Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mitt Says "Not worth spending $$$ to catch Bin Laden" Media response: Crickets

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 04:55 PM
Original message
Mitt Says "Not worth spending $$$ to catch Bin Laden" Media response: Crickets
Media, Right Wing Silent On Romney's Osama Gaffe
By Eric Kleefeld | bio
Yesterday we flagged an Associated Press story quoting Mitt Romney saying the following about Osama Bin Laden: "It's not worth moving heaven and earth spending billions of dollars just trying to catch one person."

We noted yesterday that such a quote coming from a Democrat would have been broadly covered by the big news organizations and probably would have triggered a major outcry.

Curiously, though, Romney's quote has been met with near-total silence.

A news search shows there hasn't been any coverage of it beyond the original AP write-up yesterday, where the comment itself was buried towards the bottom of the piece.

There's been almost no mention of it whatsoever in any of the places where one would expect such a thing to provoke outrage — that is, in the conservative media and blogosphere. There are no mentions of it on Power Line Blog, Town Hall, InsaPundit, Human Events, or notably the site of Hugh Hewitt, who has written a pro-Romney book.

Indeed, the only condemnation we can find of Romney's remark comes in a single post on the National Review's group blog, The Corner. Byron York writes: "Perhaps Romney should watch the tape of the planes hitting the towers again."

Even so, The Corner devotes far more chatter to Barack Obama's answer to a question last night about a potential terrorist attack, than to Romney's arguably much greater offense.

Why the radio-silence on Romney?

http://electioncentral.tpmcafe.com/blog/electioncentral/2007/apr/27/media_right_wing_silent_on_romney_gaffe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. k/r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. We expect idiocy from Mittens. News would be if he said something smart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why the silence?
Solely because he's a republican. :grr:

The double standard in the MSM is alive and well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phredicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Yeah - just imagine the apocalyptic shitstorm if Harry Reid said this.
But I don't believe Shit Romney is speaking just for himself - have any Publicans expressed qualms about our failure to find OBL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. Yes-and all the elected Republicans would be making it an issue. Where are the elected DEMS?
???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. OMG!
:wow: Well then, NOT ONE REPUKE HAD BETTER EVER BRING HIS NAME UP IN THE FUTURE IN ORDER TO SCARE THE PISS OUT OF US OR INFLUENCE ELECTIONS! NOT ONE! :grr: :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. Hell, Cheney QUOTED him at a meeting with fatcat donors here in Tulsa today.
OBL is Bushco's biggest fan. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. Nobody really ever talks about him
And when they do, its about all his negatives (flip flopping).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. Besides, Bush has said he's not worried about OBL, and
some Army General has said there is not a great push to find him. Mitt's just part of the same neocon club who could care less about OBL unless he's needed as a boogeyman to scare us back into submission.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. The media did not respond. What was the Democratic response then?
I understand that the Republican journalists refuse to attack him for this- but what are all the Democrats saying about it in public?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. True. But even the msm is silent.
That is telling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Of COURSE the Republicans are silent. Why are THEY supposed to attack themselves?
I thought attacking Republicans was a job for Democrats, not bought & paid for Republicans.

It is the responsibility of Democrats to make this an issue, not Republican corporations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lobster Martini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
10. If Hillary had said that, she would be burnt toast
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 05:21 PM
Original message
Yup- and every elected Republican would be talking about it. Where are the DEMS talking about this?
Edited on Fri Apr-27-07 05:22 PM by Dr Fate
???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. dupe
Edited on Fri Apr-27-07 05:22 PM by Dr Fate
???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. Like stupid should know.
The corporatemediawhores are too fucking lazy to give a shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
12. K&r#4
fuck mitt.

but fuck the the M$M for not appLying the same standards in the fear-mongering bashing of dems. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chknltl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
17. So if he were President he would have to pull out of Iraq
...because if a World Class Rogue like osama bin laden is not worth the money then who in Iraq is worth more than osama bin laden? Ok, you have my attention Mitt. May suggest going after bush? He should not be too hard to locate and we all know he has caused far more damage to this planet than osama bin laden. My plan is very cost effective...very few troops needed here, just surge a couple of aerial observation drones and a platoon of Rangers in unarmored Hummers over to that Crawford Ranch and nab him. You will guarantee yourself a position in history should you bring the rascal in. We here in the DU will be giddy with delight and you know, someone here will make sure you get a gold star!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC