Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House Seeks Commander-In-Chief For Iraq War Effort

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-30-07 02:43 PM
Original message
White House Seeks Commander-In-Chief For Iraq War Effort
Edited on Mon Apr-30-07 02:44 PM by ProSense

White House Seeks Commander-In-Chief For Iraq War Effort

And Steven Hadley’s been tasked with the job of finding one. Here are the qualifications:

Mr. Hadley is interviewing candidates, including military generals, for a new high-profile job that people in Washington are calling the war czar.

“What we need is someone with a lot of stature within the government who can make things happen.”

Er.

Um.

Gosh, it’s like clubbing a baby seal, isn’t it?

’Cause, you know, with God in the White House and all, I thought there’d be somebody there with “stature” who can “make things happen” already.

But I guess not. I think I’ll go get really, really drunk now, and maybe when I wake up tomorrow all this will be over.


Monday, April 30, 2007



Didn't they get laughed at enough when they first trotted this out?

NYT

Quiet Bush Aide Seeks Iraq Czar, Creating a Stir

WASHINGTON, April 29 — Stephen J. Hadley would be the first to tell you he does not have star power. But Mr. Hadley, the bespectacled, gray-haired, exceedingly precise Washington lawyer who is President Bush’s national security adviser, is in the market for someone who does — with the hope of saving Iraq.

Mr. Hadley is interviewing candidates, including military generals, for a new high-profile job that people in Washington are calling the war czar. The official (Mr. Hadley, ever cautious, prefers “implementation and execution manager”) would brief Mr. Bush every morning on Iraq and Afghanistan, then prod cabinet secretaries into carrying out White House orders.

<...>

What an aggravatingly idiotic article. They start out with this asinine premise that we need a "War Czar" and then deteriorate into a slobberfest over "Quiet" Stephen Hadley, aka A Freakin' War Criminal Like The Rest Of Them.

Ooooh, a lady from his church comments he's "warm and funny"! Aaaah, he wears "grey flannel pajamas"!!!

Aaaah Ooooh, he helped plan and implement an illegal war and the subsequent deaths of at least 50k innocent civilians!! What a guy.

Veto Schmeeto!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-30-07 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why the hell do we need a war czar? The guy we have now isn't doing enough damage?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-30-07 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It really makes sense
Members of the party of smaller government want to create another level of bureacracy so they can obfuscate the blame. I mean conservative are fucking brilliant. Their recent success: Government does not work, put us in charge and we will prove it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-30-07 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Because they need another layer of insulation to protect caligula
from doing the one thing he is LOATHE to do (and has been LOATHE to do throughout his life). And that is - to be a man and take direct, personal responsibility for his actions and face the consequences like a rational, self-respecting adult - an adult with a cvonscience. The sad thing is, they already HAVE a commander-in-chief for the Iraq war. It's bush. The guy in the Oval Office (although not legitimately so). HE'S IT. Once upon a time, he was delighted, in fact, probably nearly creaming in his jeans, to strut around referring to himself as "The War President." Now, he shirks that duty because it means he has to bear real, honest-to-God responsibility and face real, honest-to-God consequences for his actions.

:nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-30-07 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Ah of course...
The one administration in US history that rewards people for fucking up is the same one who needs extra protection to make sure that the emperor gets to keep his job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-30-07 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. They stuck the square wheels on the car and now are driving at full speed!
Tearing up the nation in the process, but George doesn't care. George will take us ALL down with him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-30-07 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. "White House Seeks Commander-In-Chief "
Did Bush go AWOL again?

Here is somebody that might work out...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-30-07 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. I guess Sec of Defense doesn't fit the bill since Rummy left?
If we truly were at War we would have a Secretary of War.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-30-07 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. Can we take that as an admission that the CiC we have now doesn't cut the mustard?
Just wondering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youngdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-30-07 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. What the fuck is the president for, then?
That chimp should return our money and head to his pretend ranch and get after that pesky brush.

Each day, a new outrage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-30-07 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
9. Bush wants to blame it on somebody else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC