Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Party Gridlock in Washington Feeds Fear of a Debt Crisis

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ShockediSay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-17-10 05:37 PM
Original message
Party Gridlock in Washington Feeds Fear of a Debt Crisis
Source: NYTimes

Senator Evan Bayh’s comments this week about a dysfunctional Congress reflected a complaint being directed at Washington with increasing frequency, and there is broad agreement among critics about Exhibit A: The unwillingness of the two parties to compromise to control a national debt that is rising to dangerous heights.

After decades of warnings that budgetary profligacy, escalating health care costs and an aging population would lead to a day of fiscal reckoning, economists and the nation’s foreign creditors say that moment is approaching faster than expected, hastened by a deep recession that cost trillions of dollars in lost tax revenues and higher spending for safety-net programs.

Yet rarely has the political system seemed more polarized and less able to solve big problems that involve trust, tough choices and little short-term gain. The main urgency for both parties seems to be about pinning blame on the other, before November’s elections, for deficits now averaging $1 trillion a year, the largest since World War II relative to the size of the economy.


Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/17/business/economy/17gridlock.html



It's the Lobbyists Stupidos!

Month after month more tax deductible dollars are spent on THE ONE RECESSION PROOF JOB - Lobby Lawyer.

Why allow tax deductions for these influence peddlers, when it just screws up what used to be a democracy, and puts us deeper and deeper into debt?

WHY?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-17-10 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
pretzel4gore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-17-10 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. no $ limits before, so why $ limits now?
it defies common sense. but then again, 911 was a crime and not an attack on USA by Giant Killer Tomatoes- which is what bushinc claimed, i think it was, and were thus able to invoke the Natsecstapo (national security state poolice) to oversee the immense military response, keeping america safe.
either the nazipoohs are genius es, or we are acting like they are genius es!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sybylla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-17-10 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. Self-delete
Edited on Wed Feb-17-10 05:53 PM by sybylla
Misread the original post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-17-10 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. Fear, fear. Feed, feed.
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-17-10 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's not polarized and there is a clear majority but no will
to do what they were sent there for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-17-10 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. Maybe we should set up a "Lobbyist Commission"
Since the Representatives and Senators tend to do what the lobbyists tell them (and lobbyists actually provide the text for the bills), it would seem that better progress could be made if we could get the lobbyists to arrive at some compromises.

For example, take financial regulation. Instead of continuing with roadblocked Congressional committees, why not get all the lobbyists representing various sides of the issue together and start to see whether a multi-lobbyist compromise can be worked out. Once agreement is reached among the lobbyists, it should be a simple matter to have Congress rubber-stamp it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 27th 2024, 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC