Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should fines be tied to income?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:16 PM
Original message
Poll question: Should fines be tied to income?
IE if you get fined for driving without a seat belt, etc, should your fine be a percent of your income so that the rich and poor both feel the 'pain' equally?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Maine-ah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. what if the offender does not have an income?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Then they are in debt (basing fines on poverty level) and, uh, what happens to them now? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. I believe that there are certain exemptions.
I could be wrong though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. most fines also offer jail time as an alternative.
they'd become a guest of the state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glen123098 Donating Member (419 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Would you be OK with people going to jail because of a seatbelt ticket?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. i'm not okay with seatbelt tickets in general.
but- if the penalty for breaking a law is either a fine or jail time- they need to do one or the other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ipaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. If it's the same percentage for rich or poor
then the rich do not feel the same degree of pain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. Most fines are for revenue purposes
They're just a way to extract more money from people going about their business.

If someone wants to ride around without a seatbelt, that's their risk, and their business. Cops should have better things to deal with - and if they don't there should be fewer cops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yeah well, you won't find folks here usually agreeing with that
Edited on Mon Dec-21-09 06:25 PM by The Straight Story
I feel the same about people who want to smoke in a bar with other like minded folks, their body, their choice, butt out - the same with wanting to work there (and I know a few bar maids who smoke and work at bars).

But now we have a lot of people who want to 'protect' us from ourselves, kind of the like the church wants to protect us and keep us from sinning.

Your body, your choice is only good on ONE topic, outside of that many seem to abandon it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taterguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Do you have a source for that or are you just making it up?
I only know of one instance where fines were for revenue:

When Virginia experimented with very high fines for traffic offenses.

For most traffic fines, it costs the state more to collect it; once you pay the officer, attorneys, judges and other support people involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Most of them won't admit it, of course
The bill in Virginia which did admit it was refreshing in its honesty, but otherwise no different than what goes on everywhere else.

I point to the fact that the elected officials who push this stuff into law are frequently caught transgressing those very same laws, as evidence that they don't really believe that these laws improve safety.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taterguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. So in other words, you're just making it up
In Virginia, the fine exceeded the cost of collecting it.

In most other situations, the reverse is true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. No, I'm using common sense
Anyone who has ever heard of a speed trap knows it's not revenue negative.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taterguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Fine, cite a budget that demonstrates that
If it's "common sense" it shouldn't be too difficult
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Enjoy
http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2009-07-21-parkingfines_N.htm

You're fighting a losing battle trying to argue that revenue isn't the motive force behind fines, anyone can google "fines +revenue" and get more evidence of the phenomenon than they'll have time to digest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taterguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. That's a newspaper article, not a budget
Try again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chemisse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. I agree with your seat belt opinion.
I believe in erring on the side of freedom.

With the seat belts, you are only hurting your stupid self if you don't wear it. So why should "Big Daddy" tell you you are naughty and slap your hand with a fine?

You should just have the good sense to do it yourself, and if you don't, I guess evolution is taking its course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
9. Other: There should be no fines
because there should be no mandates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Libertas1776 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Ditto!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phasma ex machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. +1 Best solution. (Voted yes.) K&R. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
15. It's already done in the more-civilized nations in Europe.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Day-fine

Under this system, a Nokia VP was recently fined something
like 87,000 Euros for racing his motorcycle through Helsinki.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
16. There should be no fines
for not wearing a seat belt. It's a personal choice to wear one or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
21. Richest people don't have incomes. They have capital gains. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC