Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rachel Maddow is the Liberal Version of Glenn Beck

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Pryderi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-12-10 10:23 PM
Original message
Rachel Maddow is the Liberal Version of Glenn Beck
I heard that from a right-winger at work. It's sad to think that we on the left are viewed by the right the same way we view those on the right.


How do you convince an insane person they're insane? Or am I the insane one? After all, Fox News is the most trusted news network.

help meeeeee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KonaKane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-12-10 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Don't bother. You cannot reason with mad cattle.
Seriously, bruthah, save your blood pressure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhiannon12866 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-12-10 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Rachel reports the truth about the issues.
Glenn BecKKK and his ilk tell whoppers to incite people. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-12-10 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's understandable that they think we're as whack as we think they are. That's
why they're THERE and we're HERE. :hi: :pals:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-12-10 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. Rachel shows the evidence,
Beck spews shit he makes up. He wouldn't know a fact if it hit him upside the head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleanime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-12-10 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. But...
don't we get to pick our own facts?:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-12-10 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Pick?
Beck doesn't pick, he makes them up and presents these fantasies as facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleanime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-12-10 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. True, true...
sorry should have been make up, not pick:blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StClone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-12-10 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. If attacked you have to present
Specific facts to fend off the charges. That isn't picking facts that's refuting charges. We are at a disadvantage because we are more often on defense however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-12-10 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. It makes sense.
Rachel speaks from facts and sources, the liberal way.

Glenn Beck makes up stuff and pulls the rest of it out of his ass, the Herr Goebbels or conservative way.

I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KILL THE WISE ONE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #5
24. i miss the mix me a drink segment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-12-10 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. When was the last time Rachel bawled on camera?
Oh, that's right, NEVER!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #6
30. yep!
That would be my reply. How in the world can you take a guy like Beck seriously when he behaves like he does?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-12-10 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. There is no Liberal version of Glenn BecKKK
There also is no right wing version of Rachel Maddow, nor could there ever be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hypocrisyandlies Donating Member (175 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-12-10 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. I thought I was going to have to fight you
when I saw your subject line. They think that Rachel is the liberal version of Beck because they refuse to believe that Beck just makes things up, whereas Rachel uses actual facts. The fact that they believe there is a comparison to be made between the two just scares me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-12-10 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. oh yeah, she's JUST like beck... only with facts.. and sanity....
Edited on Fri Feb-12-10 10:31 PM by dionysus
... and usually being right about stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-12-10 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
10. Lol I have wondered about this forever......
not Rachel Maddow compared to Glenn Beck but how the right wing views us the same way we view them but in an opposite way. It's like in Star Wars episode 3 when Obi Wan is fighting Anakin/Darth Vader and there's a break in the fighting and Obi Wan says "Anakin, Chancellor Palpatine is evil!" to which Anakin responds "From my point of view the Jedi are evil!".

How do you get them to see they are in the wrong, that they are insane when they believe that of you except in the opposite light? It's difficult to describe but I know what you mean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-12-10 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
11. Facts don't agree with Republicans!
Rachal actually does research, Beck is insane.

This is just their way to try and deligitimize the impact Rachel is having.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBHagman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-12-10 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
12. She's a Rhodes scholar.
Beck is an ex-DJ. Now I have nothing against DJs, but given what I know of Beck's MO and his bio, there's nothing there that's worth what they're paying him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-12-10 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
13. She does not incite violence and stupidity as does Beck
And when have you seen Rachel cry on the air?

There is no one equivalent to Beck and his Beckerhead teabaggers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-12-10 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
14. Talk radio is talk radio.
Sensational and focused on promoting specific viewpoints.

Not that I know what I'm talking about. :shrug:

I heard Rush 2 or 3 times in the early 90s. I heard Beck this summer because a colleague had him on frequently near my work area. I've never listened to Maddow. Because I don't listen to talk shows. When I want someone's opinion, I ask.

Or check in at DU, lol. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xfundy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-12-10 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
15. No.
She is not. She doesn't make stuff up. She doesn't' scream or fake a cry.

No, she is not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-12-10 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
16. When I heard the rw wackos in my life start trashing Rachel, I knew she made it big.
They are trashing her because they know she is speaks the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-12-10 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
20. She has a doctorate in political science. He has a bachelors in histrionics. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-12-10 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
22. Glenn Beck spins these wild theories and connects his theories in
absurd combinations. Glenn Beck is discourteous to guests with whom he disagrees.

Rachel Maddow presents facts and asks questions. Rachel Maddow is courteous with her guests although she lets vieweres know when she thinks her guests are being less than truthful.

There's a huge difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
the other one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-12-10 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
23. Rec'd because the title made my head explode!
Bong hits for Buddha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
25. Catch 22 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
change_notfinetuning Donating Member (750 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
26. And Sarah Palin is just as qualified as Barack Obama to be president. That's
what I heard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
27. No. To compare them is an insult to Rachel. Seriously. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
28. I strongly doubt Rachel is a recovering alcoholic.




And I'm pretty sure she's not on the verge of a total emotional collapse.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
29. She's Glenn Beck with 90% less lying
Other than that, yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
31. Pearls before swine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC