Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

More from Turley on O'Keefe

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 12:35 PM
Original message
More from Turley on O'Keefe
O’Keefe’s continued public statements show a lack of control and caution in this criminal defense case. Most attorneys bar clients from making such comments. While there has been no confirmation of the reported gag order in the case, O’Keefe was reportedly told to “avoid all contact, directly or indirectly, with any persons who are or who may become a victim or potential witness in the subject investigation or prosecution on including but not limited to: unless for business purposes only.” That would not normally bar public comments, but his public statements could trigger a formal gag order in the case. Putting aside of rules restricting public statements in local rules (and any possible gag order), it is always a high-risk practice. O’Keefe is now locked into this defense because of his public statements. They can be admitted at trial. Moreover, if he decides not to take the stand, his public comments are likely to magnify the suspicions of the jury. In a case that is likely to turn on the jury’s view of motivation and intent, such presumptions can be highly damaging.

.....

O’Keefe now says “n reflection, I could have used a different approach.” Hmm, “I could have used a different approach” rather than dress men up as telephone repair men and try to secretly record events in a senatorial office. O’Keefe has always showed a surprising lack of concern over the legality of his actions as in the ACORN controversy. Maryland is a two-party consent state and O’Keefe showed no concern over whether he was engaging in unlawful surveillance.

http://jonathanturley.org/2010/01/30/okeefe-goes-public-with-defense-on-landrieu-controversy/#comment-108286
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Meanwhile the press is playing it all down as, 'hijinx,' and a 'prank.'
...and treating he and his cohorts as if they were just kids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Naturally.
They will get off with a slap on the wrist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Every time I hear that - I'm reminded that several of the 9/11 terrorists
were 19 & 20 years old. I don't think anyone thought that was a youthful indescretion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. Children of privilege usually never pay for their mis-deeds. It's in
their DNA. I think this man (he is 25 not a kid) is in for a rude awakening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. I can't believe his FATHER is an AG there! I would think he
would have grabbed that guy and gagged him himself!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. O'Keefe's father isn't a US Attorney
one of the guys he was arrested with can claim that honor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Oh that's right. I did hear that. Sorry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. He has powerful people - and Fox News - behind him. But will they toss him overboard?
Going to be interesting to see if they bring their full weight to bear against the criminal justice system, or decide he isn't worth it and deify some other loser who does their bidding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TorchTheWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. he'll be thrown under the bus
where he deserves to be. He's grossly inept, he's embarrassed the powerful in his party, he has no money, and he was so stupid as to commit the ultimate sin of bringing Watergate back into the forefront of peoples' minds which Repubs have been falling all over themselves trying to get people to forget for decades. Anyone who's anyone is running from this fool at warp speed. He's an insignificant little nobody who is too stupid for use, and there are plenty of insignificant little nobodies lined up to replace him who AREN'T stupid.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. In the end the idiot will make a fortune speaking at RW engagements
...and end up with a RW radio talkshow.

If a Democrat tried something like this it would be, 'treason,' and have, 'Gate,' appended to the end of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC