Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Kucinich willing to go without health insurance?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:29 AM
Original message
Is Kucinich willing to go without health insurance?
He effectively said tonight that no insurance reform would be better than that proposed by the House bill.

Is he willing to put himself in the position that his vote would put others?

Is he willing to walk in the shoes of the millions of Americans currently shut out from health insurance and health care?

It's a question I would ask of all those who voted against this bill, Democrats and Republicans alike.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good point. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
40. Thank you. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProleNoMore Donating Member (316 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. No - He Said He Would Not Be A Sell Out To DLCers, Blue Dog Dems, And Republicans
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. He voted with the sellout Blue Dog Dems and Republicans. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProleNoMore Donating Member (316 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:36 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Yes - They Would Not Vote For The Bill Anyway - False Equivalence
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. He said that no reform would be better than the reform on the table.
Is he willing to live with the consequences that "no reform" would mean to uninsured Americans?

It's a simple question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProleNoMore Donating Member (316 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. The Bill Passed Is Not Much In The Way Of Reform - Go Read The Democratic Party Platform
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:47 AM
Response to Reply #10
29. There is a difference between even "not much" and "nothing".
Dennis chose "nothing".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Dennis was playing cards with Lieberman's deck tonight.
And in fact he wound up voting with the DLCers, the blue dogs, and the Pukes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProleNoMore Donating Member (316 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:38 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Go Read The Democratic Party Platform - He Voted with The Party
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:38 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. No, he grandstanded against the party's standard-bearer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProleNoMore Donating Member (316 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:40 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Per You - For Others He Stood Up For The Principles Of The Democratic Party
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:42 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. If you have an alternate Democratic Party, who am I to interfere, but the
Democrats of which I speak are actual people. Obama. Biden. Conyers. Etc.

They're real.

Swear to god.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProleNoMore Donating Member (316 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:44 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. Well - All One Has To Do Is Read The Party Platform - If Your Real democrats Have Not
Then maybe there not democrats after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:45 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. You can go indie at any time. I can't stop you. But DK voted
against his party in a spasm of ego tonight.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProleNoMore Donating Member (316 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:48 AM
Response to Reply #25
30. Already Indie Because The So-Called democrats Have Forsaken Their Progressive Roots
That's why I ardently support Dennis, he is the last true progressive democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:49 AM
Response to Reply #30
33. One notes the self-aggrandizement in your position.
You are pure because you support the pure Kucinich?

Yuck. That model isn't working for me.

Barbara Lee support the bill. Are you saying she's not a Democrat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProleNoMore Donating Member (316 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. Sorry That everyone Cannot Be Satisfied - Have Always Supported Kucinich And Democratic Principles
Selling out ones convictions is a slippery slope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:53 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. Kucinich should re-examine his own, then.
There must be some reason why Democratic primary voters -- many of hem quite real, I assure you -- have resoundingly rejected his two disatrous campaigns for the nomination.

If the party wasn't worth much why would Kucinich seek its nomination twice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProleNoMore Donating Member (316 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:55 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. The Party Platform Is Clear - Kucinich Voted The Party Platform
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:56 AM
Response to Reply #36
38. Sorry. The bill was laid out clear and plain. He voted against it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProleNoMore Donating Member (316 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:58 AM
Response to Reply #38
39. Sorry - The Bill Is Not In Agreement With The Parties Stated Platform
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #39
41. Your Church Lady thing has nothing to do with the bill at hand or
with Kucinich's puerile defiance of it.

Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:11 AM
Response to Reply #39
44. Shall we make that an "IOU" to be handed out to those without insurance...
...when they are denied care?

"We're sorry, but the HCR of 2009 was not in agreement with the party's stated platform. We will try again in the near future. In the meantime, we hope that you somehow manage to survive and, if you do, consider voting for the Democratic Party."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #24
64. Go read the republican platform.
They exist also, you know.

You think Democrats operate in a vacuum?

Stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #13
62. unfortunately, on this issue, the party's "standard bearer"
is the biggest "grandstander" of all, unless you want to count folks like Nancy Pelosi and Max Baucus who mouth unctuous insincerities while crafting this insulting, half-assed piece of crap corporate giveaway. The foundation of the house is broken and they're busy painting the walls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Go2Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
26. Amazing - Folks should be mad as hell that we are not being listened to by our majority. But instead
we get this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. I doubt it.
I know he has his principles but realism makes you wake up to the real world after awhile. This bill would do good things for some of us here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EndersDame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. I suppose this bill is like DADT
a compromise to let gays serve in the military but not with any dignity. DADT is very stinky in my opinion and would not have voted for it and waited to work for something better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
60. Are you seriously conflating healthcare with DADT?
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:35 AM
Response to Original message
6. This bill was awful
7 months of endless debate, a re-energized GOP base for this?

Little cost containment, mandates with a provision to send people to prison, and a public option weaker than a wine cooler.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProleNoMore Donating Member (316 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:39 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. The DLCers, Blue Dogs, Insurance Companies Are Ecstatic
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:08 AM
Response to Reply #14
43. I think you missed the memo.
A bunch of Blue Dogs voted AGAINST the bill. Same with the GOP (at the bidding of the insurance companies).

It seems they are not ecstatic about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Desertrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:39 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. So because I can't afford insurance, I'll be fined & sent to jail.
Well that's just swell. If I could afford insurance, I'd already have it. Doubt this bill is gonna help me much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:12 AM
Response to Reply #15
45. You seem to be missing the bit about subsidies. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:40 AM
Response to Reply #6
16. It was what it was.
But Kucinich said that "nothing" would be better than this bill.

Is he willing to experience that "nothing" himself?

Do you see how I would find Kucinich's vote for the status quo to be hypocritical when he is currently shielded from the horrors of it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:42 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. Well I guess he could forgo his insurance and go to prison now
This is shit. Total shit. I already can see the ads in 2010...and like I've said in the past if 2010 is a bad night, the long knives will be out for the liberals who had nothing to do with setting this horrific agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:46 AM
Response to Reply #21
27. I am honestly less worried about 2010 than I am about my own mother...
...and father who are both without insurance due to pre-existing conditions.

I suspect I am not the only American with similar concerns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:49 AM
Response to Reply #27
32. I have one too
However, I'm under no illusions that this bill has somehow made my life any better. I'm out of work, no prospects on the horizon, and I won't qualify for any assistance for 2 years because of what I used to make.

I'm paying $550 a month for a shitty Cobra plan right now and will pay more after that expires with this shitty bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:38 AM
Response to Original message
12. Dennis supports single payer, which would cover everyone
so maybe you should be asking, should Pelosi go without health insurance since her bill would leave millions un-covered, unlike Dennis's bill?

But that kind of argument goes nowhere imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:42 AM
Response to Reply #12
19. Unfortunately, Dennis did not get to vote for "nothing" or "single payer".
He got to vote between "nothing" and an imperfect "something".

Dennis chose "nothing".

Is he willing to personally experience the implications of that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Desertrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:41 AM
Response to Original message
18. I seem to recall Dennis saying that everyone should have the same
insurance Congress has.

Single payer for all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:43 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. So, if not single payer, then the status quo?
A status quo that he himself is protected from?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:43 AM
Response to Original message
22. I'll take a Grijalva over Kucinich any day of the week
Kucinich's principles are good, but Grijalva has acted to improve the bill as much as he can but is unwilling to have nothing come out of this process.

Kucinich may be arguing Medicare for all 20 years from now, but I sure as hell don't want to wait that long to get something in between done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fading Captain Donating Member (895 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
28. Forced by law to pay insurance companies money?
Yeah. I'd stick with the status quo.

This is the kind of legislation that makes the fucking lunatics on the right look like they know what they are talking about.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:49 AM
Response to Reply #28
31. Congratulations on your good health.
You are truly blessed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:56 AM
Response to Original message
37. I can't speak for him but...
Knowing his past and his convictions, he probably would. You should write to him and ask him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:25 AM
Response to Reply #37
46. I will.
Thanks for the suggestion.

I think that if he's going to ask Americans to go without insurance until we get single-payer, then he too should go without insurance until we get single-payer.

It seems only fair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yellow Horse Donating Member (462 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #37
57. Can't DK figure this out by himself? That a lot of people can't afford to wait for "perfect"?
Edited on Sun Nov-08-09 12:03 PM by Yellow Horse


People are hurting. People are dying. A lot of people can't afford to wait for "someday" when we get single payer. We need healthcare NOW.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #57
59. That mindset only applies to the military
I believe it was a Soviet admiral who once said "Better is the enemy of good enough." That's not the attitude we should have taken towards health insurance reform, because I'm still convinced millions of Americans are going to be hurt by this bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yellow Horse Donating Member (462 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:07 AM
Response to Original message
42. He did the same thing with Voter Verified Paper Ballots...
Edited on Sun Nov-08-09 03:14 AM by Yellow Horse
...dropped his support from HR 811 in the last Congress. Won't support the new Holt bill in this one.

In the last Congress, the HR 811 bill didn't completely ban direct recording electronic voting machines, so it was not "perfect" enough for Dennis and some of the far left loonies to support.

So in this Congress the sponsor Rush Holt re-introduces with a full DRE ban (exactly what these people wanted last time) and now these wackjobs are saying it's still not good enough. Now they want to get rid of all voting machines outright, right now, and get hand-counted paper ballots or somesuch that a lot of people (including me and a bunch a lot more powerful than me) don't agree with and is never going to happen.

We will wait forever if we wait for the 'perfect' bill. And in the meantime, as we face the 2010 mid-terms, MILLIONS of votes are still on paperless electronic voting machines made by Diebold and its cousins.

Smart people, acting REALLY stupid, make me sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:44 AM
Response to Original message
47. If he really said that,
He's saying the same thing as Joe Lie-berman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wroberts189 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 04:14 AM
Response to Original message
48. He is willing to take a principled stand.... one I respect...


although I am glad it passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 04:48 AM
Response to Original message
49. Kucinish stood up against big insurance & mandates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThePantaloon.com Donating Member (278 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 04:52 AM
Response to Reply #49
52. He didn't stand up to shit
He voted against any reform. He voted for the status quo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 05:20 AM
Response to Reply #52
56. Standing up to shit makes a mess, just like this bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostInAnomie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 04:50 AM
Response to Original message
50. Psh... Everyone knows that DK doesn't need health care.
All he needs is "principle" and a chance to wag his finger and he can live forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 04:51 AM
Response to Original message
51. Exactly. That's what I asked on another thread. Kucinich can afford to wait
Edited on Sun Nov-08-09 04:52 AM by CakeGrrl
for his dream bill.

Would he stand on principle and refuse his (and his spouse's) insurance until the uninsured for which he says he's fighting are covered to his liking?

How will HIS influencing and negotiating skills work with this Blue Dog contingent?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #51
58. Yes.
Very well put.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kitty Herder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 04:57 AM
Response to Original message
53. The way I see it, Dennis voted against ignoring the healthcare issue for another decade or two.
Edited on Sun Nov-08-09 05:01 AM by Kitty Herder
This bill will accomplish little to nothing, but it will shut people up. That's the last thing we need. We need to be angry and loud in demanding real healthcare reform. If this passes, congress can say they've dealt with healthcare and ignore our pleas when we still cannot afford to pay for healthcare, with or without insurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MSchreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 05:01 AM
Response to Original message
54. I imagine he's done it before
Living in a car makes it hard for insurance companies to collect premiums. That should give people here pause. After all, he's probably the only one in the House who's ever been without medical insurance (or a home, or utilities) in his/her life (I can't think of any other, can you?). Perhaps he knows something you all don't about the implications of this bill. Just a thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 05:07 AM
Response to Original message
55. I don't have insurance and would probably get a subsidy under this bill..
And yet I think Kucinich is right, mandated private insurance is utterly vile and IMO unconstitutional.

I personally think the health insurance companies are pulling a "Br'er Rabbit" over this, "Please don't throw me in that briar patch, Br'er Fox"..



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
61. We've gone from "health care reform" to "health insurance reform."
How easily we've fallen into line as the goalposts were moved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #61
63. No, this still counts as "health care reform".
Considering millions of Americans have been denied health care in their denial of health insurance. It was always about how to provide health insurance to people, it was never about changing the way we practice health care (i.e. the patient-doctor relationship), which is what "health care reform" really denotes.

IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
65. No, and that is why he is pushing a plan that would cover ALL Americans
The plan passed by the House would not cover all Americans, it would merely prosecute people who didn't send a monthly check to the insurance industry.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #65
66. He voted against a plan that would cover 96% of Americans.
He voted for the status quo in which 45,000 Americans die every year from lack of health insurance.

Is he willing to live the reality of his vote or not? Is he too willing to go without until his plan of choice comes to a vote? Is he willing to shun the private insurance that he decries, yet is covered by?

Is he willing to live his principles or just spout off about them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #66
67. This bill covers hardly anyone, it mandates that we buy coverage
Ordering people to buy coverage from private industry is not the same as providing coverage no matter how they try to spin it. The claim that this bill covers 96% of Americans is a straight up lie, if it covers us then why do we have to buy coverage?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #67
69. Um, hate to say it but single-payer ain't free.
People have to pay for that too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #69
70. I never said it was free, but it costs a hell of a lot less than our current system
Edited on Sun Nov-08-09 03:21 PM by Bjorn Against
We pay more for health care than any other nation in the world, and this bill is not going to change that fact.

On edit: I should also point out that my post was not about single payer, it was about your false claim that this bill covers 96% of Americans. I find it interesting that you changed the topic so quickly when I pointed out that was not true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
68. Why should he?
The goal is to make sure that everyone has access to health care, not that fewer people do.

His vote isn't keeping people from having health care.

The bill itself does that. There's nothing universal in there, and people with bad insurance, like myself, will continue to go without care because they can't afford it, even with the insurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happy2bhere Donating Member (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
71. I wish someone would help me out
Are these numbers for real?

Crunched the #s, & it looks like by Jan/2010 I'll have health insurance for $80 or less/month.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x6913410

I was not real happy about the mandated insurance until I read this thread above. It seems to me that if these numbers are accurate, this will help many low income people have health care that could not otherwise....and that seems like something that Kucinich would support.

Kucinich has taxpayer funded insurance now, but this plan would have insured his poverty striken family of origin for free. How could he argue with that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC