Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tiger Woods's $13.6b 'infidelity bill' (celebrity sponsorship risky for shareholders)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 08:16 PM
Original message
Tiger Woods's $13.6b 'infidelity bill' (celebrity sponsorship risky for shareholders)
Edited on Mon Dec-28-09 08:17 PM by depakid
Two US professors have pinned the loss to shareholders from Tiger Woods's marital infidelity at up to $US12 billion. The University of California, Davis, researchers said the new study speaks to the question of whether celebrity sponsorship has an impact on a firm's bottom line.

"Our analysis makes clear that while having a celebrity of Tiger Woods's stature as an endorser has undeniable upside, the downside risk is substantial, too," said Victor Stango, professor of economics. Stango and fellow economics professor Christopher Knittel studied the stock market for 13 days after Woods crashed his car outside his Florida home on November 27. Since then, several women have said they had romantic affairs with Woods. Woods eventually confessed to infidelity and lost major sponsorships.

The UCD economists compared returns for Woods's sponsors to those of the total stock market and of each sponsor's closest competitor, a UC Davis news release states. The study focused on nine sponsors: Accenture, American Express, AT&T, Tiger Woods PGA Tour Golf (Electronic Arts), Gillette, Nike, Gatorade, TLC Laser Eye Centres and Golf Digest.

Shareholder value fell 2.3 per cent - or about $US12 billion. The pattern of losses is unlikely to stem from ordinary variation of stock prices, the researchers stated in their study. Investors in three sports-related companies - Tiger Woods PGA Tour Golf, Gatorade and Nike - fared the worst, experiencing a 4.3 per cent loss, or about $US6 billion.

More: http://www.smh.com.au/sport/golf/tiger-woodss-136b-infidelity-bill-20091229-lhj6.html

It'll be interesting to see how this plays out over time. I'm inclined to buy Mark Morford's take on the matter- nothing Americans like more than to watch their celebrity demigods crash and burn, go though a period of repentance and rise from the ashes redeemed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Submariner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Although I do not watch golf, I will probably be suckered into watching
Tiger's 1st comeback tournament, just to watch the cat calls from the crowd when he makes his swing, and the reactions of the crowds. Something tells me the quiet decorum of golf will be launched into Happy Gilmore territory when Tiger returns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Missing his 10 month old son's first Christmas:
priceless
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I always find these deals interesting
probably because celebrity endorsements have never influenced me one way or another- so it's curious to consider how companies manage to get a return on their substantial investments.

It's one thing for example if a successful individual in one field or another uses certain "gear," etc. that we can see contributing to their success- but I mean, Accenture?

How easily some can be manipulated by shallow associations- and how those can also come back to bite companies in the ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC