|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
happy_liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 01:29 PM Original message |
Supreme Court to Remove Restrictions on Corporate Donations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 01:31 PM Response to Original message |
1. Ah yes, the Corporate States of America... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happy_liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 02:03 PM Response to Reply #1 |
11. thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atticus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 05:32 PM Response to Reply #1 |
30. I wonder right along with you. When I've tried to encourage large-scale demonstrations and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orrex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 01:32 PM Response to Original message |
2. Money equals speech |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earthside (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 01:33 PM Response to Original message |
3. The end of the Republic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slampoet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-10-10 12:53 AM Response to Reply #3 |
41. oops wrong reply |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 01:35 PM Response to Original message |
4. Well now we know why dems sold us out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
monmouth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 01:36 PM Response to Original message |
5. Goodbye America, we knew ye well.....n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
6. Remember that Nader thought these Supreme Court justices were irrelevant to think about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 02:37 PM Response to Reply #6 |
15. Nader has nothing to do with this. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 05:29 PM Response to Reply #15 |
28. Supreme Court nominees amount to "not a dime's worth of difference" between Bush* and Gore. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harkadog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 05:04 PM Response to Reply #6 |
26. Where is your link to that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 05:30 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. OK then, back to the beginning. Why would you vote for Nader over Gore in 2000? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harkadog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 06:28 PM Response to Reply #29 |
33. I was just wondering if you made up the quote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 05:39 PM Response to Reply #6 |
31. And your idols would appoint justices who agree with the current crop. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 07:51 PM Response to Reply #31 |
36. No they wouldn't. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 08:24 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. You don't think an Obama nominee would be for allowing corporations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 08:36 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. Do you think Clinton's appointees would? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 01:38 PM Response to Original message |
7. Deleted message |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 01:46 PM Response to Original message |
8. This really will be the beginning of the end........ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 01:51 PM Response to Original message |
9. Democracy is dead. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 01:56 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. +100 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tinrobot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 02:14 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. Long live Corporatacracy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donheld (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-10-10 12:35 AM Response to Reply #12 |
40. +1000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal_at_heart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 04:51 PM Response to Reply #9 |
24. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happy_liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 02:20 PM Response to Original message |
13. an aside but did anyone notice this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
netania99 (172 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 03:40 PM Response to Reply #13 |
19. I think the protocol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 04:45 PM Response to Reply #13 |
22. That's the Times' "house style"; they *ALWAYS* write that way. (NT) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
90-percent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 02:35 PM Response to Original message |
14. Well, that's good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happy_liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 02:45 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. yes, exactly! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 02:51 PM Response to Original message |
17. GOOD. Let Them Spend Stockholder Money On Donations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NuttyFluffers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 03:07 PM Response to Original message |
18. but thank goodness we have all this dry powder here... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frosty1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 03:57 PM Response to Original message |
20. Isn't that just a little misleading? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
highplainsdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 04:06 PM Response to Original message |
21. Wow, we'll have the best faux democracy corporations can buy! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 04:49 PM Response to Original message |
23. Well, if corporations attain full "personhood", maybe we can start giving them the death penalty... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal_at_heart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 04:51 PM Response to Original message |
25. We already get bombarded by negative ads. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 05:04 PM Response to Original message |
27. Well, no need to vote. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
starroute (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 06:20 PM Response to Original message |
32. The final triumph of the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 06:41 PM Response to Original message |
34. the last nail in the coffin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Land Shark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 07:36 PM Response to Original message |
35. If it happens, it is a REVOLUTION AGAINST DEMOCRACY. Let's not let this acclimate acceptance of that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 10:32 PM Response to Original message |
39. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneBlueSky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-10-10 04:54 AM Response to Original message |
42. so . . . not only do the corporations own the legislative and executive branches of government . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kablooie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-10-10 12:40 PM Response to Original message |
43. So? Not any different than it is now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:41 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC