Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Please Mr. President" -- this is what I need to hear tonight

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 03:17 PM
Original message
"Please Mr. President" -- this is what I need to hear tonight
I remember recording Bill Clinton's State of the Union addresses on the VCR, and immediately rewinding them to watch again, taking notes. It wasn't that I was obsessive/compulsive, or a hopeless Clintonite. At the time in the early 90s, I was writing editorials for my newspaper, and I was deeply confused as to why 12 years of the Reagan-Bush reign of error was not yet corrected.

Alright, maybe I was a little bit of a fan-girl. I admit to weeping at Clinton's Bridge to the 21st Century rhetoric. But, mostly I was looking for clues as to when we'd see all the amazing progress promised in the '92 campaign. When would Clintonian Optimism be transform into something I could hold in my hand? I was sure that the answer would be contained in his epic SOTU speeches.

I'm a much older, and hopefully a little wiser now, so I know that there will be no magical answers in Obama's first SOTU address. It will have the requisite "laundry list" of promises, and he will hit many similar high notes from his campaign -- but, if he's smart (and we know he is), this speech won't be rewritten from campaign notes. Instead, this speech has to peel away last year's rhetoric, and explain what went wrong in 2009.

In short, he's got some explaining to do. We need to know what happened to the promise of progressive new leadership (with an emphasis on the leadership part). We voted for the passion of an all-electric Tesla two-seater (one seat for Obama, one for Biden) whirring down that bridge to the 21st Century, and instead we got a used minivan full of Clinton holdovers and Olympia Snowe -- pragmatic and affordable, but unlikely to get us across the finish line.

So Mr. President, tell us what went wrong. Why'd you appoint Summers and Geithner to do a job that called for Elizabeth Warren? What made you think you could walk away from health care reform? What made you think that we wouldn't notice you substituting back room deals with insurance and pharma for actually fighting for us like you promised you would? What makes you think you can freeze spending while we're in an economic depression that everyone is too depressed to actually call a depression?

Jesus Christ, I feel like I'm right back in the middle of my dysfunctional family with all the grandiose delusions and bait-and-switching. And Mr. President, you need to do the same work that my dysfunctional family needed to undertake (but never got around to) by acknowledging where you let us down, and spelling out how you're going to make it right. This is the only laundry list I'm interested in.

Back in the 90s I had trouble finding a coherent story to tell my readers about the direction of the Clinton Administration, and stupidly, I thought it was because I wasn't listening hard enough. The truth is, I wasn't finding a story, because all these speeches offer is "message" -- what we now call triangulation. It was time for action, but instead of action we got "reinventing government" and "don't ask don't tell" and NAFTA. These were shitty fucking policies designed to "take issues off the table" but not to solve real world problems.

So please, Mr. President, enough with the triangulation. Enough with the "spending freeze" to triangulate imaginary Massachusetts swing voters. Enough with the triangulating insurance companies and Joe Lieberman and Olympia Snowe with mandates and excise taxes. Enough with war spending while freezing education, infrastructure and jobs expenditures. Tell us what you're going to do. Tell it to us straight. And then do it.

I was under the impression that the president famous for The Audacity of Hope would be better at delivering said hope than the president from Hope, Arkansas. We know -- god, we know -- that hope is audacious. We're done with that. Right now we need our president to take us from Hope, to The Audacity of Action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. wows -- already with unrecs!
who knew cheerleaders could read so fast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muffin1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
4.  A rec from me
for the thread itself and making me laugh with your reply!:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. :) thanky -- and, glad someone is still laughing these days!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Right now we need our president to take us from Hope, to The Audacity of Action.
K & FKN R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. i'm fantasizing that Elizabeth Warren will be pointed out tonight, as a leader in the economic fight
my fantasies aren't what they used to be.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DirkGently Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Warren is my hero
Edited on Wed Jan-27-10 08:43 PM by DirkGently
She rocked on the Daily Show last night. Stewart told her he wanted to make out with her.

:toast:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. ack! i didn't watch last night...hope it's on the dvr!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yuugal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R
Hope seems alot more audacious now then it did a year ago. I tend to entertain hope more when the person I'm being hopeful about hasn't boned me for 12 months straight. I think something snapped in me when Obumble said "I am a new democrat" I wanted top slap his smug face every bit as much as I ever wanted to slap the shrub. My ex pointed out to me the other day what a swagger he has now. Just like the one the shrub had.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. i've found myself wondering (bill hicks-like) if he hasn't been taken into a smokey room
to view a film of the Kennedy assassination shot from The Grassy Knoll.

more likely we're looking at the result of compromises made during fundraising. it's not rocket science or mystery religion -- our leaders are paid to deliver the goods to the people who have the deepest pockets and the biggest sticks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DirkGently Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. Pardon my bare noobies
Edited on Wed Jan-27-10 05:08 PM by DirkGently
... but I lurk here from time to time, and the excellent post at the top is right on. All this talk that the President will introduce some kind of nominal federal budget "spending freeze" to, we must assume, attempt to mollify the familiar, well-intentioned-but-economically-flat-wrong populist view that somehow government spending is the root cause of our economic crisis, is disturbing.

It's disturbing not only because it suggests a continuation of the administration's misguided and ineffective) left / right "triangulation" that appears have dug the grave of healthcare reform, but also because it smacks of disingenuous pandering to the very interests who will never support this President or his goals.

I realize we need to hear the details before we judge, but "spending freezes" fall in with other non-pragmatic political Scooby Snacks like "mandatory sentencing guidelines" and "zero tolerance" policies tossed by far lesser politicians than Obama to appease the perpetually angry, perpetually uninformed mob.

It would be beneath Obama, and moreoever, simply a mistake, practically and politically, to give lip service to a notion that Obama himself must know is nonsense, rather than to stiffen his spine, admit the missteps, and make the necessary course correction to bring the economy, healthcare, and financial reform back on track, by helping to generate the political will we need to get there. How about addressing the uncomfortable but undeniable fact that we actually need to spend MORE to further stimulate the economy? How about gambling that the people will back you if you stand up for the principles that got you elected, rather than lending further weight to the bad ideas you promised to discard?

You can do it, sir. Yes, you can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. big DU welcome to you DG!
Mollify -- I love that word.

How about gambling that the people will back you if you stand up for the principles that got you elected, rather than lending further weight to the bad ideas you promised to discard?


It actually wouldn't be a gamble, b/c we know that the administration has lost boatloads of support following its distancing from original principles. To my mind, it's our only hope of rescuing the midterms. Hopefully (there's that damn word, again) there's pressure from inside the dem machine to get back on track vis a vis 2010 elections. I'm afraid, though, that the conventional wisdom is running in the opposite direction. So frustrating, b/c this is exactly what I see in my working life -- when things aren't flowing, people seek the comfort of conservative action, "yeah, it's not working so well, but we simply can't risk what we have..." etc, ad nauseum.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DirkGently Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Disappearance in the Bermuda Triangulation

This is exactly my concern. I would have thought that the hand of bipartisanship has been sufficiently bitten that the administration wouldn't run right after every perceived setback (Massachusetts) but this talk of a "spending freeze" makes me worry that the message has not yet penetrated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. the problem with the "spending freeze" talk is that it steps on all their other messages...
which is, you guessed it, triangulation -- at the expense of the all the original stuff that needs to be happening.

there's another thing that seems evident in the panicked post-MA meme-ography...multiple personality disorder. it might just be that there's too many people on the phone whispering to the press. but, that's not the case with "spending freeze." that's a giant trial balloon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. bare noobies!! teehee!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC