The idiocy of drone attacks

[n2doc]

[Oregone]

1. Is that a drawing of the president?

[Vincardog]

2. But That is the Plan. Don't cha know?

[Mari333]

3. knr

[wtmusic]

4. More accurate: "Against the house which we think might possibly at one time

was inhabited by the guys..." etc.

[NoPasaran]

5. More like the idiocy of Ted Rall

I don't know which is more embarrassing: his infantile leftist point of view or his barely-human drawing style.

:puke:

[bvar22]

7. Thanks for the laughs!

:hi:


"There are forces within the Democratic Party who want us to sound like kinder, gentler Republicans. I want us to compete for that great mass of voters that want a party that will stand up for working Americans, family farmers, and people who haven't felt the benefits of the economic upturn."---Paul Wellstone

[frylock]

8. not nearly as embarrassing as your naivete and democratic dsing

[crikkett]

10. Keep on supporting the use of drones

Drone attacks are reprehensible because the intelligence behind them has been proven wrong so many times.

Keep supporting the use of drones, your sheriff will have his own before you know it.

[ShortnFiery]

6. Yes, drone killing of innocents who happen to associate with "suspects" creates BLOWBACK.

http://yorick.infinitejest.org:81/1/img/card-predator_yemen.jpg

[frylock]

9. gee, who knew?

i mean, if it were my fam that was blown to bits because of an errant missile strike, i'd just shrug it off.

oh yeah, lest i forget, you've always hated obama. would you rather have palin as president? what else have i left out?