Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did Dan Rather forge that letter the pope wrote against defrocking a pedophile priest?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-17-10 04:53 PM
Original message
Did Dan Rather forge that letter the pope wrote against defrocking a pedophile priest?
Just askin'.

But really, I think I can vouch for the letter's authenticity.

"Pope Put Off Punishing Abusive Priest" by Laurie Goodstein and Michael Luo. The New York Times: April 10, 2010, A1.

"The Document Trail: The Rev. Stephen Kiesle" on the NYTimes.com site. These letters look pretty authentic to me.

The Vatican didn't rush to call that letter a forgery - but rather, according to the BBC article "Pope Benedict hit by new Church child abuse allegations", defended the Pope as "exercising due caution before sacking the priest".

Anyway my point of this thread was a parody of the forged documents scandal that ended Dan Rather's career with CBS News on a rather sour note. Although Rather's message that George W. Bush was AWOL from the Texas Air National Guard was pretty honest, the evidence was flimsy. During the media uproar at that time, the media usually focused on embarrassing Dan Rather and his fellow CBS producers while ignoring the overwhelming other evidence that Bush ditched his National Guard duties.

Enjoy your weekend, everyone!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Maccagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-17-10 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm still bitter that Rather got "Roved",
Edited on Sat Apr-17-10 05:14 PM by Maccagirl
I agree that he and Mary Mapes (the producer) should have crossed their T's and dotted their I's before airing the piece-but the bottom line is that they were telling the truth and Bush was lying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-17-10 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Which topic do you want to discuss, Dan Rather or the abusive priests?
Edited on Sat Apr-17-10 05:28 PM by Bluebear
Too much to digest lol!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chollybocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-17-10 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yup.
Protecting George Bush's 'reputation' and 'legacy' is more important that protecting millions of children from being raped by an international cabal of pedophiles wearing dresses.

Pretty much. ;(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC