Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Report says 8 Americans died defending worthless Afghan outpost

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 08:35 PM
Original message
Report says 8 Americans died defending worthless Afghan outpost
Report says 8 Americans died defending worthless Afghan outpost

A U.S. military investigation into a battle last October in eastern Afghanistan that cost eight American soldiers their lives has concluded that the small outpost was worthless, the troops there didn't understand their mission, and intelligence and air support were tied up elsewhere in the province.

According to an unclassified executive summary of the report that was released to McClatchy Newspapers and other news organizations Friday, "There were inadequate measures taken by the chain of command, resulting in an attractive target for enemy fighters."

A statement accompanying the summary said that the report, called an AR 15-6, suggests sanctions on higher-ranking officers and "also recommended administrative actions for some members of the chain of command to improve command oversight."

The investigation found that the soldiers of Bravo Troop, 3rd Squadron of the 61st Cavalry Regiment from Fort Carson, Colo., "repelled an enemy force of 300 anti-Afghan forces (AAF) fighters, preserving their combat outpost and killing approximately 150 of the enemy fighters. U.S. forces sustained eight killed in action and 22 wounded, all but three of whom returned to duty after the attack. The soldiers distinguished themselves with conspicuous gallantry, courage and bravery under the heavy enemy fire that surrounded them."

http://www.kansascity.com/444/story/1729758.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. And conervatives want to "surge" immediately, yeah, that's a brilliant plan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Seems like the current President has bought into that
strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. They probably died defending each other and their buddies - as worthwhile as it gets!
Edited on Fri Feb-05-10 08:52 PM by stray cat
I hope most of us would fight for our own lives and the lives of our friends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. wow!
thanks for the positive spin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. i thought that they died protecting our freedom...?
that's how it always seems to be described, just about anytime a soldier dies in 'combat'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shell Beau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I can only guess that saying such helps the families of the lost ones.
No one wants to die in vain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. that's always seemed like a silly reason to me...
so- because they don't want to have anyone 'die in vain'- more and more people have to 'die in vain' to cover up the fact that the ones before them had died in vain.

when does it stop...? especially if 'victory' is NOT a realistic option...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shell Beau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I totally agree.
But really, who wants to say their loved one died for something stupid?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. No American has died protecting our freedom since 1945
And I say that with the utmost respect for any man or woman who has ever worn the uniform intending to serve their country. And the utmost contempt for those who have forced them to do otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. i feel pretty much the same way...
although, it's getting harder and harder for me to...appreciate?...those who choose to go into military service any more- considering the criminal way in which our forces are used so much any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. Expendable cannon-fodder in a lost war fought for PR. K&R
Edited on Fri Feb-05-10 09:24 PM by Tierra_y_Libertad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bigmack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
12. In Vietnam, we called those worthless firefights...
The Battle of the Next Trail-bend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC