79. when do you think the well was permitted?
do you really think that happened during the Obama administration?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #79
83. No.
Well permitted, drilling authorized, again a time line is not the issue. Poking a hole in the earth that has destroyed the gulf coast is. Mr. President is still apparently in favor of off shore drilling perpetuating the killing. Sorry but there is not an excuse for this position. He could have been more informed. Foreseeable consequences are not mitigating circumstances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC