Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Help please, explain todays Tom the Dancing Bug to me. I just don't get it.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-30-07 11:01 AM
Original message
Help please, explain todays Tom the Dancing Bug to me. I just don't get it.
Is it that people carry around their concerns, their fears all the time? Usually I think TtDB is quite funny, but this one stumps me. Thank you.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-30-07 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. The way the masses cope with their fears...
is often to pick (or have given to them) a convenient scapegoat that often has nothing to do with the cause of their fears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-30-07 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. That makes sense, thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-30-07 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. What it says to me...
... is that society can't handle randomness, and we have to
compartmentalize every seemingly random act of violence as
the consequence of some identifiable group with an identifiable
motive... whether the "facts" fit the evidence or not.

The people carrying the boxes appear to be satisfied, even if they've
based their understanding on fact or fiction.

Just my take. I could be wrong.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-30-07 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. I agree
I think what it's saying is that we can't accept that what happened was simply the act of someone who had mental issues, and that there's no more meaning to it than that. We have to put it in our little box that says what it is supposed to mean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sabriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-30-07 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. Here's how I read it
He didn't know how to react to the tragedy until the M$M told him how he SHOULD react. He was incapable of processing it without help from the talking pinheads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelly Rupert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-30-07 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. There's no talking head here, or anyone telling him
how to react. Just like everyone else there--liberal and conservative--he had no idea how to react until he came across some fact (in this case, Cho's ethnicity) that allowed him to fit the whole mess into one of his preexisting opinions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sabriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-30-07 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Talking head represented by the Internet, radio, & TV info he receives. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapere aude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-30-07 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
7. He's got a whole bunch of physiological baggage and can't take responsibility for it
He finds a scapegoat and blames them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-30-07 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
9. Perhaps the concept that everyone feels a need to wrap every problem up
into a neat little package in order to feel like they're in control? It seem stha tthe others in the strip have chosen different packages to wrap the issue up in, but everything can be categorized and boxed up into one neat little package, thus requiring no further thought?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMarple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-30-07 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Perhaps we all need my "no current label " box.
Mine is pretty full right now, but that's OK. It is quite expandable. This saves a lot of wasted angst and misplaced hostility. Plus, I don't have to carry it around with me. It is quite content to hang out up in the cobwebby attic with the real mysteries of the universe.

At this juncture my daughter would tell me to quit trying to channel Terry Pratchett. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 05:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC